v
Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 4 Issue 3- December 2016


Clinico - mycological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in central India

 

Shaikh Waseemuddin Nayeemuddin1*, Jayesh Ishwardas Mukhi2, Kinjal Deepak Rambhia3, Rajesh Pratap Singh4

 

1Resident Doctor, 2Associate Professor, 3Assistant Professor, 4Professor and HOD, Department of Dermatology-Venereology-Leprosy, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra-440003., INDIA.

Email: waseemgmc8854@gmail.com, jayesh.mukhi@gmail.com, kinjal_rambhia@hotmail.com, rpsingh13m@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Dermatophytoses are superficial fungal infection of skin, hairs and nails. It constitutes one of the major burden of dermatology clinic. Nowadays there is an upsurge in the incidence and treatment resistance has been increasing. Aim: To study the clinicoetiological profile of dermatophytic infections. Setting: Hospital based observational study Material and Methods: One hundred and ten clinically diagnosed cases of dermatophytoses were included. After taking detailed history and complete cutaneous examinations, 10 % KOH for skin and hairs, while 40% KOH for nail samples was done along with culture on Sabourads dextrose agar slant, containing 0.05% chloramphenicol and 0.5% cycloheximide. Results: Males are more affected than females with male : female ratio of 1.34. Most common age group affected in 20-40 yrs (47.27%). Out of 110 samples, 62 (56.36%) were KOH positive, while 48 (43.63%) were culture positive. Trichophyton mentagrophytes was the predominant species isolated, followed by Trichophyton rubrum. Also Trichophyton terrestre was isolated in 2 samples. Conclusions: There is changing etiological spectrum of dermatophytosis in central india.

Key Words: Central India, Dermatophytosis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton

terrestre

 

INTRODUCTION

Dermatophytes (literal meaning skin plant) are causative agents of superficial fungal infections of the keratinized tissues namely skin, hair, and nails. Dermatophytes represent more than 40 closely related species of three genera Trichophyton, Epidermophyton and Microsporum, classified by habitat and host preferences into three classes - anthropophilic, geophilic and zoophillic. Dermatophytoses are one of the most common dermatological problems especially in developing countries like India. The etiological spectrum varies according to time and place, which may be attributed to changes in climatic and socioeconomic conditions. Recently there has been a surge in the incidence in the dermatophytosis. The reasons which could contribute to this increase might be the change in the etiological agent, with antifungal resistance also as a major factor. Surveillance is crucial for defining the burden of infection and changing trend; for evaluating the proper intervention. There are few studies in central India on dermatophytoses. Hence the present study was undertaken to study the clinicoepidemiological profile and etiological spectrum of dermatophytoses in a tertiary care centre; and to correlate the clinical diagnosis with potassium hydroxide smear and culture positivity.

 

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

110 clinically diagnosed patients of dermatophytosis attending our outpatient department were included in this study after obtaining written informed consent. The patients were randomly selected for the study. Ethical clearance was obtained before the start of study from the institutional ethical committee. Patients of all age group above one year were included in the study. Patients who were not willing for consent, pregnant females, patient on systemic antifungal treatment within last 1 month, applying steroids and indigenous topical preparations were excluded from the study. Detailed history and clinical examination were performed in each case. Routine investigations were done in all cases. Based on the site of infection scales, nail scrapping or hair were collected by the standard set of procedures. Specimens were subjected to potassium hydroxide – 10% for skin and hair samples; while 40% for nail sample, for a demonstration of fungal elements. Irrespective of KOH findings, all specimens were subjected to culture on Sabourads dextrose agar slant, containing 0.05% chloramphenicol and 0.5% cycloheximide to eliminate bacterial and nondermotophtyic molds contamination. Culture tubes were incubated at 28°c for up to four weeks to label it as negative. Individual fungal isolates were identified based on macroscopic examination of the colony - morphology, pigmentation, growth rate, slide culture and lactophenol cotton blue mount. Special tests like hair perforation and urease test were done wherever required. Non dermatophytic moulds on culture were excluded and considered negative.

