Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 7 Issue 2 - August 2018

 

Ischemia modified albumin in early diabetic nephropathy

 

Mukherjee Brijesh1*, Sahoo Sibasish2

 

1Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Hi-tech Medical College, Rourkela, Odisha, INDIA.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, INDIA.

Email: taararia@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Ischemia and hypoxia are observed in diabetic patients in addition to chronic hyperglycemia and intensified oxidative stress. It is reflected by increased markers levels of oxidative protein damage, especially in patients with vascular complications, as well as ischemia−modified albumin (IMA). Objective: To assess the plasma levels of IMA in T2DM patients with early diabetic nephropathy and their relationship with routine markers of kidney disease severity (urinary microalbumin, plasma creatinine concentration) Materials And Methods: Plasma IMA levels were manually determined in 100 patients and 50 healthy people by spectrophotometric Co(II)−albumin binding assay. Micoalbuminuria was detected using turbidimetric method and creatinine using Jaffe’s method in Cobas Autoanalyzer Results: The IMA levels in the diabetic patients were significantly higher than in the healthy controls and increased progressively with the degree of DN. The normoalbuminuria group 1 had the lowest IMA level, which significantly increased with development of microalbuminuria and as nephropathy progressed in group 2 and group 3. There were significant relationships between IMA and microalbuminuria (r = 0.87) Conclusion: This study indicates that the observed increased IMA in T2DM is connected with diabetic nephropathy. Measuring IMA plasma levels provided additional information about nephropathy development and it may be helpful in assessing the severity of oxidative stress, which causes kidney dysfunction at an early stage.

Key Words: Diabetic nephropathy. Ischemia modified albumin.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic complications are associated with increased incidence, severity, and delayed recovery from the stress-induced ischemia participating in endothelial dysfunction, which may lead to the development of angiopathy, especially diabetic nephropathy (DN)1. The pathogenesis of DN is a complex process and it is not yet fully understood. The cause of increased urinary albumin excretion, which is considered to be an early sign of DN, can be attributed to a defect in the glomerular membrane filtration, resulting from renal endothelial damage due to hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, ischemia, and inflammation.2-5 However, several studies have reported development of DN in 29%–61% of type 2 diabetes patients having normal urine albumin levels, as microalbuminuria develops only when significant damage to the glomerular function has already occurred.6-8 This significant observation impedes the use of microalbuminuria as a good predictive marker9 and necessitates the need for a better biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity for early detection of DN.10 Free radical generation coupled with decreased antioxidant defence mechanism and associated ischemia in diabetes leads to an alteration in the tertiary structure of human serum albumin within minutes of arterial occlusion; hence, it is termed ischemia-modified albumin (IMA). As a result of increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), structural modifications of the albumin molecule can occur. IMA is now being used as a sensitive biomarker for detecting cardiac ischemia as an indicator of oxidative stress.11 Recently, some studies were published regarding the role and diagnostic significance of IMA in noncardiac disorders. For the first time, Piwowar et al reported the association of IMA in diabetes and reported 75% increased value of IMA in diabetes compared with control after estimating it by manual spectroscopic method.12 Elevated IMA levels were also detected in diabetic ketoacidosis, pulmonary embolism, peripheral vascular disease, brain ischemia, infection, liver disease, trauma, some neoplasms, and complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies.13-16

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out in the Department of Biochemistry, after approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee on 8th October, 2016, from November 2016 to April 2018 under the guidance of Prof Dr P K Mishra and in collaboration with the Department of Medicine, HMCH, Rourkela. The selected diabetic patients visiting the Medicine OPD were evaluated for serum IMA, serum creatinine and urine microalbumin. The patients were divided into three groups as follows:

Group I: comprised of 30 patients with duration of DM (diabetes mellitus) less than five years. Group II: comprised of 48 patients with DM duration between 5 to 10 years

Group III: comprised of 22 patients with history of DM more than 10 years.

The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to form the patient groups:

Inclusion Criteria

  • HbA1c > 8%
  • Serum Cholesterol > 250 mg/dl
  • Consent given by the patient for compliance with study protocol
  • Age > 30 years and <70 years.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients of thyroid dysfunction
  • Patients on glucocorticoid therapy
  • End Stage Renal Disease
  • Diabetic patient with macroalbuminuia
  • Current participation in another clinical trial

Control group: 50 age and sex matched healthy individuals were taken as control. The following methods were employed for performing the various biochemical parameters:

  • Plasma Glucose was measured by Hexokinase method in Autoanalyzer
  • Serum Creatinine was measured by Jaffe’s method (Compensated Method for Serum and Plasma in Auto- analyzer
  • Glycated Hemoglobin was measured by HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) in D10 Analyzer
  • Microalbumin in urine was assayed using Immunoturbidimetry in Auto Analyzer
  • IMA was measured by an indirect method based on the albumin cobalt binding (ACB) colorimetric assay by addition of a known amount of Co2+ (Cocl2.6H2O,1g/l,sigma) to serum specimen and further assessment of the unbound Co2+ by colorimetric assay using dithiothreitol (DTT,3g/l, sigma) for colour development.

