Home About Us Contact Us

 

Table of Content - Volume 6 Issue 2 - May 2017


 

Attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients of respiratory failure

 

Gajanan Vaijnath Halkanche1, Neelima Deshpande2*

 

1Associate Professor, 2Professor and HOD, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Latur, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: gajananhalkanche@rediffmail.com

 

Abstract              Background: Patients who are intubated and on mechanical ventilation are more prone to develop ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Comorbidities and other risk factors contribute to the mortality due to VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Aim: To assess the attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients of respiratory failure. Material and Methods: A total of 216 critically ill patients admitted in intensive respiratory care unit and who stayed for at least 2 days and received mechanical ventilation within 48 hours after ICU admission were studied. Laboratory investigations and microbiological culture was done. Results: Out of 182 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation, 47 (25.8%) patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia. Early-onset VAP were developed in 13 (27.6%) patients and late-onset VAP developed in 34 (72.3%) patients. The mortality in patients those developed VAP was 40.4%. Conclusion: Every effort should be taken to decrease the incidence of VAP in ICUs. Clinicians must focus on modifiable risk factors to minimize the incidence of VAP.

Key Words: Respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, ventilator associated pneumonia, mortality.

 

INTRODUCTION

Patients who are intubated and on mechanical ventilation are more prone to develop ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). It is defined as “pneumonia occurring after 48 hours of endotracheal intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilator”.1 VAP is the most commonly reported infection in ICUs, with mechanically ventilated patients being at highest risk. The incidence of VAP has ranged from 8 to 28%.2 VAP is associated with significant increases in hospital stay length and morbidity.3 The mortality rate of VAP patients is thought to depend on several factors, such as admission diagnosis, severity of illness at the time of VAP, type of microbial pathogen and resistance, and whether appropriate antibiotic treatment is provided in an adequate time. Late-onset VAP is often reported to be associated with higher mortality rates than early-onset VAP.4-6 Comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunocompromised,4 chronic heart failure, chronic hepatopathy, or chronic renal failure, are usually reported to increase the risk of death.4,7 The number of organ dysfunctions6 has been repeatedly associated with VAP prognosis. In this study, an attempt was made to assess the attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients of respiratory failure.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, a total of 216 critically ill patients admitted in intensive respiratory care unit (IRCU) at a tertiary referral and teaching institute who developed respiratory failure due to various conditions and diseases were studied. The present study was approved by the institute ethics committee. Patients who stayed in the ICU for at least 2 days and received mechanical ventilation within 48 hours after ICU admission were included in the study. VAP was defined as persistent pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiographs combined with purulent tracheal secretions, and/or body temperature greater than or equal to 38.58 C or less than or equal to 36.58 C, and/or peripheral blood leukocyte count greater than or equal to 103-109/L or less than or equal to 109/L. A definitive diagnosis of VAP required microbiological confirmation by culture from a protected specimen brush (>103 cfu/ml), plugged telescopic catheter specimen (> 103 cfu/ml), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid specimen (> 104 cfu/ml), or endotracheal aspirate (> 105 cfu/ml).

 

RESULTS

A total of 216 critically ill patients admitted in intensive respiratory care unit (IRCU) at a tertiary referral and teaching institute who developed respiratory failure due to various conditions and diseases were studied. Distribution of patients according to underlying disorder who required mechanical ventilation as below:

 

Table 1: Disease distribution and duration of mechanical ventilation

Disease

1 -3 days

4-7 days

8-14 days

>2 Week

Acute Respiratory Failure (n=150)

 

Poisoning (n=82)

23 (28%)

39 (47.6%)

14 (17.1%)

6 (7.3%)

ARDS (n=44)

20 (45.5%)

22 (50%)

2 (4.5%)

-

Snake Bite (n=24)

19 (79.2%)

5 (20.8%)

-

-

Acute Exacerbation of Chronic respiratory failure (n=29)

 

COPD (n=21)

10 (47.6%)

7 (33.3%)

4 (19%)

