Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 8 Issue 2 - November 2017


 

A study of reasons for delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis amongst newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients

 

Anil Maske1, Sadanand Kamble2*, S V Birajdar3

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRTR Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

2Assistant Professor, 3Professor and HOD, Department of Medicine, SRTR Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: sadakamble@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background:  Tuberculosis (TB) is a major infectious killer especially in developing country like India because of its peculiar socio-economic and demographic diversity. The delay in diagnosis poses a greater increase in morbidity and mortality leading to further complicating the TB situation in our country. Aims and objectives: To study reasons for delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis amongst newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Methodology: A cross sectional, descriptive study of sputum smear positive 100 patients, who were interviewed by using a predesigned questionnaire. The data obtained is then statistically analysed. Results: The significant risk factors independently associated with patient delay were: age >60 years (p<0.05), female sex (p<0.05), illiteracy (p<0.05), unemployment (p<0.05), place of first presentation being private health facility (p<0.05), following traditional treatment with home remedies and over the counter drugs (p<0.05) and an unsatisfactory knowledge score about tuberculosis (p<0.05). Also the significant risk factors independently associated with health system delay were: female sex (p<0.05), place of first presentation being private health facility (p<0.05), and cough being the presenting symptom (p<0.05). Conclusion: A high degree of tuberculosis among patients presenting with cough of 2 weeks duration and subjecting such patients for sputum microscopy should be a routine practice Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of anti-TB treatment is the key to success for TB disease and its control.

Key words: Diagnosis, Tuberculosis.

 

INTRODUCTION

Although Tuberculosis (TB) is a preventable and curable disease, it remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. As per Global TB Report 2017, India caters for one fourth of global TB cases with 2.8 lakhs incident cases, out of which 4.3 lakhs people died of the disease and 1.47 lakh people were diagnosed to have Multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB)/ Rifampicin- resistant TB (RR-TB). 1 The problem has been again getting worse by the rise in MDR-TB and Extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB) globally as well as in India. Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment are essential for an effective TB control programme. Delay in diagnosis is significant to both disease prognosis at the individual level and transmission within the community.

 

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To study the various reasons for delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis amongst patients who are newly diagnosed cases of pulmonary tuberculosis.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross sectional, descriptive study of sputum smear positive patients attending TB and Chest Diseases Hospital of Govt. Medical College, Amritsar was performed from 1st June 2011 to 31st May 2012 for a study period of one year after taking approval from ethical committee. The inclusion criterias for the patients under study were as follows:

  • Sputum smear positivity (Newly diagnosed cases of Pulmonary TB)
  • Age >15 years and
  • Duration of symptoms >2 weeks.

A total of 100 patients were interviewed by using a predesigned questionnaire after taking informed consent and strict confidentiality was maintained regarding their identity and responses. The qualitative data thus obtained was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using Chi-square test without Yate’s correction so as to know the association was significant or not i.e. ‘p’ value was calculated.

 

OBSERVATIONS

A total of 100 cases of tuberculosis aged 15 to 72 years attending TB and Chest Diseases Hospital were included in this study to evaluate the health seeking behaviour and to assess their knowledge regarding tuberculosis disease. The observations of the study as tabulated and are as follows.


 

Table 1: Duration of symptoms before first presentation (Patient delay):

Duration of symptoms

No. of cases

% age

≤1 month

32

32.0

>1 month

68

68.0

Total

100

100.0

 

Table 2: Duration from first presentation to the start of treatment (Health system delay)

Duration

No. of cases

%age

≤15 days

32

32.0

>15 days

68

68.0

Total

100

100.0

 

Table 3: Type of services obtained at first presentation

Type of services

No. of cases

%age

Referred to other level

45

45.0

Advice only

02

02.0

Other non-ATT drugs given

86

86.0

Sputum taken for examination

36

36.0

X-ray examination

22

22.0

Other tests

29

29.0

 

Table 4: Patient Delay and its factors among study subjects

Sr. No

Characteristics

≤1 month delay n

Table 4: Patient Delay and its factors among stud (%)

>1 month delay

n (%)

Total

‘p’ value

1

Age

<60 years

>60 years

 

27 (51.92%)

05 (10.42%)

 

25 (48.07%)

43 (89.58%)

 

52

48

 

 

<0.05

2

Sex

Male

Female

 

16 (42.10%)

16 (25.81%)

 

22 (57.89%)

46 (74.19%)

 

38

62

 