 

RESULTS

The patients were divided in to three groups according to the duration of DM (<5 years, 5-10 years and >10 years respectively). The baseline characteristics of each group are presented as mean ± standard deviation (Table 1). Fasting glucose levels were higher in the study groups (group 3>group 2> group 1). However there was no significant increase in successive groups (p>0.05). Similarly HbA1c showed increase in successive groups without any significant increase (p>0.05). The average age of patients was highest in group 3 proving microvascular complication occur at a late age. Serum creatinine levels showed significant increase in group 3 when compared with control group (Table 2). This shows that creatinine levels increase when nephropathy progresses and cannot be an ideal marker for early nephropathy. Urine microalbumin increased significantly in group 2 and group 3 but was normal in group 1 (Figure 1). Serum IMA levels increased progressively as duration of diabetes increased (Figure 2). The levels were significantly higher in group 2 also compared with control group (Table 2).

Table 1: Comparison of baseline characteristics among the groups

Parameters

Control (n=50)

Group 1(n=30)

Group 2 (n=48)

Group 3 (n=22)

Male/Female

28/22

17/13

29/19

12/10

Age in years

48.5±9.15

46.4±4.03

51.27±4.34

60.82±3.45

HbA1c (%)

4.54±0.34

9.68±0.75

10.37±1.21

10.42±1.61

Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl)

85.92±7.84

149.37±25.34

153.55±25.49

166.22±25.64

Urine microalbumin (mg/l)

7.90±2.92

15.65±5.30

37.58±17.57

131.68±51.94

Serum creatinine (mg/dl)

0.74±0.06

0.75±0.08

0.80±0.10

1.51±0.22

IMA (ng/ml)

45.77±7.43

94.17±26.90

132.73±19.40

172.14±50.53

Average duration of diabetes in years

Nil

4.3±0.3

8.6±1.1

13.8±2.1

Table 2: Calculated p value by paired t-test after comparing each group with control.

Parameters

Control and Group 1

Control and Group 2

Control and Group 3

Serum creatinine

>0.05 (NS)

>0.05 (NS)

<0.05 (S)

Urine microalbumin

>0.05 (NS)

<0.01(S)

<0.001(HS)

IMA

<0.01 (S)

<0.001 (HS)

<0.001 (HS)

 

1 

Figure 1: Urine microalbumin levels in different groups                             

2
Figure 2:
IMA levels in different groups

Both serum creatinine and urine microalbumin showed good correlation with serum IMA. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was 0.67 and 0.87 respectively when IMA was plotted in x-axis and creatinine and urine microalbumin was plotted in y-axis (Figure 3 and 4).


 

3
Figure 3                                                                                            Figure 4

Figure 3: Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.67). Serum IMA x-axis and serum creatinine y-axis; Figure 4: Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.87). Serum IMA x-axis and urine microalbumin y-axis


 


DISCUSSIONS

Diabetic patients are 17 times more prone to develop kidney disease than the normal population. The prevalence of DN is related to the prevalence of diabetes, which varies in different ethnic groups and geographical areas. The peak onset of DN is between 5-15 years after the onset of diabetes, as suggested in the study by Adler, et al.17 Patients who do not develop proteinuria after 20-25 years have only 1% risk of nephropathy, Gall, et al.18 A clinic – based study conducted at Dr Mohan’s Diabetes Specialties Centre (DMDSC) revealed that 9% of patients had proteinuria and 20-25% had microalbuminuria at any given time. In the Chennai Urban Population Study (CUPS), it was found that the prevalence of overt proteinuria was 2.2% and microalbuminuria was 26.3%. In the CURES population [19], the prevalence of overt proteinuria and microalbuminuria were, respectively, 2.2% and 26.9%. The prevalence rate is related to the duration of diabetes and increases in presence of risk factors like high HbA1c levels, hyperlipedemia and hypertension. These risk factors have been elaborated by studies done by Timothy et al.20. Taking all the above factors in to account, the study design of this study was framed accordingly. The study included diabetic patients having two risk factors (Serum Cholesterol >250 mg% and HbA1c >8%). This increased the chances of inclusion and evaluation of DN patients in the study, as evident from the various cited studies. This study results suggest that albumin modification occurs in the early stage of the disease provoked probably by hyperglycemia-induced stress and takes part in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. IMA as an ischemic marker indicates underlying subclinical disease or vascular dysfunction in diabetic kidney, as suggested by Dash et al and Borderie et al21,22. Analyzing the relationships between IMA and parameters applied in the routine diagnosis of renal dysfunction, significant correlation was found with the urine microalbumin in all the three groups. With serum creatinine, IMA correlated only moderately and in group 3 (duration of diabetes >10 years), which proves that IMA is a helpful marker for detecting early renal dysfunction.

