Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 7 Issue 2 - August 2017


 

Clinical profile of patients of nonorganophosphate and nonorganochlorine compounds poisoning

 

Akash Shivshankar Swami1, Sachin Aujenath Chaudhari2*

 

Department of Medicine, SRTR Medical College and Hospital, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: akashswami03@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Objectives: 1) To study the clinical profile of patients of nonorganophosphate and nonorganochlorine compounds poisoning. 2) To study the clinical manifestations and outcome of different poisonings. Material and methods: Patients of nonorganophosphate and nonorganochlorine compounds poisoning admitted over 24 months in a tertiary care hospital were studied for clinical profile and outcome. Results: Among 155 patients, 37.4% of patients were between 3rd and 4th decade and 29.03% of patients were between 1st and 2nd decade. Eighty-one patients were male and 74 were females. There was no significant difference according to gender (p = 0.838). About 92.09% were due to suicidal intention and 5.16 were accidental in nature; 1.93% occurred under the influence of alcohol. The route of exposure was oral in all patients (100%). About 26.45% were manual laborers, 23.87% were housewives, 21.29% were farmers and 18.06% were students. Most common poisoning was rodenticide poisoning (49.03%); 6.38% patients (13) died (p = 0.822). Conclusions: There was no significant gender difference. The route of exposure was oral in all. The most common poisoning was rodenticide poisoning. The most common intention was suicidal and most patients survived.

Key Words: Organophosphate, organochlorine, oral, suicidal, rodenticide.

 

INTRODUCTION

Poison is a substance that causes damage or injury to the body andendangers one's life due to its exposure by means of ingestion, inhalation, or contact.1 Worldwide various agents such as agrochemicals, drugs or environmental agents are used as poisoning agents.2 Worldwide intentional poisoning is one of the important causes for mortality and morbidity.3 World Health Organization (WHO) estimated 0.3 million peopledie every year due to various poisoning agents.4 According to World Health Organization (WHO), globally more than three million of acute poisoning cases with 2, 20,000 deaths occur annually.5 It has been estimated that, in India five to six persons per lakh of population die due to acute poisoning every year.6 Poisoning is the fourth common cause of mortality in India.7 Acute pesticide poisoning is one of the most common causes of intentional deaths worldwide.8 High doses of analgesics, tranquillizers, and antidepressants are the commonly used agents for intentional poisoning in industrialized countries.9 Agriculture is major profession in the rural part of India farmers stock the pesticides to eradicate the weeds and pests. Due to easy availability of the pesticides, they are commonly used by the individuals to end their life in stressful situations.19 Pattern of poisoning in a region depends on various factors which include availability and access to the poison, socioeconomic status of an individual, cultural and religious influences, etc. Therefore, regional epidemiological data on poisoning are very helpful in planning rational use of resources for the prevention and management of poisoning and in targeting research. Against this background, the present study was undertaken to know spectrum and clinical profile of acute poisoning due to various non organophosphate and non organochlorine compounds.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was conducted in 155 patients of nonorganophosphate and nonorganochlorine compounds poisoning admitted in a tertiary care hospital during a study period of 24 months. This study was observational and patients from wards and ICU were selected, protocol was explained to patients and informed written consent at one time with help of inclusion criteria. A synopsis of the study protocol was submitted to the institutional ethics committee and approval was obtained. All necessary investigative work up done and clinical profile and outcome of different poisonings studied.

 

RESULTS

It was found that 37.41% of patients were in between 2nd and 3rd and 29.03% of patients were in between 1st and 2nd decade. 81% were males and 74% were females. P = 0.838 suggests that there was no significant difference in incidence of poisoning according to gender in each of age groups. Most of poisonings (92.09%) were due to suicidal intention and 5.16% were accidental in nature. About 1.93% of total poisonings occurred under the influence of alcohol. The mode of exposure was oral in all (100%) patients.

