Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 9 Issue 2 - February 2018


 

The prevalence of persistent QTC prolongation in type 2 diabetes mellites

 

Rupesh George1, Joseph T Antony2, David Jose3*, Anish Preshi4, Tom Francis5, Clint Vaz6

 

{1Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology} {2Senior Resident, 3Assistant Professor, 4,5Intern, 6Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine} Amala Institute of Medical Sciences Thrissur, Kerala, INDIA.

Email: rupeshgeorge@gmail.com chapps.antony@gmail.com medrdavid@gmail.com anishpreshy@gmail.com clintvaz.vaz@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Prolonged QTc interval in type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with significant cardiovascular mortality. The prevalence of QTc prolongation in type 2 Diabetes mellitus is 24%. Methods: Cross – sectional prospective study of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the inpatient and outpatient services of Amala institute of medical sciences. Repeat ECG is taken in patients with prolonged QTc and thus the prevalence of persistent QTc prolongation is calculated. Results: of the 289 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 114 patients (prevalence=39.4%) had QTc prolongation. Only 96 of those 114 patients had QTc prolongation 4 weeks later (prevalence=33.2%). Of the 289 patients 34.25% (n=99) had microvascular complications and 44.98% (n=130) had macrovascular complications. Conclusion: The prevalence of persistent QTc prolongation in type 2 diabetes mellitus from the study was 33.2%. 6.2% (n=18) individuals had prolonged QTc interval only in the first ECG. So, in diabetic patients conclude that there is QTc prolongation you need two different ECGs taken at 2 different occasions.

Key Word: QTC prolongation.

 

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The etiology of diabetes in India is due to number of factors including genetic factors coupled with obesity, rising living standards and lifestyle changes1. QT interval is the interval between the beginning of QRS complex to the ending of the T wave on surface ECG2. It represents the time taken from the onset of depolarization to the completion of repolarization of myocardium2. The interval has a great problem with its variation with age, sex, sympathetic tone, and diurnal pattern3. Its variation with the heart rate has resulted in the calculation of QTc. QTc intervals of 450ms and 460ms are considered as the upper limits in adult men and women respectively4. QT prolongation causes lowered ventricular fibrillation threshold5,6. This mainly occurs due to nonuniform recovery of the myocardial excitability7. A study conducted in patients with recent myocardial infarctions proved to be an indicator of sudden cardiac death8 The cardiovascular mortality is more in diabetes mellitus is higher than in normal population9. Coronary artery disease accounts for 65 to 80% of deaths in diabetic patients10. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a distinct entity which is independent of ischemic heart disease, systemic hypertension or other macrovascular complications11. This condition is characterized by damage of myocardium, disturbance of management of metabolic cardiovascular load, and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy12. There is both QT dispersion and QTc. QT dispersion is the mean difference between the QT maximum and QT minimum interval in all leads. Both QT dispersion and QTc have been demonstrated independently as markers of cardiovascular mortality. In a 5-year prospective study conducted on diabetic patients with QTc interval >460 ms cardiovascular mortality doubles.13. In this study we are trying to find out whether serial ECG recordings on 2 different occasions are necessary to brand that a patient has QTc prolongation.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross sectional study conducted in the department of General Medicine department in Amala Institute of Medical sciences, Thrissur, Kerala from January 2016 to June 2017, that evaluated 289 patients who were found to have type 2 Diabetes mellitus. Detailed history and clinical examination were done. QTc interval was calculated using the bazett’s formula. In those patients who had prolonged QTc, ECG was repeated. QTc was recalculated. Thus, the prevalence of persistent QTc prolongation were estimated. In the process systemic hypertension, dyslipidemia, microvascular complications and macrovascular complications and their association with persistently prolonged QTc prolongation were estimated. The associations were found using chi square test. The associations between duration of diabetes, treatment given and persistent QTc prolongation were estimated using fisher’s test.

