Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content-Volume 15 Issue 1 - July 2020


Reasons for third molar extraction - A cross sectional retrospective study

 

Maina Bekal1, Brijesh K2*

 

1Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, 2Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthiology and Critical Care, Akash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Prasannahalli, Near International Airport, Devanahalli, Bengaluru Rural, Karnataka -562110, INDIA.

Email: brijeshkumar291@yahoo.co.in  

 

Abstract               Background: Tooth extraction is the most common dental procedure till date. The various reasons for tooth extraction being dental caries and periodontal disease. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the etiology of extraction of erupted third molar tooth. Settings and design: A retrospective cross sectional study was done on patients visiting department of dentistry from January 2018 to June 2018 for third molar extraction. Materials and method: Patients between 21 to 80 years undergoing extraction of erupted maxillary or mandibular third molar tooth were included. Patients with partially erupted and impacted third molars, medically compromised patients and pregnant females were excluded. Patients were evaluated by age, gender, the type of tooth extracted (maxillary/mandibular), etiology of the extraction. Statistical analysis used: Data was expressed as percentages. Results: A total of 192 extractions were done on 182 patients and analysed. The male: female ratio was 1:1.1. Mandibular third molars were commonly extracted (61.97%). The main etiology for extraction of teeth were severe caries / pulpal necrosis (60.9%) followed by malopposed/malpositioned tooth (20.3%) and severe periodontal disease (16.14%). The less common etiological factor for extraction were preprosthetic extraction (2.1%) followed by teeth in the line of fracture (0.5%). Conclusion: The main etiology for third molar extraction was severe caries / pulpal necrosis. Mandibular third molar were more commonly extracted than the maxillary third molar teeth.

Keywords: Extractions, Dental caries, Periodontal disease, Third molar

 

INTRODUCTION

Teeth are removed from the mouth for a variety of reasons. Although the aim of dentistry is to preserve and maintain the teeth in the oral cavity, it is still necessary to remove some of them1. Third molars are the last tooth to erupt in the oral cavity. Most of the times the third molars fail to completely erupt in the oral cavity and hence remains partially erupted or impacted. Impacted third molars are the most common developmental disorder of the human being2. Surgical management of impacted third molars is a common treatment routinely performed in the clinics of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Removing asymptomatic third molars is not without controversy and debate3. Many of the studies have suggested that dental caries is the major reason for extraction of permanent teeth in younger age group but as the age increases periodontal disease becomes more important reason for tooth loss4. Various studies have been done to find the reasons for impacted third molar extraction either due to pathology or prophylactic removal. However very few studies have been done to analyse the reasons for erupted third molar removal. The present study was conducted considering erupted third molar as any other permanent tooth in the oral cavity. Hence the aim of the present study was to evaluate the distribution and etiology of the extraction of the erupted third molar tooth.

 

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A cross sectional retrospective study was done at Akash hospital, Devanahalli to evaluate the various reasons for extraction of third molar teeth.

Setting and design: A retrospective cross sectional study was done on patients visiting department of dentistry from January 2018 to June 2018 for third molar extraction.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients between the age of 21 and 80 years
  2. Patients undergoing extraction of erupted maxillary or mandibular third molar tooth.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with partially erupted and impacted third molars
  2. Medically compromised patients and pregnant females

Study design: Prior to this research, protocol of the study was approved by the ethical committee. A proforma was prepared for the collection of data. The parameters assessed included age, sex, etiology for tooth extraction. The etiology of tooth extraction was categorized into eight main categories:

  1. Severe caries / pulpal necrosis
  2. Severe periodontal disease
  3. Orthodontic reason
  4. Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth
  5. Teeth in line of fracture
  6. Preprosthetic extraction
  7. Teeth associated with pathologic lesion
  8. Preradiation therapy

Statistical Analysis: The data was entered into MS Office Excel 2016. The data obtained were statistically analysed and following content analysis the data were interpreted using percentage.


 

RESULT

Demographic Pattern

The male: female ratio was 1:1.11. Females outnumbered males Table 1A. The patient age ranged from 21to 80 years; most of the extraction was in the age group 21-30 years (n=90, 46.9%) followed by patients in the age group between 31-40 years (n=59, 30.7%). Age wise distribution of the injury is shown in Chart 1B

 

Table 1A: Gender wise distribution of patient with third molar extraction

Gender

Total number of patients

Male

86 (47.25%)

Female

96(52.7)

 

Table 1B: Age Wise Distribution of the Patients with third molar extraction

Age group

Total number of teeth extracted (n)

