Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 5 Issue 2 - February2018

 

 

 

A study of HbA1c and dyslipidemia in diabetes mellitus

 

L Karpagavel1*, N Ananthi2

 

1Professor and HOD, Department Of Biochemistry, Madha Medical College and Research Institute, Thandalam, Chennai-600128, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

2Professor and HOD, Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Tamil Nadu, INDIA.

Email: karpag@yahoo.com

 

Abstract               Background: HbA1c is commonly used as a marker of long term glycemic status. Elevated HbA1c has also been regarded as an independent risk factor for CAD in subjects with or without diabetes Aims and Objectives: To study HbA1C and dyslipidemia in Diabetes Mellitus. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the diabetic patients at tertiary health care center during six-month period i.e. January 2017 to July 2017 in the randomly selected 100 known diabetic patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by Oral Glucose tolerance test, in all the patients which selected for study undergone Glycosylated HbA1C, lipid profile. The statistical analysis done by Chi-square test,  calculated by SPSS 19 version software. Result: The majority of the patients were in the age group >60 i.e. 32%, 50-60 i.e. 27% followed by 40-50-26%, 30-40 i.e. 10%, 20-30 were 5%. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 69% followed by Female i.e. 31%. Only 7.32 % were dyslipedimic in Normal (6.0%) range, 19.44% in Prediabetic (6.0%-6.4%) range and in the Diabetic (>6.4) range were dyslipedimic, so the majority of the dyslipedimic persons were having HbA1C level in the Diabetic (>6.4) range. Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study dyslipedimia was significantly prevalent in the patients who were having higher HbA1C level .

Key Words: HbA1C (Glycosylated Hemoglobin), Dyslipidemia, Lipid Profile.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

HbA1c is commonly used as a marker of long term glycemic status. Elevated HbA1c has also been regarded as an independent risk factor for CAD in subjects with or without diabetes. Thus elevated HbA1c has been proposed as an independent risk factor for both diabetics and CAD patients 1. Significantly increased levels of cholesterol and lipids are seen in type 2 diabetic patients with CAD as compared to diabetic patients without CAD2. It has been observed that there is a direct correlation between HbA1c and the severity of CAD in diabetic patients3. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) estimated that the risk of diabetes related mortality increased 25% for each 1% increase in HbA1c. It has also been estimated that each percentage point increase in HbA1c corresponds to a 35% increase in the risk of macrovascular complication and an 18% increase in risk of myocardial infarction4. A strong correlation has been shown between lipid profile and CAD. The Framingham study has demonstrated a linear increase in CAD risk with increment of TC level from 180 mg upward. The study established that individuals with HDL cholesterol less than 35 mg/dl have 8 times increase in CAD incidence than those with HDL cholesterol more than 65 mg/dl5. The Lipid Research clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial concluded that a 1% fall in the TC reduced the CAD risk by 2%6. Helsinki heart study concluded that a mean 12% rise in HDL cholesterol and an 11% fall in LDL cholesterol were both correlated with a 34% decline in CAD7. Very few studies have shown a positive correlation between glycemic control and lipid profile. Dyslipidemia, frequently occurring in type 2 diabetes patients, might play a critical role in accelerated macrovascular atherosclerotic disease formation and may contribute significantly to the excess risk of CAD in type 2 diabetes patients 8. Early therapeutic interventions, aiming to stabilize blood glucose levels along with reduction in TG and LDL and to increase HDL, significantly reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes 9.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the diabetic patients at tertiary health care center during six-month period i.e. January 2017 to July 2017 in the randomly selected 100 known diabetic patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by Oral Glucose tolerance test, in all the patients selected for study undergone Glycosylated HbA1C, lipid profile. All details of the patients like age, sex etc. noted. The lipid profile of the study was analyzed as per the standard definition of dyslipidemia- Low HDL 190 mg/dl, high cholesterol >200 mg/dl, and high TG >200 mg/dl. The statistical analysis done by Chi-square test, calculated by SPSS 19 version software.

 

RESULT

Table 1: Distribution of the patients as per the age

Age

No.

Percentage (%)

20-30

5

5

30-40

10

10

40-50

26

26

50-60

27

27

>60

32

32

The majority of the patients were in the age group >60 i.e.32%, 50-60 i.e. 27% followed by 40-50-26%, 30-40 i.e. 10%,  20-30 were 5%.

 

Table 2: Distribution of the patients as per the sex

Sex

No.

