Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 6 Issue 1 - April 2017


 

Study of clinical and haematological profile of dengue fever in a tertiary care hospital

 

D P Bhurke1, Nihal Ahmed KhanIqbal Ahmed Khan2, Mohammed Ubaidulla Mohammed Ataulla3*

 

1Professor and HOD, 2PG Student, 3Associate Professor, Department of Medicine Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: khannihal697@gmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Dengue fever (DF) is an acute febrile infectious disease in subtropical and tropical areas which is one of the world’s major emerging infectious disease. Over half of the world’s population lives in areas at risk of infection. The etiologic agents include all four serotypes which belong to the genus flavivirus in the family flaviviridae. The principal vector is the mosquito, aedesaegypti, which breeds largely indoors in Artificial waters containers, and feeds on humans in daytimes. The clinical manifestations of dengue vary and can be classified into five presentations. Objectives: To study the clinical manifestations and some laboratory parameters and various complications and outcome in the patients of dengue fever. Methodology: In this prospective study, 100 cases with dengue infection who were admitted from June 2015 to June 2017 at a tertiary care hospital were studied. The patients were labelled as belonging to either of the following categories: Classical Dengue Fever (DF) or Dengue Haemorrhagic fever (DHF) or Dengue shock syndrome (DSS) Results: Highest number of cases were from 12-20 years (33%).The majority of cases (81%) had DF, 19% had DHF, while no patient of DSS. Fever was the most common symptom followed by Headache. Haemoconcentration was found in only 4 patients with DHF. Liver enzymes were elevated in 10 patients of DF and in 8 patients with DHF while deranged RFT were found in 21% patients with DHF and 2.46% patients of DF. Coagulation profile was deranged in 5 patients (26.31%) in DHF and in none in DF. Pleural effusion was found in 10 patients (52.6%) and ascites was found in 11 patients (58%) of DHF. Hepatomegaly was present in 18 patients (22%) of DF and 8 patients (42%) of DHF. Conclusions: Typical biphasic pattern of fever was seen in only a small number of patients. The most common haemorrhagic manifestations were haematemesis and malaena. A positive tourniquet test was found only in a small number of patients. Thrombocytopenia is an important haematological finding, both in DF and DHF patients. Leukopenia is found in majority of the patients with DF and DHF.

Key Words: dengue fever.

 

INTRODUCTION

Dengue fever (DF) is an acute febrile infectious disease in subtropical and tropical areas which progressively making its way from being “one of the great neglected disease of mankind”1 toward being acknowledged as one of the world’s major emerging infectious disease”2. In 1998, a total of 5,58,000 infections and 15,000 deaths due to DF were reported by member States of the world health organization (W.H.O.) which corresponds to the case –fatality rate of 2.7% annually, there are estimated 50-100 million cases of DF and 250,000 to 500,000 cases of dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) in the world. Over half of the world’s population lives in areas at risk of infection3, 4. The etiologic agents include all four serotypes which belong to the genus flavivirus in the family flaviviridae. The principal vector is the mosquito, aedesaegypti, which breeds largly indoors in Artificial waters containers, and feeds on humans in daytimes5. The clinical manifestations of dengue vary with the age of the patient and in addition to clinically inapparentinfection, can be classified into five presentation:

  1. Non-Specific Febrile Illness,
  2. Classic Dengue Fever [DF],
  3. Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF),
  4. Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS) and
  5. Other unusual syndromes such encephalopathy and fulminant liver failure.(8,9)

The present study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in a district, to study the clinical manifestation, complications and outcome of patients with dengue infection. All cases of dengue fever admitted in General Medical Ward and Medical intensive care unit (MICU) were included in the study.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 102 cases with dengue infection who were admitted in General Medical Ward (G.M.W.) and Medical Intensive care unit (M.I.C.U.) at a tertiary care hospital were studied.

The duration of the study was from June 2015 to June 2017.

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Patients presenting with acute onset febrile illness with 2 or more of the manifestations like Headache, Reto-Orbital pain, Myalgia, Arthralgia, Rash, Haemorrhagic manifestation, Leukopenia and
  2. Supportive serology i.e a positive IgM antibody test by ELISA on a late acute or convalescent phase serum.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. All patients aged less than 12 years.
  2. Cases with malarial parasite seen in peripheral smear were excluded.
  3. Cases with evidence of salmonella infection on blood culture or evidence of leptospirosis by tridot test.
  4. Patients having fever of more than 2 weeks duration.