<0.05

3

Educational Status

Illiterate

Literate

 

04 (06.34%)

28 (75.68%)

 

59 (93.66%)

09 (24.32%)

 

63

37

 

<0.05

4

Occupation

Employed

Unemployed

 

20 (66.66%)

12 (17.14%)

 

10 (33.33%)

58 (80.56%)

 

30

70

 

<0.05

5

Addictions

Yes

No

 

04 (20.0%)

28 (35.0%)

 

16 (80.0%)

52 (65.0%)

 

20

80

 

>0.05

6

Distance to first health facility

<2 km

>2 km

 

 

28 (33.33%)

04 (25.0%)

 

 

56 (66.67%)

12 (75.0%)

 

 

84

16

 

 

>0.05

7

Place of first presentation

Private hospital

Govt. hospital

 

 

11 (17.19%)

21 (58.33%)

 

 

53 (82.81%)

15 (41.67%)

 

 

64

36

 

 

<0.05

 

8

Major reasons as reported by patients

 

 

 

 

  • Assuming symptoms may disappear by itself

Yes

No

 

 

 

 

28 (29.79%)

04 (66.67%)

 

 

 

 

66 (70.21%)

02 (33.33%)

 

 

 

 

94

06

 

 

 

 

>0.05

  • Following traditional treatment

Yes

No

 

 

05 (7.63%)

27 (81.82%)

 

 

62 (92.54%)

06 (18.18%)

 

 

67

33

 

 

<0.05

 

Total

 

32 (32.0%)

68 (68.0%)

100

 

 

Table 5: Health system Delay and its factors among the study subjects

Sr. No

Characteristics

≤15 days

n (%)

>15 days

n (%)

Total

‘p’ value

1.

Age

<60 years

>60 years

 

20 (38.46%)

12 (25.0%)

 

32 (61.53%)

36 (75.0%)

 

52

48

 

 

>0.05

2.

Sex

Males

Females

 

18 (47.37%)

14 (22.58%)

 

20 (52.63%)

48 (77.42%)

 

38

62

 

<0.05

3.

Marital status

Married

Single

 

30 (35.71%)

02 (12.50%)

 

54 (64.29%)

14 (87.50%)

 

84

16

 

>0.05

4.

Addictions

Yes

No

 

03 (15.0%)

29 (36.25%)

 

17 (85.0%)

51 (63.75%)

 

20

80

 

>0.05

 

5.

Place of first presentation

Govt.

Private

 

 

28 (77.78%)

04 (06.24%)

 

 

08 (22.22%)

60 (93.76%)

 

 

36

64

 

 

<0.05

6.

Place where diagnosis is confirmed?

Govt.

Private

 

 

 

30 (38.97%)

02 (08.70%)

 

 

 

47 (61.03%)

21 (91.30%)

 

 

 

77

23

 

 

 

<0.05

7.

Which symptoms made the patients approach the doctor?

Cough

Other than cough

 

 

 

 

27 (28.72%)

05 (83.33%)

 

 

 

 

67 (71.28%)

01 (16.67%)

 

 

 

 

94

06

 

 

 

 

<0.05

8.

Chronic medical illness

Yes

No

 

 

03 (09.09%)

29 (43.29%)

 

 

30 (90.91%)

38 (56.72%)

 

 

33

67

 

 

<0.05

 

Total

32 (32.0%)

68 (68.0%)

100 (100%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Major reasons for patient delay for >2 weeks as reported by patients

Reasons for delay

No. of cases

%age

Assuming symptoms will disappear by itself

94

94.0

Financial constraints

23

23.0

Health facility too far

11

11.0

Work overload

56

56.0

Absence of transportation

03

03

Following traditional treatment

67

67.0

Afraid of long processes in health facilities

43

43.0

 

Table 7: Average number of days of delays among Study Subjects

 Type of Delay

No. of Days of Delay

Mean (SD)

Median

Range

Patient Delay

44 (16.02)

45

20-90

Health System Delay

23 (10.7)

30

0-45

Total Delay

67 (16.88)

45

20-135

 


