Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Volume 9 Issue 3 - March 2019


 

Zink phosphide/Rattol poisoning at rural Konkan region

 

Kulkarni Ujwala Prabhakar1, Deshpande Janhavi Jaywant2*, Kotkunde Sunil3, Bamane Eknath4,

Nanawar Sagar5, Paranjpe Ameya6, Machunkar Abhijit7, V Nandankumar8, Kendre Pranam9,

Madkar Chaitanya10, Thakur Ravising11, Itkar Ramesh12

 

1,2Professor, 3,4,5,6Assistant Professor, 7,8SR, 9,10,11,12JR, Department of General Medicine, BKL Walawalkar Rural Medical College &Hospital, Dervan Kasarwadi, taluka Chiplun, Dist Ratnagiri Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: jspjvd@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Zinc phosphide is used as a rodenticide and is available as paste, bait pellets, granules, dust, and tracking powder formulations. In Kerala state zinc phosphide has second highest incidence for intoxicant poisoning after organophosphates. Aims and Objectives: To study Zink phosphide/Rattol poisoning at rural Kokan region. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the department of Medicine in the patients of Zinc phosphide poisoning during the one year period i.e. March 2017 to March 2018 in the one year 50 patients with Zinc phosphide poisoning admitted to the ward were selected for the study. All details of the patients like age, sex, Mode poisoning, Clinical features, Outcome etc. were noted. These findings were entered to excel sheet and analyzed by Excel software for windows 10. Result: In our study we have seen that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 30-40 was in 17[34.00%] followed by 20-30was in12[24.00%], 40-50 was in in 9[18.00%], 50-60 was in7[14.00%], >60 was in 5[10.00%]. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 64% and Female were 46%. The most common mode of poisoning was Suicidal i.e. 90% and Accidental was in 10%. The most common clinical features were Vomiting-90%, Abdominal pain in 80%, Drowsiness-70%, Breathlessness - 56%, Palpitation-24%, Icterus-18%. The majority of the patients were recovered i.e. 88% and Death occurred in 12% patients mostly associated with old age and higher doses of ingestion; 8% patients Referred to Higher centre for the various complications like hepatic failure, renal complications or GI bleeding. Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 30-40, the majority of the patients were Male. The most mode of poisoning was suicidal, The most common clinical features were Vomiting, Abdominal pain, Drowsiness-Breathlessness. The mortality was present in 12% patients.

Key Word: Zink phosphide, Rattol poisoning, Rat Poison.

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Zinc phosphide is used as a rodenticide and is available as paste, bait pellets, granules, dust, and tracking powder formulations. In Kerala state zinc phosphide has second highest incidence for intoxicant poisoning after organophosphates.1 Zinc phosphide is most effective fumigants and rodenticides widely used in many countries, especially in developing countries. Upon ingestion, phosphides come into contact with fluids in the gut and are converted to phosphine gas, which is then absorbed into the bloodstream. Phosphine is a highly toxic gas in humans and exerts its effects by many proposed mechanisms, including inhibition of cytochrome C oxidase and oxidative respiration.2,3 Phosphine mainly affects the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal (GI), hepatobiliary, and hematologic systems and causes electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities.2,3 The severe clinical symptoms in patients with phosphine poisoning include circulatory collapse, hypotension, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, and acute renal failure.2,4,5 No specific antidote has been identified; therefore, the main treatment is supportive care. Although some efforts have been made to establish more effective interventions and medications for management, the mortality rate remains high 6.

 

METHODOLOGY­

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the department of Medicine in the patients of Zinc phospide poisoning during the one year period i.e. March 2017 to March 2018 in the one year there were 50 patients with Zinc phospide poisoning were admitted to the ward were selected for the study. All details of the patients like age, sex, Mode poisoning, Clinical features, Outcome etc. were noted. These findings were entered to excel sheet and analyzed by Excel software for windows 10.

RESULT

Table 1: Distribution of the patients as per the Age

Age

No.

Percentage (%)

20-30

12

24.00

30-40

17

34.00

40-50

9

18.00

50-60

7

14.00

>60

5

10.00

Total

50

100.00

The majority of the patients were in the age group of 30-40 were 34.00% followed by 20-30 were 24.00%, 40-50 were 18.00%, 50-60 were 14.00%, >60 were 10.00%.

Graph 1: Distribution of the patients as per the Age

 

Table 2: Distribution of the patients as per the sex

Sex

No.

Percentage (%)

Male

32

64

Female

28

46

Total

50

100

The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 64% and Female were 46%

 

Table 3: Distribution of the patients as per the mode poisoning

Mode poisoning

No.

Percentage (%)

Suicidal

45

90%

Accidental

5

10%

Total

50

100%

The most common mode of poisoning was Suicidal i.e. 90% and Accidental was in 10%

Table 4: Distribution of the patients as per the Clinical features

Clinical feature

No. of patients

Percentage (%)

Vomiting

45

90%

Abdominal pain

40

80%

Drowsiness

35

70%

Breathlessness

28

56%

Palpitation

12

24%

Icterus

9

18%

 

Graph 2: Distribution of the patients as per the Clinical features

 

Table 5: Distribution of the patients as per the Outcome in the patients

Outcome

No.

Percentage (%)

Recovered

4

80

Death

6

12

Referred to Higher centre

4

8

Total

50

100

The majority of the patients were recovered i.e. 88% and Death occurred in 12% patients mostly associated with old age and higher doses of ingestion; 8% patients Referred to Higher centre for the various complications like hepatic failure, renal complications or GI bleeding.