The patients were labelled as belonging to either of the following categories:

Classical Dengue Fever (DF) or Dengue Haemorrhagic fever (DHF) or Dengue shock syndrome (DSS)

 

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

During the Present Study carried out at a tertiary care hospital in a rural area of a district, from Jan 2016 to Nov 2017. 100 patients with Dengue Fever admitted in G.M.W. and M.I.C.U. were studied and the following observations were made.

 

Table 1: Age wise distrubtion of cases

Age Wise (Years)

Number (No.) of cases

Percentage

12-20

33

33

21-30

28

28

31-40

24

24

41-50

09

9

51-60

04

4

>60

02

2

Total

100

100

 

Table 2: Gender wise distribution of cases

Gender

No. of cases

Percentage

Male

71

71

Female

29

29

 

Table 3: Distribution of cases with dengue infection

 

DF

DHF

DSS

Total

N

81

19

Nil

100

%

81

19

0.00

100

 

Table 4: Age wise distribution of DF and DHF cases

Age group (Years)

DF

DHF

Total (n)

Percentage (%)

12-20

23

10

33

33

21-30

24

04

28

28

31-40

21

03

24

24

41-50

08

01

09

9

51-60

04

00

04

4

61-70

01

01

02

2

Total

81

19

100

100

 

Table 5: The gender – Wise distribution of cases With DF and DHF table

 

DF

DHF

Total

 

N

%

n

%

n

%

Male

56

69.13

15

78.94

71

71

Female

25

30.86

4

21.05

29

29

Total

81

100

19

100

100

100

 

Table 6: Symptom- wise distribution of cases

Cilincal manifestations

No of DF+ DHF cases n = 100

Percentage (%)

Fever

100

100

Headache

62

62

Retro-orbital pain

20

20

Arthralgia/myalgia

40

40

Body ache

66

66

Anorexia

25

25

Nausea or Vomiting

41

41

Diarrhea

15

15

Abdominal pain

30

30

Respiratory symptoms

15

15

Haemorrhagic Manifestation

25

25

Rash

20

20

Sore throat

5

5

Conjunctival congestion

15

15

Hepatomegaly

25

25

Splenomegaly

23

23

Lymphadenopathy

0

0

Table 7: Various haemorrhagic manifestations see in the present study

Haemorrhagic

No cases

Percentage

Petechiae

14

14

Purpuric spots

2

2

Ecchymoses

2

2

Epistaxis

6

6

Gingival bleeding

2

2

Hematemesis and/or melena

19

19

Haematuria

2

2

Haemoptysis

2

2

Menorrhagia/bleeding per vagina

4

4

Positive tourniquet test

7

7

 

 

Table 8: Temperature in the study subjects

Median duration of fever (range)

6 days (3-10days)

Median maximum body temperature(range)

39 c (38.2-40.2c)

Type of fever

Biphasic n (%)

18(18%)

 

Continuous n (%)

82(82%)

 

Table 9: Mean haemoglobin level and platelet count

 

DF(n=81)

Dhf (n=19)

Mean hb level

11gm%

10.4gm%

Mean platelet count admission

47,000/cm3

38,000/mm3

Mean platelet count discharge

150.000/mm3

1,10,000mm3

 

Table 10: Haemotologicaland biochemical parameters

Haemotologicaland biochemical parameters

DF (n=81)

%

DHF (n=19)

%

Leukopenia(<4.3x10/l)

60

74.07

9

47.36

Haemoconcentration (<52%M,>48%F)

Nil

Nil

4

21.05

Serum albumin <3.5 gm%)

Nil

Nil

10

52.63

Raised AST (>5U/L)

10

12.34

8

42.10

Raised ALT (>35U/L)

10

12.34

8

42.10

Raised BUN (>20mg/dl)

2

2.46

8

42.10

Raised serum creatine (>1.5mg/dl)

2

2.46

4

21.05

PT (Control+1sec)

Nil

Nil

5

26.31

APTT (Comparable to control )