Percentage

21-30 years

90

46.9%

31-40 years

59

30.7%

41-50 years

22

11.5%

51-60 years

16

8.3%

61-70 years

4

2.1%

71-80 years

1

0.5%

TOTAL

192

100%

 

Number and percentage in different age groups

The most frequent tooth extracted was the mandibular third molar tooth (n=119). In the age group of 21-30 years most mandibular tooth were extracted [n=61 (51.2%)], and the least number in the age group of 71-80 years [n=1 (0.8%)]. A total of 73 maxillary third molars were extracted with maximum extraction in the 21-30 years age group [n=29 (39.7%)] and least in the 71-80 years age group [n=0 (0%)]. Table 2

 

Table 2: Number and percentage of third molar extraction in different age groups

AGE GROUP

mandibular third molar

(number (n) of teeth extracted and percentage)

maxillary third molar

(number (n) of teeth extracted and percentage)

21-30 YRS

61 (51.2%)

29 (39.7%)

31-40 YRS

35 (29.4%)

24 (32.8%)

41-50 YRS

12 (10.08%)

10 (13.6%)

51-60 YRS

8 (6.7%)

8 (10.9%)

61-70 YRS

2 (1.6%)

2 (2.73%)

71-80 YRS

1 (0.8%)

0 (0%)

TOTAL

119 (61.97%)

73 (38%)

 

Analysis of reasons for tooth extractions based on numbers and percentage

Table-3 enumerates the various reasons for tooth extraction. Severe caries / pulpal necrosis appeared to be the most common reason accounting for 117(60.9%) of total extractions. Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth were the second main reason resulting in 39 (20.3%) extraction. Severe periodontal disease was the third major reason resulting in 31 (16.14%) extractions. There were no extractions done for preradiation therapy, orthodontic reason and for teeth associated with pathologic lesion. Preprosthetic extraction accounted for 2.1 % and only 0.5% of the third molar teeth were removed due to the teeth being in the line of fracture.

 

Table 3:

Reasons for extraction

Total number of teeth extracted

Percentage

Severe caries / pulpal necrosis

117

60.9%

Severe periodontal disease

31

16.14%

Orthodontic reason

0

0%

Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth

39

20.3%

Teeth in line of fracture

1

0.5%

Preprosthetic extraction

4

2.1%

Teeth associated with pathologic lesion

0

0%

Preradiation therapy

0

0%

Total

192

100%

 

Analysis of Reasons for tooth extractions in different age groups

When reasons for extraction among different age groups were analyzed, it was found that severe caries/ pulpal necrosis was predominant reason (70%) for tooth loss in age group of 21-30 years. Severe periodontal disease was the most common reason (81.8%) in 41-50 years age group. Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth was the most common reason (28.9%) in 21-30 years age group. There were no extractions done for teeth associated with pathologic lesions, preradiation therapy and orthodontic reason. 1.1% teeth in the line of fracture were removed in the age group of 21-30 years. Majority of the preprosthetic extraction 2 (50%) were done in the 61-70 year age group.

Table 4:

Age group

Teeth extracted

Severe caries/ pulpal necrosis

Severe periodontal disease

Orthodontic reason

Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth

Teeth in line of fracture

Preprosthetic extraction

Teeth associated with pathologic lesion

Preradiation therapy

21-30

90

63 (70%)

0

0

26 (28.9%)

1(1.1%)

0

0

0

31-40

59

47(79.6%)

0

0

12(20.3%)

0

0

0

0

41-50

22

4(18.18%)

18(81.8%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

51-60

16

2(12.5%)

11(68.75%)

0

1(6.25%)

0

2(12.5%)

0

0

61-70

4

1(25%)

1(25%)

0

0

0

2(50%)

0

0

71-80

1

0

1(100%)

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

192

117

31

0

39

1

4

0

0

 