 

DISCUSSION
Zinc Phosphide is an inorganic chemical that is used to control rats, mice, voles, ground squirrels, prairie dogs, nutria, muskrats, feral rabbits and gophers. It is also uses as a tracking powder for the control of house mice. It is used on crop areas and on non-crop areas including lawns, golf courses, highway medians, and areas adjacent to wetlands7,8. It may be formulated as a grain based bait, as scrap bait or as a paste. Rodenticide baits usually contain 2.0 percent of zinc phosphide. Zinc Phosphide is a Restricted Use Pesticide (RUP). RUPs may be purchased and used only by certified applicators.

Toxicological Effects/Acute Toxicity: Some formulations of this rodenticide are classified as highly toxic and require the signal word DANGER-POISON on the label. Others are either moderately toxic or only slightly toxic and thus require the signal words WARNING or CAUTION respectively. Zinc phosphide reacts with water and acid in the stomach and causes severe irritation12. Symptoms of acute zinc phosphide poisoning include nausea, shock, weak heart beat and low blood pressure, loss of consciousness13. Other symptoms include vomiting, diarrhea, cyanosis, rales, restlessness and fever. There are documented cases of adults dying from massive doses of the pesticide (4,000 to 5,000 mg) although others have survived acute exposure of as high as 25,000 mg to 100,000 mg of zinc phosphide if vomiting occurred early and absorption was limited 9,10. The LD50 for the technical product (80-90% pure) is 45.7 mg/kg while the LD50 values for lower concentration formulations are slightly higher (i.e. less toxic). In sheep the LD50 ranges from 60 to 70 mg/kg13. The inhalation of zinc phosphide or its breakdown product phosphine gas may result in acute toxicity13. No specific doses were mentioned in the reference. The compound is non-irritating to the skin and eyes12. In our study we have seen that The majority of the patients were in the age group of 30-40 were 34.00% followed by 20-30 were 24.00%, 40-50 were 18.00%, 50-60 were 14.00%, >60 were 10.00%. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 64% and Female were 46%. The most common mode of poisoning was Suicidal i.e. 90% and Accidental was in 10%. The most common clinical features were Vomiting-90%, Abdominal pain in 80%, Drowsiness-70%, Breathlessness-56%, Palpitation-24%, Icterus-18%. The majority of the patients were recovered i.e. 88% and Death occurred in 12% patients mostly associated with old age and higher doses of ingestion; 8% patients Referred to Higher centre for the various complications like hepatic failure, renal complications or GI bleeding. These findings are similar to Satariya Trakulsrichai et al they found the mean age was 39.91±19.15 years. The most common route of exposure was oral (99.3%). Most patients showed normal vital signs, oxygen saturation, and consciousness at the first presentation. The three most common clinical presentations were gastrointestinal (GI; 68.8%), cardiovascular (22.0%), and respiratory (13.8%) signs and symptoms Patients who survived and died showed significant differences in age, duration from taking zinc phosphide to hospital presentation.

 

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded from our study that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 30-40, the majority of the patients were Male. The most mode of poisoning was suicidal, The most common clinical features were Vomiting, Abdominal pain, Drowsiness-Breathlessness. The mortality was present in 12% patients.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Pillay VV, Arathy SL, Vijesh KP, Vipin KG. Five year survey of toxicological testing of clinical body fluid samples at the poison control centre in the indian state of kerala. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(01):52-5.
  2. Proudfoot AT. Aluminium and zinc phosphide poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009;47(2):89–100
  3. Bumbrah GS, Krishan K, Kanchan T, Sharma M, Sodhi GS. Phosphide poisoning: a review of literature. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;214(1–3):1–6.
  4.  Chugh SN, Aggarwal HK, Mahajan SK. Zinc phosphide intoxication symptoms: analysis of 20 cases. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;36(7): 406–407.
  5. Dogan E, Guzel A, Ciftci T, et al. Zinc phosphide poisoning. Case Rep Crit Care. 2014; 2014: 589712.
  6. Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Shahnazi M, Zamani N, Rahimi M, Bahrami-Motlagh H, Amiri H. Plain abdominal radiography: a powerful tool to prognosticate outcome in patients with zinc phosphide poisoning. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(10):1062–1065.
  7. Briggs, S.A. 1992. Basic Guide to Pesticides: Their Characteristics and Hazards. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., WA
  8. Johnson, G.D. and K.A. Fagerstone. 1992. Primary and Secondary Hazards of Zinc Phosphide to Nontarget Wildlife: A Review of the Literature. Denver Wildlife Research Center, USDA/APHIS, Denver, CO.
  9. Clarkson, T.W. 1991. Inorganic and Organometal Pesticides. In Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, Volume 2, Classes of Pesticides. W.J. Hayes and E.R. Laws (eds.). Academic Press, NY
  10. Ecobichon, D.J. 1991. Toxic Effects of Pesticides. In Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Pesticides, Fourth Edition. M.O. Amdur, J. Doull and C.D. Klassen (eds.). Pergamon Press, NY.
  11. The Agrochemicals Handbook. 1991. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Cambridge, England.
  12. Worthing, C.R. (ed.). 1991. The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium. The British Crop Protection Council.
  13. TOXNET. 1992. Hazardous Substance Database. Zinc Phosphide. National Library of Medicine. Hazardous Substance Data Base.