-

Bronchial Asthma (n=5)

4 (80%)

1 (20%)

-

-

Tuberculosis destroyed Lung (n=3)

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

-

1 (33.3%)

Coma (n=27)

 

Meningoencephalitis (n=18)

-

6 (33.3%)

7 (38.9%)

5 (27.8%)

CVA (n=9)

-

-

2 (33%)

7 (77.7%)

Neuromuscular disease (n=6)

 

Guillain-Bare syndrome (n=6)

-

 

2 (33.3%)

4 (66.7%)

Others (n=4)

 

Hanging (n=2)

1 (50%)

-

1 (50%)

-

Valvular Heart Disease (n=2)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

-

-

Total

79 (36.6%)

82 (38%)

32 (14.8%)

23 (10.6%)

Out of 216 patients put on mechanical ventilation, commonest duration of mechanical ventilator stay was 4-7 days in 82 (38%) of patients followed by 1-3 days in 79 (36.6%) patients. Shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (1-3 days) were required in 19 (79.2%) patients of acute respiratory failure due to neuroparalytic snake bite and 4 (80%) patients of acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma. Prolonged mechanical ventilation were required in 7 (77.7%) patients of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and 4 (66.7%) patients of Guillaine-Bare Syndrome. Out of 182 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation, 47 (25.8%) patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia.

 

Table 2: Ventilator associated pneumonia and causative organism

Causative Organism

Early onset pneumonia <5 Days

Late onset pneumonia >5 Days

Total

Pseudomonas aeroginosa

3

16

19

Klebsiella pneumoniae

3

14

1i7

Staphylococcus aureus

4

3

7

E. coli and Proteus Spp.

1

1

2

Acinetobacter Spp.

1

1

2

Total

13

34

47

 Out of 182 patients who required invasive ventilation 47 (25.8%) patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Early-onset VAP were developed in 13 (27.6%) patients and late-onset VAP developed in 34 (72.3%) patients. Most common offending organism isolated in patients of VAP were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40.4%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.2%). Staphylococcus aureus 4 (30.8%) was the most common organism isolated in patients with early onset ventilator associated pneumonia, whereas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 16 (47%) was the most common organism isolated in patients with late onset ventilator associated pneumonia.

 

Table 3: Ventilator Associated Pneumonia and Mortality

Condition

No. of patients

Survivors

Non survivors

VAP

47

29

19 (40.4%)

Non - VAP

135

90

44 (32.6%)

Total

182

119

63 (34.6%)

Overall mortality amongst 182 patients required invasive ventilator was 34.6%. The mortality in patients those developed VAP was 40.4% while 32.6% in patients those were not developed VAP.

 