DISCUSSION

Third molar extraction is one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery5. World Health Organization (WHO) in its report identified good oral health as an indicator of good health and recommended various steps in order to improve oral health globally6. The present study consisted of 182 patients in which 96 females (52.7%) and 86 males (47.25%). This is consistent with the study done by Abed Al Hadi et al. 7 wherein females outnumbered males. The comparison of our results from other study is limited due the fact that majority of the article published focus on the reasons of extraction of partially or completely erupted third molar rather than the erupted tooth. Our results show that 46.9% of the teeth were extracted in the age group of 21-30 years followed by 30.7% in the age group of 31-40 years. This is consistent with the study done by CE Medina-Solis et al. 8. This can be due to the fact that the oral hygiene measures are not being followed properly by the younger individuals and also the older people might have lost their teeth at an early age9. The present study results show that the mandibular third molar 119 (61.97%) were more commonly extracted, than the maxillary third molars 73 (38%). The results of the study are consistent with the study done by Abed Al Hadi et al. 7, whereas the study done by CE Medina-Solis et al. 8 shows more incidence of maxillary third molar extraction than the mandibular. In this retrospective study it was found that more than half of the teeth that is 60.9% were extracted due to severe dental caries or pulpal necrosis. This finding is consistent with the study done by Anand etal10. This may be attributed to diet, socio-economic factors and level of dental awareness amongst the patients. Malopposed tooth/malpositioned tooth was identified as the second most common reason accounting for 20.3% of total extractions. This can be explained by the fact that mandibular third molars tend to occupy an abnormal position because of lack of space in the posterior mandible 11. Although teeth are primarily extracted due to disease such as dental caries and periodontal disease12,13,14 that can cause infection and pain, sometimes healthy teeth have to be sacrificed to improve chewing or for correction of malocclusions8. The same holds good for the maxillary third molar teeth. The third main reason for tooth removal was severe periodontal disease accounting for 16.14% of the total extraction. The finding is consistent with the study done by Abed Al Hadi et al. 7. In the present study 2.1% extractions were due to preprosthetic reason, which was the fourth main cause for teeth extraction. This result is not in accordance to the study by CE Medina-Solis et al. 8 where prosthetic extraction was the main reason for third molar removal. The last reason for extraction was the teeth being in the line of fracture 0.5%.

 

CONCLUSION

There were no extractions done for prophylactic reason. All the teeth extracted were associated with disease or were symptomatic. In the present study it was found that of the main reasons of tooth extractions was dental caries. Malopposed tooth/malpositioned teeth were second main reason for extraction. The third main reason was severe periodontal disease. The less number of preprosthetic extractions shows the attitude of patients towards prosthetic rehabilitation following tooth loss. We propose that third molars can be used to replace first and second molar if they are lost early. Dentists should emphasise on preventive measures that can be undertaken by patients in order to avoid caries and periodontal diseases so as to save the teeth whenever possible. Also the malopposed teeth should be extracted whenever identified so as to prevent further complications.

REFERENCES

  1. Larry J Peterson. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Fouth edition.
  2. Siddiqui S. R., Agrawal S., Monga H. S.,Gaur A. Prophylactic removal of the third molars: Justified or not. J Int Oral Health.2015; 7 (11): 132-5.
  3. Robert D. Marciani, DMD. Third Molar Removal: An Overview of Indications, Imaging, Evaluation, and Assessment of Risk. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 19 (2007) 1–13.
  4. Angelillo IF, Nobile CG, Pavia M. Survey of reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Italy. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996; 24(5):336-340.
  5. Normando D. Third molars: To extract or not to extract? Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 July-Aug;20(4):17-8.
  6. Petersen PE. The World health Report. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Program. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000-2003; (Suppl 1):3-21.
  7. Abed Al Hadi, Mansour Ali Qudah, Anwar Barakat Bataineh, Rima Ahmad Safadi. Reasons for Third Molar Teeth Extraction in Jordanian Adults. The Journal Of Contemporary Dental Practice. Volume 7, No. 5, November 1, 2006.
  8. CE Medina-Solis, M Mendoza-Rodriguez, S Marquez-Rodriguez, R De la Rosa-Santillana, R Islas-Zarazua, JdJ Navarrete-Hernandez, G Maupome. Reasons Why Erupted Third Molars Are Extracted in a Public University in Mexico. West Indian Med J 2014; 63 (4): 354.
  9. Hamasha AA, Sasa I, Al-Qudah M. Risk indicators associated with tooth loss in Jordanian adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28: 67-72.
  10. Anand PS, Kamath KP, Nair B. Trends in extraction of permanent teeth in private dental practices in Kerala State, India. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11: 41−8.
  11.  N.M.Ahmed, Speculand. Removal of ectopic mandibular third molar teeth: literature review and a report of three cases. Oral Surgery 5 (2012) 39–44.
  12. McCaul LK, Jenkins WM, Kay EJ. The reasons for the extraction of various tooth types in Scotland: a 15-year follow up. J Dent 2001; 29:401−7.
  13. Da’ameh D. Reasons for permanent tooth extraction in the North of Afghanistan. J Dent 2006; 34: 48−51.
  14. Aida J,Ando Y,Akhter R,Aoyama H, Masui M, Morita M. Reasons for permanent tooth extractions in Japan. J Epidemiol 2006; 16: 214−19.

Policy for Articles with Open Access:

Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Dentistry (Print ISSN: 2579-1125) (Online ISSN: 2636-4603) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.