Nil

Nil

5

26.31

Urine routine for rbcs

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 11: Ultrasonographic findings in the study subjects

 

DF (n=81)

%

DHF (n-19)

%

Pleural effusion

5

6.17

10

52.63

Ascites

15

18.51

11

57.89

Hepatomegaly

18

22.22

08

42.10

Splenomegaly

20

24.69

12

63.15

 

In the present study the highest cases were from the age group between 12-20 years summing upto 33%, while the least were in the age group of >60 years (2%). The majority of cases (71) which were about two-thirds were males and rest were females. Out total 100 patients studied, 81(81%) had DF, 19 (19%) had DHF, while no patient of DSS. It was seen that out of the total 81 patients with DF, 56(69%) were male and 25 (30%) were female, while out of total 19 patients with DHF, 15(78.9%) were male and rest were female. Fever was the most common symptom followed by Headache, while a significant number of patient reported retro- orbital pain, arthralgia, myalgia body ache, anorexia, nausea, vomiting. The median duration of fever was 6days (range 3-10days) with Median maximum body temperature of 39.0c (range 38.5-40.6c). Only 18 patients (18%) had a biphasic course with a nadir between 2 temperature peaks. The remaining 82 patients had a continuous temperature. It was observed that leucopenia was present in a significant number of patients with DF and DHF. Haemo concentration was found in only 4 patients (21.05%) with DHF. Liver enzymes were elevated in 10 patients (12.34%) with DF and in 8 Patients (42.10%) with DHF while deranged renal function tests were found in 4 patients (21.05%)with DHF and two patient (2.46%) with DF. Coagulation profile was deranged in 5 patients (26.31%) with DHF and in none of the patients with DF. Microscopic examination of urine samples did not show any evidence of haematuria in any of the patients in the study. Pleural effusion was found in 10 patients (52.6%) and ascites was found in 11 patients (58%) of DHF. Hepatomegaly was present in 18 patients (22%) of DF and 8 patients (42%) of DHF.

 

