Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 9 Issue 1 - January 2019

 

 

A study of various pre-malignant oral lesions and factors associated at tertiary health care centre

Anshu Kumar1*, Satish Kumar2

 

1Senior Resident, 2Professor and HOD, Department of ENT, Vardhmaan Institute of Medical Sciences, Pawapuri, Nalanda, Bihar, INDIA.

Email: anshu19802202@gmail.com, satish.kum07@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Premalignant oral lesions are at a great risk of developing oral cancers. Early detection of these lesions will have good prognosis and it is life-saving. This study aimed at finding risk factors for development of these lesions. Aim and objective: to study the various pre-malignant oral lesions and factors associated with it at tertiary health care centre. Methodology: 330 patients visiting surgical OPD with oral lesions were studied. These cases were studied as per WHO criteria for potentially malignant diseases. Data collection was done with pretested questionnaire. Data included sociodemographic data, detailed history and clinical examination. Various risk factors, site of involvement and grades of dysplasia were recorded. Data analysed with appropriate statistical tests. Results: Out of all 330 patients 44 patients showed premalignant oral lesions. Mean age of the patient was 45.16± 3.5 years. Male to female ratio was 2.1:1. Most commonly observed premalignant lesion was leukoplakia (68.17%) followed by oral lichen planus (13.67%). Tobacco chewing was most commonly observed in both males(21) and females(12). Most commonly involved site for premalignant oral lesions was bucal mucosa (54.54%) followed by tongue (27.27%).

Key Word: pre-malignant oral lesions.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

In India, oral cancer is one of the leading cancer today. Its incidence is 12.6 per 1,00,000 population.1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lesions and conditions of the oral mucosa, which may undergo malignant transformation are defined as a potentially malignant disorder (PMD)2. Various conditions like erythroplakia, lichen planus, oral submucosus fibrosis, actinic cheilitis and leukoplakia are described as potentially malignant disorders. In premalignant oral lesions risk factors are tobacco use, alcohol drinking, chewing of betel quid containing areca nut, and solar rays. Premalignant oral lesions may progress to dysplasia and carcinoma in situ if not diagnosed early. Various investigation modalities are available for diagnosis. Some of them are Local oral examination, application of toluidine blue to suspected lesion, cytological study, and tissue biopsy.

Early detection of these lesions is important as it can be life saving. Always prevention is better so this study was conducted to find associated risk factors in premalignant oral lesions.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was a cross sectional study carried out in outpatient department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care center. Study population was patients presented with complaints of oral lesions. Over a period of one year 330 patients with oral lesions were studied. These cases were studied as per WHO criteria for potentially malignant diseases. The clinical diagnosis involved WHO criteria for potentially malignant disorders and the classification of leukoplakia by Axell and four stage classification of van der Waal. The classification of oral leukoplakia was done according to size of oral lesion, its clinical presentation and histopathological features. Study was approved by ethical committee of the institute. A valid written consent was taken from the patients after explaining the study to them. Data was collected using pretested questionnaire. Data collection included sociodemographic profile of the patients. Detailed history and detailed clinical examination was done. The location of oral lesion, size, gross examination were done. Patient underwent appropriate investigations. Biopsy were taken, detailed histopathological features were noted. The tissue sections were stained with H and E stain. Data was analysed using appropriate statistical tests.

 

RESULTS

Out of all 330 patients 44 patients showed premalignant oral lesions. Mean age of the patient was 45.16± 3.5 years. Age ranged from 19 years to 75 years. one patient was diagnosed at age of 19 years. Most of the patients were from the age group of 51-60 years(27.27%) followed by 31-40 years(18.17%) and 61-70 years (18.17%). In our study 30 patients were males while 14 patients were females. Male to female ratio was 2.1:1. In our study most commonly observed premalignant lesion was leukoplakia (68.17%) followed by oral lichen planus (13.67%). Other lesions observed were oral submucous fibrosis (11.35%), erythroplakia (2.27%) and Actinic cheilitis (4.54%). Table 3 showed various risk factors for oral premalignant lesions. Tobacco chewing was most commonly observed in both males(21) and females(12). Second most common factor was alcohol with tobacco chewing it was observed in males only. Other risk factors involved were smoking and tobacco chewing. Smoking was not observed in females. 3 male patients had no addiction but still they had these lesions. Most commonly involved site for premalignant oral lesions was bucal mucosa (54.54%) followed by tongue (27.27%). Gingiva was found involved in 9.09% patients. Alveolus was site for premalignant oral lesions in 6.83% patients. One patient had lesions on lip contributing 2.27% of all study population. Table 4 showed grades of epithelial dysplasia in patients of premalignant oral lesions. 47.62% of patients had mild grade of epithelial dysplasia. 28.57% patients showed severe dysplasia.