 

RESULTS

The study was conducted to find out the prevalence of persistent prolongation of QTc interval in type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 289 people was involved in the study. The results were tabulated below. Table-1 shows the difference between number of patients with QTc prolongation on one occasion and comparing it with patients with persistent QTc prolongation. It shows that a total of 6.2% (18) had QTc prolongation only on one occasion.

Table 1:

QTc prolongation

Counts

Persistent QTc

prolongation

Counts

Yes

114(39.4%)

Yes

96(33.2%)

No

175(60.6%)

No

193(66.8%)

Grand Total

289(100%)

The study also found positive correlation between microvascular complications of type 2 DM and persistent QTc prolongation. There is no significant correlation between macrovascular complications of type 2 DM and persistent QTc prolongation. Table 2 shows the p value of the chi – square test of microvascular complication with persistent QTc prolongation. The study showed no significant correlation between macrovascular complication with persistent QTc prolongation.

Table 2:

Microvascular complication

P value (chi square test)

Diabetic neuropathy

0.002

Diabetic retinopathy

0.047

Diabetic nephropathy

0.000284

 

 

DISCUSSION

In the study conducted we found out the prevalence of persistent prolongation of QTc interval in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prevalence of persistent QTc prolongation has not been calculated before. According to Veglio et al the prevalence of QTc prolongation was 25.8%. Our study showed the prevalence of QTc prolongation to be 39.4%. But the prevalence of persistent QTc prolongation was 33.2%. In the study 31.8% were between 61-70 years of age of which males 31.5%(n=53) and females were 32.2%(n=39). Microvascular and macrovascular complications of patients in the study were compared with the persistent QTc prolongations. Microvascular complications compared were diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy. 34.25%(n=99) of the patients in the study had microvascular complications. Macrovascular complications compared were peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident. 44.98%(n=130) had macrovascular complications. In the study there was a significant number of patients who had QTc prolongation on only one occasion. So, it is necessary to take ECG on at least 2 occasions to confirm that the ECG of the patient has significantly prolonged QTc.

 

CONCLUSION

In our study we found that people with type 2 diabetes mellitus had significant prolongation of QTc interval. Also, we have found that there was a significant number who had QTc prolongation on the first occasion only. Thus, we have concluded that to confirm that a patient has QTc prolongation it is necessary to demonstrate QTc prolongation on two separate occasions

 

REFERENCES

  1. Kaveeshwar SA, Cornwall J. The current state of diabetes mellitus in India. Australas Med J. 2014;7(1):45.
  2. Moss AJ. The QT interval and torsade de pointes. Drug Saf. 1999;21(1):5–10.
  3. Isbister GK, Page CB. Drug induced QT prolongation: the measurement and assessment of the QT interval in clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(1):48–57.
  4. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(11):982–91.
  5. Schwartz PJ, Snebold NG, Brown AM. Effects of unilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation on the ventricular fibrillation threshold. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37(7):1034–40.
  6. Schwartz PJ, Stone HL. Effects of unilateral stellectomy upon cardiac performance during exercise in dogs. Circ Res. 1979;44(5):637–45.
  7. Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Kindwall KE, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME. Nonuniform recovery of excitability in the left ventricle. Circulation. 1988;78(6):1365–72.
  8. Algra A. Electrocardiographic risk factors for sudden death: a study with 245 cases of sudden death during a two-year follow-up after 24-hour electrocardiography in 6693 patients. 1990;
  9. Susan van D, Beulens JW, Yvonne T. van der S, Grobbee DE, Nealb B. The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(1_suppl): s3–8.
  10. Zoungas S, Patel A. Cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the impact of preventative therapies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1212(1):29–40.
  11. Voulgari C, Papadogiannis D, Tentolouris N. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: from the pathophysiology of the cardiac myocytes to current diagnosis and management strategies. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6: 883.
  12. Boudina S, Abel ED. Diabetic cardiomyopathy revisited. Circulation. 2007;115(25):3213–23.
  13. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Howard BV. Electrocardiographic repolarization complexity and abnormality predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(2):434–40.

 




 

 


 


 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.