DISCUSSION

Gopal K et al.6 (2017) in their cross-sectional observational study undertaken among adult patients admitted in a teaching hospital, reported that most of the patients i.e. 42.86% were between 21-30 years of age. According to Stephan c et al9 (2002)102, the maximum incidence of dengue fever among adult population was in the age group of 21-30 years.  From the studies by Gopal K et al.6 (2017), Khan YM. et. al11(2016), Meena R et al14 (2016) including the present study, it appears that among population >12 years of age, dengue infection is most common between 12-30 years, with a maximum incidence in the age group of 12-20 years. The male to female ratio in the present study is 2.44 : 1 which correlates well with the findings of Deshwal R. et al10 (2015). Although DHF, is said be primarily a disease of children under the age of 15 years, the relatively high incidence of DHF Patients in the present study may be due to more severe patients being referred to this hospital for tertiary care. Also, most of the patients with DHF in the present study were in the age- group of 12-20 years. Kale AV et al7 (2007) in his study of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Dengue Fever from a Tertiary Care Centre at Aurangabad Maharashtra India: An Observational Study showed that 128 (85.33%) cases were Dengue fever with warning signs, 15 (10%) were Severe dengue and 7 (4.67%) were Dengue fever without warning signs which was quite close to the present study. Also Madhavi K et al (2016) did a study of clinical and haematological profile of dengue fever in a tertiary care hospital at Kakinada in which showed resonating results to the present study as72% patients had Dengue fever, 23% patients had DHF and 5% had DSS. Thus fever is the most common presentation in dengue infection as shown by the studies of Gopal K et al.6 and Khan YM. et. Al11, Deshwal R. et al10as in the present study. The second most common symptom in the present study was headache (62%) which correlates well with the findings of Khan YM. et. Al11.The other major clinical manifestation in the present study were retro – orbital pain (20%), arthrialgia and/or myalgia (40%) and bodyache (66%), which is also confirmed by study of Khan YM. et. Al11 (2016).About 25% patients in the present study complained of anorexia, and 15 percent of patients had diarrhea. Abdominal pain, which was mainly in the epigastric region, was seen in 30% patients, which is also seen in the studies of Gopal K et al.6 (2017), Khan YM. et.al11 (2016). A total of 25 patients (i.e. 25%) had haemorrhagic manifestation in the present study. Rash was observed in 2% cases in the study of Gopal K et al.6 (2017), and in 29.33% cases in the study of Khan YM. et. Al11 (2016).In the present study, rash was seen in 26.78% cases. In the present study hepatomegaly was observed in 25 patients (25%) a comparable incidence of (14.2%) has been reported by Deshwal R. et al10 (2015). Kale AV et al7(2007) in his study of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Dengue Fever from a Tertiary Care Centre at Aurangabad Maharashtra India: An Observational Study showed similar results to the present study as fever (100%), myalgia (65.3%), headache(38.6%), vomiting(64%), retro-orbital pain (43.3%), abdominal pain (54.6%), rash (41.9%), positive tourniquet test (34.6%).Another study which was similar to present study wasKashinkunti MD et al8 (2013) a Study of Clinical Profile of Dengue Fever in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital showed fever was present in all cases and is the most common symptom followed by headache (90%),myalgia (81%), vomiting(56%), abdominal pain (48%). breathlessness 25%, skin rash (21%), and altered sensorium (13%). Hemorrhagic manifestations (21%) included petechiae, ecchymosis, gum bleeding, hematuria, malena, hematemesis and epistaxis. The occurrence of petechiae was found in the current study (i.e. 14%) when compared similar to the study of Khan YM. et. Al11 (2016). Haematuria was found in 10.34% in Khan YM. et. Al11 (2016) whereas it was2%l in our study. Differences between our study and Khan YM.et. Al11 (2016) was seen in higher percentage of PV bleeding, positive tourniquet test, epistaxis and Gingival bleeding in the latter as compared to the former. Thus, the most common haemorrhagic manifestation in the present study were hematemesis aseen in 16.07% patients, which correlates well with the findings of Wittesjo B et al12 (1993) and Cobra c et al13 (1995). The second most common haemorrhagic manifestation in the present study was GI bleeding in the form of haemetemesis and/or malena, which was seen in 10.71% patients this is comparable with finding of Wittesjo B et al12 (1993)Who have reported an incidence of 13.04% of GI bleeding. Although some authors have mentioned that a positive tourniquet test may be found in over 1/3rd of patients Cobra c et al13 (1995) in their study on 267 patients with DF have reported a positive tourniquet test only in 2.20% patients. The median duration of fever in the present study was 6 days (range 3- 10 days), While the median maximum body temperature was 39.0c (range 382-40.2c). Both these findings correlate with the study of Stephen c et al9(2002). However, only 18% patients had a typical biphasic course of fever in the present study as against 38% reported by Stephen c et al9(2002) most of the patients in the present study had continuous fever (82%). In laboratory parameters it was observed that a low white cell count was present in a significant number of patients with DF and DHF. Haemoconceration was found in only 4 patients (21.05%) with DHF. Liver enzymes were elevated in 10 patients (12.34%) with DF and in 8 Patients (42.10%) with DHF while deranged renal function tests were found in 4 patients (21.05%) with DHF and two patient (2.46%) with DF. Coagulation profile was deranged in 5 patients (26.30%) with DHF and in none of the patients with DF. Microscopic examination of urine samples did not show any evidence of haematuria in any of the patients in the study. Khan YM. et. Al11 (2016) in his Study in Nizamabad, Telangana State of India Among haematological parameters, raised haematocrit (>45%) was found in 35 (23.33%) and leukopenia (<4000/cmm) was found in 58 (38.66%) patients which was slightly lower than the present study findings. A similar finding to the current study of thrombocytopenia was observed in all the patients with varying severity, severe (<20000/cmm) was observed in 23 (15.33%) patients while moderate (20000- 50000/cmm) in 62 (41.33) patients. Platelet count at presentation was <50000 in about 56.66% of the patients. Minimum platelet count noted was 9000/cmm. Among biochemical parameters, raised serum bilirubin (>2mg%) was observed in 17 (11.33%) while raised SGOT (>45 IU/L), raised SGPT (>45 IU/L) were observed in 61 (40.66%) and 42 (28%)respectively, approximately 1/3rd to the present study i.e. 4.66% patients had raised serum creatinine (>1.5mg/dl). Another study resonated with the results found in the present study was of Gopal K et al.6 done in central India shows mean platelet count is 51286 /cumm platelet count, 40000-100000 noted in 63.81 % cases, < 20000 in 16.19% cases and > 100000 /cumm platelets count found in 3.80%. mean haemoglobin among study population was 11.61 gm% in our study population. 43.81% cases required blood products transfusion during their hospital course. Frequency of blood transfusion does not seems to be affected by low platelets count as bleeding manifested in subjects having count >50000 – 100000 also. Hepatic involvement was present in majority of cases in our study, we found serum ALT >45 in 22.85% cases and AST >45 seen in 19.04% cases. Deranged INR (>1.5 ) noted in 11.42 % cases. Rise in serum transaminases and coagulopathy was more in group of severe dengue as compared to dengue fever with warning signs and dengue fever without warning signs. There was 84.4% and 93.75% ALT and AST elevation respectively in dengue with warning signs and 94.5% and 95.9% ALT and AST elevation respectively in severe dengue and fulminant hepatic failure was observed in severe dengue.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The most common presenting symptom was fever. The 2nd most common symptom was bodyache. A large number of patients with dengue infection had headache, myagia and/or arthralgia, and retro- orbital pain.