DISCUSSION

In present study, the mortality in patients those developed VAP was 40.4% while 32.6% in patients those were not developed VAP. Kollef et al,8 reported estimated incidences of VAP ranges from 10 to 65% with fatality rates of 13% to 55%. Risk factors for development of VAP are longer duration of mechanical ventilation, advanced age, depressed level of consciousness, pre-existing lung disease, immune suppression from disease or medication, malnutrition. Persons with VAP have increased lengths of ICU hospitalization and have up to a 20-30% death rate.9 The mortality attributable to VAP has been reported to range between 0% and 50% in various studies.10-14 As shown by Hunter, VAP occurs in 9-27% of mechanically ventilated patients, with about five cases per 1000 ventilator days.15 The condition is associated with increased ICU and hospital stay and has an estimated attributable mortality of 9%.15 Out of 182 patients who required invasive ventilation 47 (25.8%) patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia. Early-onset VAP were developed in 13 (27.6%) patients and late-onset VAP developed in 34 (72.3%) patients. Cook found that, VAP occurs most often in the first week of MV.9 Fagon et al. suggested that the incidence of VAP increases by 1% per day of IMV.16 However, Cook et al., found that the incidence per day varies over time, with 3% per day during first 5 days of IMV, 2% for the second 5 days, and 1% for the subsequent 5-day period.17 This observation is supported by Ibrahim et al., who identified an incidence rate of VAP of 11.5%, 56% of which were early onset (≤5 day).18 Hence, the greatest attack rates appear to be during the initial days of MV. In our study, most common offending organism isolated in patients of VAP were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40.4%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.2%). Staphylococcus aureus 4 (30.8%) was the most common organism isolated in patients with early onset ventilator associated pneumonia, whereas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 16 (47%) was the most common organism isolated in patients with late onset ventilator associated pneumonia. Trivedi et al,19 reported an incidence of 9.38% of nosocomial pneumonia and 38% had ventilator associated pneumonia. Commonest organisms isolated in VAP were Pseudomonas (55%), Acinetobacter (20%), Staph. aureus (14.5%) and Klebsiella (75%). Violán et al50 reporated mortality rate of 34% for patients with nosocomial pneumonia compared to 17% in those without nosocomial and mortality as a result of VAP was especially high when it was caused by multi-drug resistant organisms like Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter species. To conclude, every effort should be taken to decrease the incidence of VAP in ICUs. Clinicians must focus on modifiable risk factors to minimize the incidence of VAP.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Trophy JM. Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. JAMA 2007; 297(14):1616.
  2. Klompas M, Platt R. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: the wrong quality measure for benchmarking. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:803-805.
  3. Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2184-2193.
  4. Mirsaeidi M, Peyrani P, Ramirez JA. Predicting mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: the APACHE II score versus the new IBMP-10 score. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:72–77.
  5. Moine P, Timsit JF, De Lassence A, et al. Mortality associated with late-onset pneumonia in the intensive care unit: results of a multicenter cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:154–163.
  6. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Fraser VJ, et al. Mechanical ventilation with or without 7-day circuit changes. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123:168–174.
  7. Hedrick TL, Smith RL, McElearney ST, et al. Differences in early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia between surgical and trauma patients in a combined surgical or trauma intensive care unit. J Trauma 2008; 64:714–720.
  8. Kollef MH, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: clinical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994 Nov; 163(5):1031-5.
  9. Cook D. Ventilator associated pneumonia: Perspectives on the burden of illness. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26 Suppl 1:S31-7.
  10. Baker AM, Meredith JW, Haponik EF. Pneumonia in intubated trauma patients. microbiology and outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:343-9.
  11. Craig CP, Connelly S. Effect of intensive care unit nosocomial pneumonia on duration of stay and mortality. Am J Infect Control 1984; 12:233-8.
  12. Cunnion KM, Weber DJ, Broadhead WE, Hanson LC, Pieper CF, Rutala WA. Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia: Comparing adult critical-care populations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:158-62.
  13. Kappstein I, Schulgen G, Beyer U, Geiger K, Schumacher M, Daschner FD. Prolongation of hospital stay and extra costs due to ventilator-associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11:504-8.
  14. Papazian L, Bregeon F, Thirion X, Gregoire R, Saux P, Denis JP, et al. Effect of ventilator-associated pneumonia on mortality and morbidity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154:91-7.
  15. Hunter JD. Ventilator associated pneumonia. BMJ 2012; 344:e3325.
  16. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Domart Y, Trouillet JL, Pierre J, Darne C, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation. Prospective analysis of 52 episodes with use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139:877-84.
  17. Cook DJ, Walter SD, Cook RJ, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Leasa D, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:433-40.
  18. Ibrahim EH, Ward S, Sherman G, Kollef MH. A comparative analysis of patients with early-onset vs late-onset nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU setting. Chest 2000;117:1434-42
  19. Trivedi TH, Shejale SB, Yeolekar ME. Nosocomial Pneumonia In Medical Intensive Care Unit. JAPI 2000; 48:1070-1073.
  20. Violán JS, et al. Impact of nosocomial pneumonia on the outcome of mechanically-ventilated patients. Critical Care 1998; 2:19-23. 


 


 


 


 

 

 


 


 



 


 

 


 

 

 


 


 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.