 

CONCLUSION

The current study supports the essential relationship between the serum levels of IMA in type 2 diabetes patients and its utility in predicting vascular damage in DN. Increase in serum IMA level was more marked in diabetes without microalbuminuria and early DN cases compared with normal individuals, reinforcing the hypothesis that estimation of serum IMA may be used as a diagnostic marker to assess early detection and progression of nephropathy in diabetes. The clinical significance of IMA lies in its high negative predictive value, which may help in excluding the presence of early DN in a population. A cutoff value ≥89 ng/ml of serum IMA, as determined in this study, may help clinicians to diagnose early DN among normoalbuminuria cases or diabetes without microalbuminuria, which may help in the prognosis of the disease as well. Hence, along with the established markers such as serum creatinine and urine microalbumin, serum IMA estimation can be used as an auxiliary marker for early detection of DN.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Piwowar A, Kordecka MK, Warwas M. Connection between ischemia-modified albumin levels and markers of diabetic nephropathy and oxidative protein damage in type 2 diabetic patients. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2009; 18(4):353–60.
  2. Moresco RN, Sangoi MB, De Carvalho JA, Tatsch E, Bochi GV. Diabetic nephropathy: traditional to proteomic markers. Clin Chim Acta. 2013; 421:17–30. [PubMed]
  3. Booya F, Bandarian F, Larijani B, Pajouhi M, Nooraei M, Lotfi J. Potential risk factors for diabetic neuropathy: a case control study. BMC Neurol. 2005; 5:24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR, UKPDS Study Group Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74. Diabetes. 2006; 55:1832–9. [PubMed]
  5. Behl T, Kaur I, Goel H, Pandey RK. Diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy as major health burdens in modern era. WJPPS. 2014; 3(7):370–87.
  6. Fiseha T. Urinary biomarkers for early diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Biomark Res. 2015; 3:16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Cohen MP, Lautenslager GT, Shearman CW. Increased collagen IV excretion in diabetes. A marker of compromised filtration function. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:914–8. [PubMed]
  8. Isakova T, Xie H, Yang W, et al. Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study Group Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risks of mortality and end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. JAMA. 2011; 305:2432–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Barratt J, Topham P. Urine proteomics: the present and future of measuring urinary protein components in disease. CMAJ. 2007;177:361–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Kim SS, Song SH, Kim IJ, et al. Clinical implication of urinary tubular markers in the early stage of nephropathy with type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012; 97:251–7. [PubMed]
  11. Ma SG, Jin Y, Hu W, Bai F, Xu W, Yu WN. Evaluation of ischemia-modified albumin and C reactive protein in type 2 diabetics with and without ketosis. Biomark Insights. 2012; 7:19–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Piwowar A, Knapik-Kordecka M, Warwas M. Ischemia-modified albumin level in type 2 diabetes mellitus – preliminary report. Dis Markers. 2008;24(6):311–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Apple FS, Wu AH, Mair J, et al. Future biomarkers for detection of ischemia and risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem. 2005; 51:810–24. [PubMed]
  14. Van Rijn BB, Franx A, Sikkema JM, Van Rijn HJ, Bruinse HW, Voorbij HA. Ischemia modified albumin in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2008; 27:159–67. [PubMed]
  15. Knapik Kordecka M, Piwowar A, Zurawska Plaksej E, Warwas M. Ischemia modified albuminspecific marker in cardiological diagnostics? Wiad Lek. 2008; 61:263–8. [PubMed]
  16. Sbarouni E, Georgiadou P, Kremastinos DT, Voudris V. Ischemia modified albumin: is this marker of ischemia ready for prime time use? Hellenic J Cardiol. 2008; 49:260–6. [PubMed]
  17. Gall MA, Hougaard P, Borch-Johnsen K, Parving HH (1997) Risk factors for development of incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus: prospective, observational study. BMJ 314: 783-788.
  18. Ranjit Unnikrishnan I, Rema M, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Shanthirani CS, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Diabetic Nephropathy in an Urban South Indian Population. The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES 45)
  19. Evans TC, Capell P (2000) Diabetic Nephropathy, Clinical Diabetes. 18
  20. Meltzer AA, Everhart JE (1995) Unintentional weight loss in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 142: 1039-1046.
  21. Dash P, Mangaraj M, Ray S. Physiobiochemical metabolism ischaemia modified albumin-an indicator of widespread endothelial damage in diabetes. J Physiobiochem Metab. 2014; 3:1.
  22. Borderie D, Allanore Y, Meune C, Devaux JY, Ekindjian OG, Kahan A. High ischemia-modified albumin concentration reflects oxidative stress but not myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. Clin Chem. 2004; 50:2190–3. [PubMed]