  1. The median duration of fever was 6 days (range 3-10 days).
  2. Typical biphasic pattern of fever was seen in only a small number of patients.
  3. The most common haemorrhagic manifestations were haematemesis and malaena.
  4. A positive tourniquet test was found only in a small number of patients.
  5. Thrombocytopenia is an important haematological finding, both in DF and DHF patients.
  6. Leukopenia is found in majority of the patints with DF and DHF.
  7. DHF patients usually show one or more signs of plasma leak eg. Hypoalbuminmia, haemoconcentration, ascites and pleural effusion.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Halstead S.: The XXth century dengue pandemic: need for surveillance and research, World Health Stat Q 1992; 45:292-298.
  2. Jelinek T et al. Epidemiology and clinical features of imported dengue fever in Europe: Sentinel surveillance Data from TropNetEurop. Clinical infectious diseases 2002; 35 : 1047 – 52.
  3. Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever: its history and resurgence as a global public health problem, Wallingford, UK: CAB international, 1997: 1-22.
  4. Gubler DJ, Claark GG. Dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever:; the emergence of a global health problem. Emeg infect Dis 1995; 1:55-57.
  5. Pancharoen C, Tantawichien T, Thisyakorn C, Kulwichit W, et al. Dnegue infection: A Global Concern J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 85 (suppl 1); S25-S33.
  6. Gopal Krishna et al. A Study of Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Dengue Fever in Tertiary Care Centre in Central India, JMSCR Vol.05, Issue 06, Page 23251-23256; June2017
  7. Kale AV et al.. Clinical profile and outcome of dengue fever from a tertiary care centre at Aurangabad India: an observational study. J Dent Med Sci 2007;13(90):14–9.
  8. Kashinkunti MD, Shiddappa, Dhananjaya M. A study of clinical profile of dengue fever in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sch J Appl Med Sci 2013;1(4):280–2.
  9. Stephan CM. et al. A tourist with dengue fever and visual loss. Lancet 2002; 360: 1070.
  10. Deshwal et al. Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Dengue Fever. J. Association of Physicians of India, 2015, 63: 30-32.
  11. Khan, M.Yet al. A Study of Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Dengue Fever in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Nizamabad, Telangana, India. Int. J. Contemporary Med. Res., 2016; 3(8): 2383-87.
  12. Wittesjö B et. al Dengue fever among Swedish tourists, Scand J Infect Dis. 1993; 25(6):699-704.
  13. Cobra C, Rrigau – Perez JG, Kuno G. and Vorndam V symptoms of dengue fever in relation to host immunologic response and virus rerotype. Puerto rico; Am J empidemiol 1995(11); 142-11.
  14. Meena KC, Jelia S, Meena S, Arif M, Ajmera D A study of hematological profile in dengue fever at a tertiary care center, Kota Rajasthan. Int J Adv Med., 2016; 3(3): 621-624.

 

 

 


 


 



 


 

 


 

 

 


 


 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.