Table 1: Distribution of study subjects as per types of poisoning

Compound

No. of Patients

(%) Patients

Rodenticide

76

49.03%

Drug overdosages

27

17.41%

Herbicides

14

9.03%

Pyrethroids

9

5.80%

Kerosene

5

3.22%

Corrosives

4

2.58%

Imidacloprid

4

2.58%

Mosquito repellent

4

2.58%

Phenyl

4

2.58%

Dettol

3

1.93%

Castor seed

2

1.29%

Plant poisoning

1

0.64%

Amitraz

1

0.64%

Nitrobenzene

1

0.64%

Total

155

100%

Most common poisoning was due to rodenticides, n = 76 (49.03%) followed by drug overdosages, n = 27 (17.41%) followed by herbicides, n = 14 (9.03%).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Distribution of study subjects as per duration of ICU stay

Duration of ICU Stay in days

No. of patients (Total 155)

(%) Patients

0

118

76.12%

1

12

7.74%

2

6

3.87%

3

5

3.22%

5

8

5.16%

7

5

3.22%

11

1

0.64%

Total

155

100

Average duration of hospital stay was 3.3 days and average duration of ICU stay was 2.3 days. Total, n = 37 (23.87%) patients required ICU care.

 

Table 3: Distribution of study subjects as per outcome

Outcome

Female

Male

Total

P Value

Survived

63

65

128

0.520

Died

6

7

13

0.849

DAMA

4

6

10

0.598

Absconded

1

2

3

0.606

Referred to Higher centre

-

1

1

-

Total

74

81

155

-

Most (82.58%) patients survived. Overall mortality was n = 13 (8.38%). As p = 0.822, gender was not making any significant effect on mortality. Maximum mortality was due to rodenticides, n = 11 out of 76 cases (14.47%) followed by herbicides, n = 2 out of 14 cases (14.28%).

 

Table 4: Clinical manifestations and outcome of rodenticide poisoning

Variables

No. of patients (%)

Sex

Male

35(46.05%)

Female

41(53.94%)

Signs and symptoms

Vomiting

76(100%)

Abdominal pain

70(92.10%)

Palpitation

30(39.47%)

Respiratory distress

16(21.05%)

Arrythmia

12(15.78%)

Hypotention

10(13.15%)

Oliguria

8(10.52%)

V.Tach

4(5.26%)

ICU Requirement

20(26.31%)

Mechanical ventilation

14(18.42%)

Investigations

Deranged LFTS

34(44.73%)

Deranged PT

30(39.47%)

Deranged RFTS

8(10.52%)

Outcome

Survived

61(80.26%)

Died

11(14.47%)

DAMA

4(5.26%)

Rodenticide poisoning was seen in n = 76 (49.03%) patients of which 53.94% were females and 46.05% were males. Most common symptoms were vomiting in 100% and abdominal pain in 92.10%, palpitation in 39.47%, respiratory distress in 21.05% patients. Liver function tests were deranged in 44.73% of patients and prothrombin time was deranged in 39.47% patients. Renal function tests were deranged in 10.52% patients. Arrhythmias were seen in 15.78% patients; 26.31% patients required ICU care and mechanical ventilation was required in 18.42% patients. Mortality was highest with rodenticide poisoning, with overall mortality of 14.47%.

Figure 1: Distribution of study subjects according to occupation

About 26.45% patients were manual laborers, 23.87% were housewives, 21.29% were farmers and 18.06% were students.

 

