Comparative study of complications associated with femoral and radial approach for coronary angiography

 

Hemant Kokane¹, Neha Suryawanshi^2*

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Barton M, Gruntzig J, Husmann M, et al.: Balloon angioplasty - The legacy of Andreas Grüntzig, M.D. (1939–1985). Front Cardiovasc Med. 2014, 1:15.
2. Sinha SK, Mishra V, Afdaali N, et al.: Coronary angiography safety between transradial and transfemoral access. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016, 2016:1-7.
3. Kedev S, Kalpak O, Dharma S, et al.: Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014, 26:475–482.
4. Roussanov O, Wilson SJ, Henley K, et al.: Cost-effectiveness of the radial versus femoral artery approach to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007, 19:349–353.
5. Pasley TF, Khan A, Yen LY, et al.: Left radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016, 28:81–84.
6. Williams PD, Palmer S, Judkins C, et al.: Right and left heart catheterization via an antecubital fossa vein and the radial artery--a prospective study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014, 26:669–673.
7. Slawin J, Kubler P, Szczepanski A, et al.: Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue. Postep Kardiol Inter. 2013, 9:353–361.
8. Aamir S, Mohammed S, Sudhir R: Transradial approach for coronary procedures in the elderly population. J GeriatrCardiol. 2016, 13:798–806.
9. Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, et al.: The transradial versus the transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EAPCI. 2012, 8:501–510.
10. Fa'ak F, Shabaneh B, Younis G: Direct measurement of left atrial pressure during routine transradial catheterization. Tex Heart Inst. 2016, 43:503–506.
11. Rao SV, Eikelboom JA, Granger CB, et al.: Bleeding and blood transfusion issues in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007, 28:1193–1204.
12. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am CollCardiol. 1998; 32:572e576.
13. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999; 138:430e436.
14. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am CollCardiol. 1997; 29:1269e1275.
15. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation, Annals of the ICRP, publication 74, volume 26(3). Oxford and New York: Elsevier; 1997.
16. Hirshfield JW, Balter S, Brinker JA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimise patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/ American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. Circulation 2005; 111:511–32.
17. S. S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns et al., “Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomized, parallel group, multicentre trial,” The Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9775, pp. 1409– 1420, 2011.
18. F. Philippe, F. Larrazet, T. Meziane, and A. Dibie, “Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2004.
19. C. Pristipino, F. Pelliccia, A. Granatelli et al., “Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral artery,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1216–1221, 2007.
20. C. Pristipino, C. Trani, M. S. Nazzaro et al., “Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study,” Heart, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 476–482, 2009.
21. Santosh Kumar Sinha, Vikas Mishra, NasarAfdaali, et al., “Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2016, Article ID 4013843, 7 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4013843.
22. Tewari S, Sharma N, Kapoor A, Syal SK, Kumar S, Garg N, Goel PK. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral artery approach for percutaneous coronary angiography and angioplasty: a retrospective seven-year experience from a north Indian center. Indian Heart J. 2013 Jul-Aug;65(4):378-87.
23. Y. Louvard, H. Benamer, P. Garot et al., “Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty inOctogenarians (theOCTOPLUS study),”TheAmerican Journal of Cardiology, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1177–1180, 2004.
24. G. Plourde, S. B. Pancholy, J. Nolan et al., “Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 10009, pp. 2192–2203, 2015.
25. P. Agostoni, G. G. L. Biondi-Zoccai, M. L. de Benedictis et al., “Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronarydiagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overviewandmeta-analysis of randomized trials,” Journal of theAmericanCollege of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 349–356, 2004.
26. C. Brasselet, T. Blanpain, S. Tassan-Mangina et al., “Comparisonof operator radiation exposure with optimized radiationprotection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hocpercutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoralroutes,” European Heart Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2008.
27. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. CircCardiovascInterv 2011; 4:336–41.
28. Osama Tayeh, Federica Ettori.Coronary angiography safety between radial and femoral access. The Egyptian Heart Journal. 2014; 66(2):149-154.
29. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am CollCardiol 2012; 60:2481–9.
30. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, et al. Consensus document on theradial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paperby the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventionsand Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of theEuropean Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 2013; 8:1242–51.
31. Komócsi A, Aradi D, Kehl, et al.: Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Med Sci. 2014, 10:203–212.