 

RESULTS

Out of 110 patients, 63 (57.27%) were males; while 47 (42.72%) were females with male female ratio of 1.34. Among various clinical presentations of dermatophytes, tinea corporis was most common in 31 (28.18%), followed by mixed pattern in 23 (20.90%) of patients. Most common age group affected was 20-40 yrs with 52 (47.27%) cases. Students were most common group affected, i.e 31 (28.18%). Family history / Contact history was given by 32 (29.09%) of cases. Among 110 samples given for KOH and culture, 62 (56.36%) were KOH positive, while 48 (43.63%) were positive on culture considering only dermatophytes. 8 samples were positive on culture but negative on KOH mount. Trichophyton mentagrophytes was most common isolate in 19 (40.42%) out of 48 culture positive samples, followed by Trichophyton rubrum in 11 (26.19%). Other dermatophytes grown on culture were T.Verrucosum, T.Tonsurans, T.Violaceum, E.Floccusum, Trichophyton terrestre, Microsporum ferrugineum, Trichophyton sondanse, Trichophyton Schoenleinii.

Table 1

Sr no

Age group (yrs)

Total no

Male

Female

01

1-10

09 (8.18%)

05

04

02

11-20

17(15.45)

11

06

03

21-40

52 (47.27%)

28

23

04

41-60

20 (18.18%)

10

10

05

>60

13 (11.81%)

09

04

TOTAL

110

63 (57.27%)

47 (42.72%)

 

Table 2

Clinical type

No of cases

Male

Female

T.Corporis

31 (28.18%)

19

12

T.Cruris

21 (19.09%)

13

8

Onychomycosis

12 (10.90%)

5

7

T.Facei

8 (7.27%)

5

3

T.Capitis

7 (6.36%)

4

3

T.mannum/pedis

8 (7.27%)

5

3

Mixed pattern

23 (20.90%)

12

10

Total

110

63

47

 

Table 3

Profession

Male

Female

Total

Students

21

10

31 ( 28.18%)

Emplyoees

(unskilled workers)

15

7

22 (20%)

Housewives

-

15

15 (13.63%)

Farmers

10

5

15 (13.63%)

Laborers

7

5

12 (10.90%)

Teachers

3

2

5 (4.54%)

Skilled professionals

3

1

4 (3.63%)

Others

4

2

6 (5.45%)

Total

63

47

110

 

Table 4

Koh Mount

Culture

Total

Positive

Negative

Positive

40

22

62 (56.36%)

Negative

08

40 (36.36%)

48

Total

48 (43.63%)

62

110

 

Table 5

Clinical type

No of cases

KOH positive

Culture positive

T.Corporis

31

19

16

T.Cruris

21

11

9

Onychomycosis

12

6

3

T.Facei

8

4

4

T.Capitis

7

2

2

T.mannum/pedis

8

4

3

Mixed pattern

23

16

11

Total

110

62

48

 

 


 

 

Table 6

Species

No of positive cases

T.Mentagrophytes

19 (40.42%)

T.Rubrum

11 (26.19%)

T.Verrucosum

5 (11.90%)

T.Tonsurans

3 (7.14%)

T.Violaceum

3 (7.14%)

E.Floccusum

2 (4.76%)

Others

5 (11.90%)

Total

48


 

Table 7

T.Mentagrophytes

T.Rubrum

T.Verrucosum

T.Tonsurans

T.Violaceum

E.Floccusum

Others

Total

T.Corporis

7

3

1

1

1

0

2

16

T.Cruris

4

3

1

0

0

1

0

9

T.Capitis

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

T.Facei

2

1

0

0

1

0

1

4

T.Mannum/Pedis

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

3

Onychomycosis

0

2

0

0

0

1

0

3

Mixed pattern

5

2

1

1

2

0

0

11

Total

19

11

5

3

3

2

5

48

Others: Trichophyton terrestre, Microsporum ferrugineum, Trichophyton sondanse, Trichophyton Schoenleinii

 

Figure 1:                                            Figure 2:                                                           Figure 3:                                            Figure 4:

Figure 5:                                            Figure 6:                                                      Figure 7:                                      Figure 8:

 

Figure 9:                                            Figure 10:                          Figure 11:                                         Figure 12:

 

Figure 13:

Figure 1: T.mentagrophytes ; Thallus color: white to sandy to butter yellow; Figure 2: T.mentagrophytes; Reverse: white to tan, rarely reddish brown; Figure 3: T.mentagrophytes; Round microconidia in grape-like clusters, spiral hyphae, +/- cigar shaped, thin walled macroconidia, narrowly attached to hyphae; Figure 4: T.rubrum; Thallus color: white to pale pink; Figure 5: T.rubrum; Reverse: blood red to reddish brown; Figure 6: T.rubrum; Few pyriform, lateral microconidia pencil shaped , macroconidia uncommon,‘birds on wire’  appearance; Figure 7: T.Violaceum; Thallus color: purplish red with white sectors; Figure 8: T.Violaceum; Reverse: lavender to purple; Figure 9: T.Verrucosum; Thallus color: white, grey or yellow; Figure 10: T.Verrucosum; Reverse: colorless; Figure 11: T.terrestre; Thallus color: white to yellow; Figure 12: T.terrestre; Reverse: yellow, occasionally red; Figure 13: T.terrestre; Microconidia pyriform to elongate, often on pedicels

 


DISCUSSION

Present study is carried in central India, where climate is hot and humid, thereby facilitating growth of fungus. Males are more affected than females with male female ratio of 1.34, a finding that is well correlated with previous studies done by Noronha et al.1, Amin et al.2 and Singh et al.3 The reason for less incidence in females might be due to social restrictions, personal inhibitions preventing them for reporting. The most common age group is 20-40 yrs of age. This finding is in collaboration with studies by Chaudhary et al.4, Aggrawal et al.5 and Grover et al 6. Both of these facts can be explained by outdoor physical activity increasing the exposure. The most common clinical presentation is Tinea corporis followed by mixed pattern. This can be partly attributed by fact that people are not reporting early so many present mixed pattern at presentation. This is in accordance with the studies done by Surekha et al7., Nagabhusanam et al.8 and Patwardhan et al.9 and few other studies.10-13  We got 20.3% of mixed infection, a finding correlated with Siddappa et al.(23%)14, which can be explained by delay in reporting. Also we found that Tinea capitis affected only children less than 10 yrs of age, a similar finding reported by Grover et al. 14, more common in males than female. This can be explained by increased fungistatic triglyceride content of sebum in adults.15 Short hairs in male facilitates the growth of fungus, while regular use of vegetable oil is associated with low incidence of Tinea capitis in females.16 Most common group affected were students. Unskilled workers were more affected than skilled workers. Both the facts can be attributed by fact that they are more exposed to outdoor environment. Family history was given by 32 (28.18 %). Bindu et al17 reported family history in 30 cases - 20%. In our study KOH positivity was seen in 62 (56.63%), while culture positivity 48 (43.63%). 22 (20%) samples were KOH positive, culture negative. 8 samples were KOH negative, culture positive which can be due to error in reporting the KOH mount or insufficient sample. 40 samples (36.36%) were both KOH and culture negative. Comparable findings were reported by Noronha et al.1, Chaudhary et al.4, Bindu et al.17, Kumaran et al.18 hence we can assume that both KOH mount and culture should be done to prevent false negative reporting. Trichophyton mentagrophytes was the most common species isolated on culture (40.42%), followed by T.rubrum. Similar findings have been reported by Noronha et al1, Kumaran et al.18 Agrawal et al.19 kumaran et al.18 It was undoutedtly proven that T.rubrum was most common causative organism for dermatophytosis.3,4,7-9,11,12,20,21 But recently there has been change in etiological spectrum with most common cause T.mentagrophytes, a zoophillic from an anthropophillic species, T.rubrum. However Grover et al.6 had reported T. tonsurans (20.5%) as the commonest isolate. It could be explained on the basis of different climatic conditions and geographic distribution. In our study, geophillic species, T.terrestre was isolated in 2 cases. After reviewing the literatrure, we found that there has been only one case report of T.terrestre in india.22 It has been stated that lesions of zoophillic and geophillic species are more inflammatory than those of anthrophillic infection. We can assume that there has been change in morphology of dermatophytes to more inflammatory type of lesions.23 Also there has been studies regarding antifungal succepptibility of both of these species, indicating lower efficacy of fluconazole, while higher with griseofulvin and ketoconazole of T.mentagrophytes as compared to T.rubrum.24,25,26

 