Percentage (%)

Male

69

69

Female

31

31

Total

100

100

The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 69% followed by Female i.e. 31%

 

Table 3: Correlation of Dyslipidemia with HbA1C level

HbA1C

Dyslipidemia Present

Absent

Total

Normal (6.0%)

3 (7.32)

38 (92.68)

41 (100%)

Prediabetic (6.0%-6.4%)

7 (19.44)

29 (80.56)

36 (100%)

Diabetic (>6.4)

15 (65.22)

8 (34.78)

23 (100%)

Total

25 (25%)

75 (75%)

100 (100%)

(X2 = 27.27, df=2, p<0.0001)

Only 7.32 % were dyslipedimic in Normal (6.0%) range, 19.44% in Prediabetic (6.0%-6.4%) range and in the Diabetic (>6.4) range were dyslipedimic, so the majority of the dyslipedimic persons were having HbA1C level in the Diabetic (>6.4) range.

 

DISCUSSION

It is estimated that currently India has 62.4 million people with diabetes mellitus. This is a major public health challenge, and it is increasing in epidemic proportions. Chronic hyperglycemia leads to micro- and macro-vascular complications. The lipid abnormalities in diabetics such as increased cholesterol, increased LDH, high triglycerides (TG), and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) are contributing to the mortality and morbidity. Worsening of glycemic control deteriorates lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities and particularly of diabetes mellitus. The combination of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension produces enhanced atherogenic environment within the circulation. This leads to increased risk of ischemic heart disease, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Diabetes mellitus is considered as coronary heart disease equivalent. Insulin resistance, relative insulin deficiency, and obesity are associated with deranged lipid profile. The American Diabetes study has come to a conclusion that HBA1Cequivalent. Insulin resistance, relative insulin deficiency, and obesity are associated with deranged lipid profile. The American Diabetes study has come to a conclusion that HBA1C<7 mg/dl signifies optimal blood glucose levels. The management should focus on controlling diabetes and managing lipid levels which will reduce mortality and morbidity for ischemic heart disease and other diabetic complications.10,11-18 In our study we have seen that the majority of the patients were in the age group >60 i.e.32%, 50-60 i.e. 27% followed by 40-50-26%, 30-40 i.e. 10%, 20-30 were 5%. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 69% followed by Female i.e. 31%. Only 7.32 % were dyslipedimic in Normal (6.0%) range, 19.44% in Prediabetic (6.0%-6.4%) range and in the Diabetic (>6.4) range were dyslipedimic, so the majority of the dyslipedimic persons were having HbA1C level in the Diabetic (>6.4) range. These findings are similar to Prabhavathi K.19 they found HbA1c showed direct and significant correlations with cholesterol, TG and LDL. Univariate analysis showed that HbA1c was a good predictor of circulating lipid levels.

 

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded from our study dyslipedimia was significantly prevalent in the patients who were having higher HbA1C level .

 

 

 

REFERENCES

    • Khan HA. Clinical significance of HbA1c as a marker of circulating lipids in male and female type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 2007;44:193–200. 
    • Giansanti R, Rabini RA, Romagnoli F, Fumelli D, Sorichetti P, Boemi M, et al. Coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a study on a middle-aged and elderly population. Arch GenontolGeriatr. 1999;29(2):175–82. 
    • Ravipati G, Aronow WS, Ahn C, Sujata K, Saulle LN, Weiss MB. Association of hemoglobin A(1c) level with the severity of ischemic heart disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(7):968–9. 
    • America Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S15–S35. 
    • Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97(18):1837–47. 
    • The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;251(3):351–64. 
    • Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, Heinonen OP, Heinsalmi P, Helo P, et al. Helsinki heart study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(20):1237–45. 
    • Garg A, Grundy SM. Management of dyslipidemia in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(2):153–69.
    • Jones PH. Clinical significance of recent lipid trials on reducing risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(4A):133B–140B. 
    • The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Medical Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Jacksonville, FL: AACE; 2002. p. 40-82.
    • Taskinen MR. Diabetic dyslipidemia: From basic research to clinical practice. Diabetologia2003;46:733-69.
    • Jamashaid T, Qureshi A. Hyperglyceridemia in Diabetics. Pak Postgrad Med J 2002;13:159-60.
    • Grundy SM. Hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol2006;83:25-9.
    • American Diabetes Association. Implications of United Kingdom Prospective diabetes study. Diabetes Care 2003;26:28-32.
    • Selvin E, Coresh J, Shahar E, Zhang L, Steffes M, Sharrett AR. Glycaemia (haemoglobin A1c) and incident ischaemic stroke: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Lancet Neurol2005;4:821-6.
    • Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with Type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;339:229-34.
    • Windler E. What is the consequence of an abnormal lipid profile in patients with Type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome? AtherosclerSuppl2005;6:11-4.
    • Mohan V, Shah S, Saboo B. Current glycemic status and diabetes related complications among Type 2 diabetes patientspatients in India: Data from the achieve study. JAPI 2013;61:13-5.
    • Prabhavathi K.KirthanaKunikullaya U., and JaisriGoturu.Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) - A Marker of Circulating Lipids in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.J ClinDiagn Res. 2014 Feb; 8(2): 20–23.