Table of Content - Volume 6 Issue 1 - April 2017
Clinical profile of pyelonephritis in patients with diabetes mellitus
Shripad Vithalrao Dhanorkar1, Balasaheb Eknathrao Karad2*
1Associate Professor, 2Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Gouri Devi Institute of medical sciences, Rajbandh, Durgapur, West Bengal, INDIA.
Abstract Background: Acute pyelonephritis is defined as bacterial or fungal infection of renal parenchyma and collecting system. Acute pyelonephritis was otherwise called acute focal pyelonephritis or acute focal bacterial nephritis or acute lobar nephronia Aims and objectives: to study Clinical profile of pyelonephritis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methodology: After approval from institutional ethical committee a cross-sectional study was carried out in the department of Medicine at tertiary health care centre during the two year period i.e. January 2016 to January 2018 in the diabetic patients who were referred for the pyelonephritis were studied by taking the informed consent of the patients. All the patients received treatment as per the standard protocols and at the end outcome in the patients like Survival with Nephrectomy Survival without Nephrectoy, Expired etc. seen. Result: The majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 i.e. 33.33%, followed by 40-50. 25.00%, 30-40 were 19.44%, >60 were 13.89%, 20-30 were 8.33%. The majority of the patients were male i.e. 69.44% and female were 30.56%. The most common clinical feature was Fever i.e. 90% followed by Dysurea -85%. Altered sensorium in 79%, Renal dysfunction -53%,UTI -49%, Shock -38%, Leucocytosis-29% Thrombocytopenia -21%, Renal Stone -11%, The Culture +ve patients were -93%, E. coli -87%, K. pneumonia in 13%, Pseudomonas -10%, Polymicrobial -7%, Fungal-5%, Culture –ve in 3%. As per the outcome patients Survived with Nephrectomy in 70%, Survived without Nephrectoy in 27%, Expired -3% Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 40-50 and affecting mostly to males, the most common clinical features were Fever, Dysurea, Altered sensorium, Renal dysfunction, UTI, Shock, Leucocytosis Thrombocytopenia, Renal Stone on culture the most common organism s were E. coli, K. pneumonia and majority of the patients survived with the surgical treatment like nephrectomy. Key Words: Pyelonephritis, diabetes mellitus, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), Renal dysfunction
INTRODUCTION Acute pyelonephritis is defined as bacterial or fungal infection of renal parenchyma and collecting system. Acute pyelonephritis was otherwise called acute focal pyelonephritis or acute focal bacterial nephritis or acute lobar nephronia.1 To bring in uniformity in des- cription, the Society of Uroradiology recom- mended that all the parenchymal abnormalities with no abscess attributable to acute infection be called acute pyelonephritis and the severity to be described under the following: (a) unilateral/bilateral, (b) focal/diffuse, (c) focal swelling/no focal swelling and (d) renal enlarge- ment/no renal enlargement.2 Acute pyelonephritis in patients with diabetes mellitus is severe and may present as septicemia with acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI in acute pyelonephritis can occur either due to sepsis or due to direct infection of the renal parenchyma bilaterally
MATERIAL AND METHODS After approval from institutional ethical committee a cross-sectional study was carried out in the department of Medicine at tertiary health care centre during the two year period i.e. January 2016 to January 2018 in the diabetic patients who were referred for the pyelonephritis were studied by taking the informed consent of the patients. All the patients studied thoroughly, all details like age, sex, clinical features and all the patients undergone culture for the microbiology. All the patients received treatment as per the standard protocols and at the end outcome in the patients like Survival with Nephrectomy Survival without Nephrectoy, Expired etc. seen.
RESULT
Table 1: Distribution of the patients as per the age
The majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 i.e. 33.33%, followed by 40-50 25.00%, 30-40 were 19.44%, >60 were 13.89%, 20-30 were 8.33%.
Table 2: Distribution of the patients as per the sex
The majority of the patients were male i.e. 69.44% and female were 30.56%.