DISCUSSION

The morbidity and mortality associated with TB disease can be greatly minimized with the early detection of the disease and timely institution of the anti-tubercular treatment (ATT). The duration of infectiousness of an incident infectious case is of crucial importance with regard to the risk of the general population becoming exposed to such a case. If these cases were not detected and placed on adequate chemotherapy, a large proportion would remain who would still be susceptible to new infection.2 The Global Plan to Stop TB addresses the new challenges of the intersecting epidemics of TB and HIV, and it aims to cut the transmission chain by achieving early and effective treatment of all people with TB infection. 3 The Directly Observed Treatment Short-course (DOTS) strategy, recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the prevention and control of TB, relies on passive case finding by sputum smear microscopy.4 A smear positive pulmonary TB case infects 10-12 normal individuals per year, thus delay in diagnosis of TB fosters spread of infection. The total delay comprises of components of patient delay and a median component of health system delay. The patient delay comprises of the interval between onset of symptoms and seeking health care whereas the health system delay comprises of median number of days between first contact with the health care provider and being put on treatment. In our study cough was the predominant symptom present in 94.0% cases. Fever and loss of appetite was also present in 80.0% and 78.0% cases respectively. The first consultation of 64.0% tuberculosis patients was with the private practitioners. The rest (36.0%) visited government health centre. No patient was presented to traditional healer. These findings were in accordance with findings from many other studies in India and abroad.5,6,7 The factors influencing study subjects to first contact government or private health facilities were as follows:

  • As the age increased, proportion of subjects consulting private facilities was more, but not statistically significant (‘p’ value >0.05)
  • Females have preferred private facilities (67.74%) over government facilities when compared with males (57.89%), but not statistically significant (‘p’ value >0.05).
  • Higher the educational status, higher is the proportion of them going to private health facility (86.49% Vs 50.79%; p<0.05).
  • Single subjects approached private facilities more as compared to those who were married (87.50% vs. 59.52; p<0.05).
  • Patients with history of addiction to alcohol and smoking approached private facilities significantly more when compared with non-addicts (75.0% Vs 20.0%; p<0.05).

Out of total 100 patients who were asked the reasons why they reached the health centre late, 94 (94.0%) mentioned that they were assuming that symptoms will disappear by themselves in due course, out of which 70.21% had a longer patient delay. The association was not significant (‘p’ value > 0.05). The next most common reason mentioned was that the patients were following the traditional treatment with home remedies and over the counter drugs (67.0%), out of these 92.54% had a patient delay of more than 1 month. The association being significant (p <0.05). The other reasons being work overload (56.0%), afraid of long processes in health facilities (43.0%), financial constraints (23.0%), health facility too far (11.0%) and absence of transportation to report to the health facility (03.0%). More number of elderly patients (89.58%) had delay of >1 month in reporting to the first health facility (patient delay) as compared with the middle aged (53.33%) and young (31.82%). The association was found to be significant (‘p’ value <0.05). Also it was found that as the age increases the time taken for the start of treatment from diagnosis (health system delay) increases. Thus the health system delay of >15 days was seen in elderly (75.0%) and middle aged (73.33%) as compared to the younger ones (45.45%). The association was not significant (‘p’ value >0.05%). Bhushan B. et al found that the respiratory symptoms, such as cough and sputum production (p<0.05), are significantly less frequent among elderly patients and the longer median duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis seen in the elderly may be because the elderly tolerate symptoms for longer periods before seeking medical advice, or are neglected by the family.8 Our study showed a preponderance of females (62%) over the males (38%). More number of female patients (74.19%) had >1 month of patient delay than males (31.58%). This difference in gender was also seen in health system delay, females (77.42%) having more delay than males (52.63%). The association was significant (‘p’ value <0.05). It may probably due to some element of neglect towards females in some Indian families. The educational status showed a significant association for longer patient delay (p<0.05). 93.66% of illiterates had a delay of more than 1 month in seeking care. Illiterates were observed to have significant association with patient delay in studies done at Tamil Nad5 and New York.9 Unemployed patients (80.56%) showed significant association with patient delay (p<0.05). Generally heavy alcohol drinkers have neglect health behaviour, as an extension of this they do not seek timely medical help. This is reflected in our study, as the duration and proportion of delay was more among alcoholics. 84.0% of the present study population had health facility within 2 km of their residence. There was no significant association observed between distance >2 km to first health facility from subjects residence and patient delay. More proportion of patients had diagnosis delay if they had first contacted a private provider as compared to Govt. health provider. (patient delay of 82.81% Vs 41.67% and health system delay of 93.76% Vs 22.22%) which was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). First seeking a private practitioner was a clear risk factor for diagnostic delay in studies done in Ghana10, Nepal11, Nigeria12 Cough as a presenting symptom was significantly associated with a longer health system delay as compared to symptoms other than cough (71.28% Vs 16.67%; p<0.05). Being the prime symptom of respiratoty system it is invariably present in many lung conditions and thus can mislead treating physicians causing delay in diagnosis of TB. Patients were interviewed for the type of services obtained at the first presentation which showed 92.0% patients received non anti-tubercular drugs with only 36.0% being subjected for sputum microscopy. Also chest X-ray was advised to only 22.0%. The use of fluroquinolone antibiotics may mask the symptoms and cause a delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis. The patient delay comprising of the interval between onset of symptoms and seeking health care, varied from a minimum of 20 days to maximum of 90days with a median of 45 days and a mean (SD) of 44 (16.02) days of delay. Patient delay contributed more than provider delay to the total time to diagnosis in our context. The health system delay was in the range of 0-45 days, the mean (SD) being 23 (10.7) days. In multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors independently associated with patient delay were: age >60 years (p<0.05), female sex (p<0.05), illiteracy (p<0.05), unemployement (p<0.05), place of first presentation being private health facility (p<0.05), following traditional treatment with home remedies and over the counter drugs (p<0.05) and an unsatisfactory knowledge score about tuberculosis (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, the significant risk factors independently associated with health system delay were: female sex (p<0.05), place of first presentation being private health facility (p<0.05), and cough being the presenting symptom (p<0.05).