CONCLUSION

There is changing pattern of etiological spectrum of dermatophytosis. There might be change in the clinical presentation. Also there might be change in antuifungal sensitivity. Both of these facts are to further justified by more large scale studies.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Noronha TM, Topakhane RS, Nadiger S.Clinico-microbiological study of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in north Karnataka. Indian Dermatol Online J 2016; 7:264-71.
  2. Amin AG, Shah HS. Dermatophytosis. Indian J Dermatol 1973; 19:22‑7.
  3. Singh S, Beena PM. Profile of dermatophyte infections in Baroda. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003; 69:281‑3.
  4. Chaudhary J K, Kumar A. A Clinico - Mycological Profile of Dermatophytosis at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2016) 5(2): 181-189
  5. Aggarwal A, Arora U, Khanna S. Clinical and Mycological Study of Superficial Mycoses in Amritsar. Indian J dermatology 2002; 47:4: 218 – 20.
  6. Grover WCS, Roy CP. Clinico–mycological Profile of Superficial Mycosis in a Hospital in North East India. Medical, Journal Armed Forces India 2003; 59:2:114- 6.
  7. Surekha A, Ramesh Kumar G, Sridevi K, Murty DS, Usha G, Bharathi G. Superficial dermatomycoses: a prospective clinicomycological study. J Clin Sci Res 2015; 4:7-15.
  8. Nagabhushanam P, Tirumalarao D, Patnaik R. Dermatomycoses in Hyderabad area. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1969; 35:120-3.
  9. Patwardhan N, Dave R. Dermatomycosis in and around Aurangabad. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1999; 42:455-62.
  10. Belurkar DD, Barmi RN, Karthikeyan S, Vadhavkar RS. A mycological study of dermatophytosis in Thane. Bombay Hosp J 2004; 46:2.
  11. Sumana V, Singaracharya MA. Dermatophytosis in Khammam (Khammam district, Andhra Pradesh, India). Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2004; 47:287-9.
  12. Patel P, Mulla S, Patel D, Shrimali G. A study of superficial mycosis in south Gujarat region. Natl J Commun Med 2010; 1:85-8.
  13. Das K, Basak S, Ray S. A study on superficial fungal infection from West Bengal: A Brief Report. J Life Sci 2009; 1:51-5.
  14. Grover C, Arora P, Manchanda V. Tinea capitis in Paediatric population: A study from north India. Indian Journal of Dermatol, Venereol Leprol 2010; 76:527
  15. Siddappa K, Mahipal OA. Dermatophytoses in Davangere. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1982; 48:254‑9.
  16. Rippon J M. Dermatophytosis and Dermatomycosis, In Chapter 8. Medical Mycology: The Pathogenic Fungi and Pathogenic Actinomycetes. 3rd Edition. W. B Saunders Company, Philadelphia; 1988: 169-275.
  17. Dasgupta L R, Sharma K B, Fernandez D. Superficial mycosis in Pondicherry. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol 1973; 19: 41-46.
  18. Bindu V, Pavithran K. Clinico-mycological study of dermatophytosis in Calicut. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002; 68:259-61.
  19. G.Kumaran, M Jeya. clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytic infections. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2014 April;5(2):(B) 1-5.
  20. Agarwal US, Saran J, Agarwal P. Clinico‑mycological study of dermatophytes in a tertiary care centre in northwest India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2014; 80:194.
  21. Surendran K, Bhat RM, Boloor R, Nandakishore B, Sukumar D. A clinical and mycological study of dermatophytic infections. Indian J Dermatol 2014; 59:262-7.
  22. Pavani A, Singh M, Basireddy S, et al. Dermatophytosis in and around Mahabubnagar. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5(32):1739-1743
  23. Kumar S, Bhadauria S. Clinico-mycological profiles of dermatophytosis in Jaipur, India. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res 2016; 10(35):1477-82.
  24. Radentz WH. Fungal skin infections associated with animal contact. Am Fam Physician. 1991 Apr; 43(4):1253-6.
  25. Sowmya N, Appalaraju. B, Srinivas CR, Surendran P. JMR 2015; 1(2): 64-67.
  26. Indira G. In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of 5 Antifungal Agents against Dermatophytic Species by CLSI (M38-A) Micro Dilution Method. Clin Microbial 2014; 3:145.
  27. Jessup CJ, Warner J, Isham N, Hasan I, Ghannoum MA. Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: establishing a medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jan; 38(1):341-4.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.