Table 3: Distribution of the patients as per the clinical features
(*More than one clinical features were present in the patients) The most common clinical feature was Fever i.e. 90% followed by Dysurea -85%, Altered sensorium in 79%, Renal dysfunction -53%, UTI -49%, Shock -38%, Leucocytosis-29% Thrombocytopenia -21%, Renal Stone -11%.
Table 4: Distribution of the patients as per the culture
The Culture +ve patients were -93%, E. coli -87%, K. pneumonia in 13%, Pseudomonas -10% Polymicrobial -7%, Fungal-5%, Culture –ve in 3%.
Table 5: Distribution of the patients as per the outcome
As per the outcome patients Survived with Nephrectomy in 70%, Survived without Nephrectoy in 27%, Expired -3%
DISCUSSION DM is a common predisposing factor for UTI. In comparison to nondiabetics, epidemiological studies have shown that the relative risk of UTI in diabetics increases by a factor of 1.2-2.2.4,5Among hospitalized patients with acute pyelonephritis, DM has been shown to be the single most common predisposing cause.3 The severity of UTIs is also increased in DM; the mean hospitalization rate in patients with acute pyelonephritis was found to be 3.4-24. One times higher in diabetics than nondiabetics.6 Pyelonephritis in DM tends to be more frequently bilateral and is associated with greater complications. Emphysematous pyelonephritis is a severe, necrotizing renal infection with potential to cause high morbidity and mortality, particularly if the diagnosis (and subsequent percutaneous/surgical intervention) is delayed. Hyperglycemia has been postulated as an important factor for the formation of gas in the renal parenchyma, probably because gas formation requires anaerobic metabolism of glucose.8,9,10surgical therapy was thought to be the gold standard for treating EPN until the early 1990s. PCD along with antibiotics has been increasingly recognized over the last two decades for treating EPN.7, 11,12,13The majority of the patients were in the age group of 50-60 i.e. 33.33%, followed by 40-50. 25.00%, 30-40 were 19.44%, >60 were 13.89%, 20-30 were 8.33%. The majority of the patients were male i.e. 69.44% and female were 30.56%. The most common clinical feature was Fever i.e. 90% followed by Dysurea -85%. Altered sensorium in 79%, Renal dysfunction -53%,UTI -49%, Shock -38%, Leucocytosis-29% Thrombocytopenia -21%, Renal Stone -11%, The Culture +ve patients were -93%, E. coli -87%, K. pneumonia in 13%, Pseudomonas -10%, Polymicrobial -7%, Fungal-5%, Culture –ve in 3%. As per the outcome patients Survived with Nephrectomy in 70%, Survived without Nephrectoy in 27%, Expired -3% These findings are similar to P Dutta et al 14 they found A total of 105 diabetic patients with pyelonephritis were admitted from July 2010 to June 2012. Patients were treated with appropriate antibiotics and percutaneous drainage (PCD) as indicated. Nephrectomy was carried out in patients of EPN who were refractory to conservative measures. NEPN and EPN were seen in 79 (75.2%) and 26 (24.7%) patients, respectively. Escherichia coli was the most common organism. Pyelonephritis was associated with renal abscess and papillary necrosis in 13 (12.4%) and 4 (3.8%) patients with EPN and NEPN, respectively. Worsening of renal functions were seen in 92 and 93% of patients with EPN and NEPN, respectively. Class 1 EPN was seen in 2 (7.7%), Class II in 8 (30.7%), IIIa in 7 (27%), IIIb in 5 (19.3), and IV in 4 (15.4%) patients. Antibiotics alone were sufficient in 38.5% of EPN versus 62% in NEPN
CONCLUSION It can be concluded from our study that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 40-50 and affecting mostly to males, the most common clinical features were Fever, Dysurea, Altered sensorium, Renal dysfunction, UTI, Shock, Leucocytosis Thrombocytopenia, Renal Stone on culture the most common organism s were E. coli, K. pneumonia and majority of the patients survived with the surgical treatment like nephrectomy.
REFERENCES
Policy for Articles with Open Access
|
|