 

CONCLUSION

Thus from the present study it can be concluded that poor socio-economical status, illiteracy and stigma associated with the disease; resulting in a poor knowledge about the tuberculosis are the route causes for the delay in presentation to the health facility. Elderly patients (>60 years), female gender and unemployment are the significant risk factors for the patient delay. A high degree of tuberculosis among patients presenting with cough of 2 weeks duration and subjecting such patients for sputum microscopy should be a routine practice.

 

REFERENCES

  1. India TB Report 2018, RNTCP Annual Status Report, Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, page no. 9.
  2. World Health Organization. Diagnostic and treatment delay in tuberculosis. An in-depth analysis of the health-seeking behaviour of patients and health system response in seven countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. WHO-EM/TDR/009/E/10.06/1000. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. 2006.
  3. Moller, Valerie, Erstad, Ida, Cramm, Jane, Nieboer, Anna, Finkenflugel, Harry, Radloff, Sarah, Ndoro, Tinashe, Kwizera, Stella; Delays in presenting for tuberculosis treatment associated with fear of learning one is HIV-positive African Journal of AIDS Research, Volume 10, Number 1, April 2011, pp. 25-36(12).
  4. World Health Organization. WHO tuberculosis programme. Framework for effective tuberculosis control. WHO/TB/94. 179. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. 1994.
  5. Rajeshwari.R, Chandrashekar V, Suhadev M, Sivasubramaniam S, Sudha G., Renu G. Factors associated with patient and health system delays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in South India. Int J Tuberc lung Dis. 2002; 6(9):789-795.
  6. Ashoo Grover, Rajesh Kumar, Jindal SK. Treatment seeking behaviour of chest symptomatic. Ind J Tub. 2003; 50: 87-94.
  7. Selvam Jerard M, Wares F, Perumal M, Gopi PG, Sudha G, Chandrasekaran V, Santha T. Health-seeking behavior of new smear-positive TB patients under a DOTS programme in Tamil Nadu, India, 2003. Int J Tuberc lung Dis. 2007; 11(2): 161-167.
  8. Bhushan, B.; Kajal, N. C.; Maske, A.; Singh, S. P. Manifestations of tuberculosis in elderly versus young hospitalised patients in Amritsar, India. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Volume 16, Number 9, 1. September 2012, pp. 1210-1213(4).
  9. Sherman LF, Fujiwara PI, Cook SV, Bazerman LB, Frieden TR. Patient and health system delays in diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc lung Dis. 1999; 3(12): 1088-1095.
  10. Lawn SD, Afful B, Acheampong W. Pulmonary tuberculosis: diagnostic delay in Ghanian adults. Int J Tuberc lung Dis. 1998; 2(8): 635-640.
  11. Yamasaki – Nakagawa M, Ozasa. K, Yamada N, Osuga. K, Shimouchi A, Ishikawa et al. Gender difference in delays to diagnosis sand health care seeking behavior in a rural area of Nepal. Int J Tuberc lung Dis. 2001; 5(1): 24-31.
  12. Odusanya OO, Babafemi JO. Patterns of delays amongst pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Lagos. Nigeria. BMC public health. 2004 May; 4: 18.

 





 




 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.