DISCUSSION

In the study period of 24 months 155 cases were evaluated for their clinical presentation, spectrum of poisoning and their outcome. In this study we found that maximum number of patients were from age group 21-30 n=58(37.41%) followed by 12-20 n=45(29.03%) followed by 31-40 n=39 (25.16%). In Pawar et al study incidence of poisoning was maximum among young adults, age group of 20-29 years comprising 421 (45.62%) cases. Ramesha et al (144) studied total of 136 patients and most cases of acute poisoning presented in the age group between 20 and 29 years (31.2%) followed by 12 to 19 year age group (30.2%). In our study we found that most of the patients of poisoning were manual labourer n=41 (26.45%) followed by housewives n=37 (23.87%), farmers n=33(21.29%), student n=28(18.06%), unemployed n=10 (6.45%), shopper n=4 (2.58%), driver n=2 (1.29%). Similarconclusion seen in Maharani et al study with labourers (18.66%) and farmers (13.33%) followed by house wives (28%). Ramesha et al in their study found that 44.8% (61) of the cases were manual labourers followed by housewives 13.2% (18), students 12.5% (17). In this study we found that most common poisoning was due to rodenticides with total number of patients n=76(49.03%) followed by drug overdosages n=27(17.41%) followed by herbicides n=14(9.03%), and pyrethroids n=9(5.80%). Jesslin et al mentioned pesticides (39.5%) as most common poisoning followed by medicines (26.1%), household products (22.1%), while Garg et al in their study mentioned aluminium phosphide was the leading cause of poisoning (36.8%) followed by insecticides (31.6%).In this study most of poisonings were due to suicidal intention n=144(92.06%), followed by accidental n=8(5.16%), alcohol influence n=3(1.93%). Similar was seen with Srivastava et al study. In this study majority of patients were survived n=128(82.58%), overall mortality was n=13(8.38%). Out of these females were n=6 and males were n=7. Mortality was similar in males and females as p= 0.822(statistical test used is two proportion test) so gender is not making significant effect on overall outcome. Pawar et al concluded similar results with 91(9.85%) cases died, 832 (90.15%) cases survived. In our study mortality was seen highest among rodenticide patients n=11 out of 76 (14.47%), followed by herbicide n=2 out of 14 patients (14.28%). Out of total 76 rodenticide poisoning patients males were n=35(46.05%) and females were n=41(53.94%). Symptoms of poisoning which were commonly found were vomiting n=76(100%), abdominal pain n=70(92.10%), followed by palpitation n=30(39.47%), respiratory distress n=16(21.05%). Chugh et al study showed vomiting (100%), pain in abdomen (100%), palpitation and sweating (80%), dyspnea and tachypnea (75%). Young age, suicidal intensions and easy availability of pesticides were main resons seen in poisoning cases, so efforts needs to be directed to improve overall socio economic and educational status of aggrecultural sector.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Thomas WF, John HD, Willium RH. Stedman's Medical Dictonery. 28th ed. New York: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2007. p. 2004.
  2. Hempestead K. Manner of death and circumstances in fatal poisoning: Evidence from New Jersey. Inj Prev. 2006; 12:44.
  3. Eddleston M, Phillips MR. Self poisoning with pesticides. BMJ. 2004; 328:42–4.
  4. Thundiyil JG, Stober J, Besbelli N, Pronczuk J. Acute pesticide poisoning: a proposed classification tool. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86:205–9.
  5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for poison control Bulletin 1999; Geneva: World Health Organisation.
  6. Reddy K S (2010).Toxicology, General consideration. In: NarayanaReddy K S. Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (pp. 446-465). Suguna Devi: Hyderabad, Inc.
  7. Unikrishnan B, Singh B, Rajeev A. Trends of acute poisoning in south Karnataka. Katmandu University Medical journal.2005; Vol 3, No.2, 10: 149- 154.
  8. Konradsen F, Dawson AH, Eddleston M, Gunnell D. Pesticide self-poisoning: thinking outside the box. Lancet. 2007; 369:169–70.
  9. McClure GM. Suicide in children and adolescents in England and Wales 1970- 1998. Br J Psychiatry. 2001; 178:469–74.
  10. Aaron R, Joseph A, Abraham S, Muliyil J, George K, Prasad J, et al. Suicides in young people in rural southern India. Lancet. 2004 Apr 3; 363(9415):1117-8.
  11. Pawar V, Murkey P, Tirpude B.Trends of poisoning cases at medical college and hospital in central india during period May 2007 to April 2009,‟ Journal of forensic medicine, Science And Law, Volume 20, Number 1, 2011:11-22.
  12. Ramesha KN, Krishnamurthy B. H, Ganesh S. Kumar. Pattern and outcome of acute poisoning cases in a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka, India‟.Indian J Crit Care Med July-September 2009, Vol 13, Issue 3, 152- 155.
  13. Maharani B, Vijayakumari N. Profile of poisoning cases in a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu, India‟. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 3 (01), pp. 091-094, January, 2013.
  14. Jesslin J, Adepu R, Churi S. Assessment of Prevalence and Mortality Incidences Due to Poisoning in a South Indian Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital,‟ Indian Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010 Sep-Oct; 72(5): 587–591.
  15. Garg V, Verma SK. Trends of Poisoning in Rural Area of South-West,‟ Punjab Journal of indian academy of forensic medicine 32.3 (July-september 2010):189-93..
  16. Srivastava A, Peshin SS, Kaleekal T, Gupta SK. An epidemiological study of poisoning cases reported to the National Poisons Information Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi‟. Hum Exp Toxicol.Jun 2005; 24(6):279-85.
  17. Chugh SN, Arora V, Sharma A, Chugh K. Free radical scavengers and lipid peroxidation in acute aluminium phosphide poisoning‟ Indian J MedicalResearch, Aug 1996;104:190-193.

 


 

 


 

 

 


 


 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.