 

Table 1: Distribution of patients of oral premalignant lesions according to age group

Age group

No of patients

Percentage

11-20

O1

2.27%

21-30

02

4.54%

31-40

08

18.17%

41-50

07

15.91%

51-60

12

27.27%

61-70

08

18.17%

>70

06

13.67%

Total

44

100%

 

Table 2: Distribution of patients of oral premalignant lesions according to type of lesion

Premalgnant lesions

No of patients

Percentage

Leukoplakia

30

68.17%

Oral lichen planus

06

13.67%

Oral submucous fibrosis

05

11.35%

Erythroplakia

01

2.27%

Actinic cheilitis

02

4.54%

Total

44

100%


Table 3: Distribution of patients of oral premalignant lesions according to risk factors and gender

Risk factors

Males

Females

Total

Tobacco chewing

21

12

33

Smoking + Tobacco chewing

01

00

01

Alcohol + Tobacco chewing

07

00

07

No addiction

03

00

03

Total

30

14

44

 

Table 4: Distribution of patients of oral premalignant lesions according to site of lesion

Site of lesions

No of patients

Percentage

Buccal mucosa

24

54.54%

Tongue

12

27.27%

Gingiva

04

9.09%

Alveolus

03

6.83%

Lip

01

2.27%

Total

44

100%

 

Table 5: Distribution of patients of oral premalignant lesions according to grades of epithelial dysplasia

Grades of epithelial dysplasia

No of patients

Percentage

Mild

10

47.62%

Moderate

05

23.81%

Severe

06

28.57%

Total

21

100%

 

DISCUSSION

Out of all 330 patients 44 patients showed premalignant oral lesions. Mean age of the patient was 45.16± 3.5 years. Age ranged from 19 years to 75 years. Most of the patients were from the age group of 51-60 years(27.27%) followed by 31-40 years(18.17%) and 61-70 years (18.17%) Prolonged exposure to the risk factors or carcinogen can be the cause for this prevalence. Similar results were seen in Mehrotra R et al where they observed the mean age of presentation was 54.5 year. Maximum number of cases were seen in sixth decade.3 In our study 30 patients were males while 14 patients were females. Male to female ratio was 2.1:1. Similar results were observed in Dietrich T, et al where they found 65.78% male patients and 34.21% female patients.4 In our study most commonly observed premalignant lesion was leukoplakia (68.17%) followed by oral lichen planus (13.67%). Two subtypes including homogeneous and non-homogeneous types5. Homogenous lesions are characterized by uniformly flat, thin, uniformly white in colour and shows shallow cracks of the surface keratin2,5. Nonhomogenous lesions have been defined as a white and red lesion (known as erythroleukoplakia) that may be either irregularly flat (speckled) or nodular. Other lesions observed were oral submucous fibrosis (11.35%), erythroplakia (2.27%) and Actinic cheilitis (4.54%). Similar results were observed in previous studies.6,7 Tobacco chewing was most commonly observed in both males (21) and females(12). Second most common factor was alcohol with tobacco chewing it was observed in males only. Other risk factors involved were smoking and tobacco chewing. Similarly, previous studies showed tobacco, smoking and alcohol were common risk factors.8,9 These risk factor leads to hyperplastic or dysplastic squamous epithelial lesions which progress to carcinoma in situ to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Most commonly involved site for premalignant oral lesions was bucal mucosa (54.54%) followed by tongue (27.27%). Similarily Mehta FS et al and Axell et al observed buccal mucosa as commonest site involved.8,10.

 

CONCLUSION

Tobacco chewing, smoking and alcohol are most common risk factors in premalignant oral lesions. These lesions should be diagnosed as early as possible.

REFERENCES

  1. Elango JK, Gangadharan P, Sumithra S, Kuriakose MA. Trends of head and neck cancers in urban and rural India. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention. 2006;7(1):108-12.
  2. Warnakula suriya S, Johnson NW, van der Waal I. Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 2007; 36: 575-80.
  3. Mehrotra R, Gupta A, Singh M, Ibrahim R. Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant and malignant oral lesions. Molecular Cancer. 2006;5(11):476-98.
  4. Dietrich T, Reichart PA, Scheifelea C. Clinical risk factors of oral leucoplakia in a representative sample of the US population. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:158-63.
  5. van der Waal I. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa; terminology, classification and present concepts of management. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 317-323.
  6. Sharma P, Saxena S, Aggarwal P. Trends in the epidemiology of oral squamous cell carcinoma in western UP: an institutional study. Ind J Dent Res. 2010;21(3):316-9.
  7. Mishra M, Mohanty J, SenguptaS, Tripathy S. Epidemiological and clinicopathological study of oral leucoplakia. Ind J Dermatol Venerol Leprosy. 2005;71(3):161-5.
  8. Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ, Gupta PC, Daftary DK. Epidemiologic and histologic study of oral cancer and leucoplakia among 50,915 villagers in India. Cancer. 1969;24:832-49.
  9.  Khandekar SP, Bagdey PS, Tiwari RR. Oral cancer and some epidemiological factors: A hospital based study. Indian J Community Med. 2006;31:157-9.
  10. Axell T. Occurrence of leukoplakia and some other oral white lesions among 20,333 adult Swedish people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15:46-51.