Home About Us Contact Us

 

Peer Review Process
Medpulse International Journal of Anatomy (MIJOANT) is an open access, peer-reviewed medical journal follows the Peer Review Guidelines according to
1. COPE with Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
2. Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals (WAME)
3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
4. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association

Medpulse International Journal of Anatomy follows the peer review system designed for each article published. Manuscript topics are normally approved by editor in chief. Formal peer review is conducted in collaboration with editorial board members and independent referees appointed by the editorial team of the journal. In case of a theme issue on a particular topic, the appointed Guest Editor is responsible for conducting peer review and to submit full review reports along with accepted manuscripts for the journal. We encourage our editorial teams to use the electronic submission and peer-review system to facilitate the peer-review process and support thorough record keeping. Section Policies


Original Research Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Case Reports

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Educational Forum

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Letter to the Editor

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Short Communication

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Corrigendum

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Other

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


The below given flowchart explains the manuscript submission at a glance. Once the manuscript is submitted for publication, it is subjected to screening, quality assessment, reviewing, and further production processing involving language assessment, figure improvement, preparation of proofs and incorporation of required corrections.

FLOW

There will possible three decisions regarding Manuscript submitted
1. Accepted.
2. Accepted with Minor/Moderate Corrections.
3. Rejected.

If minor corrections, Author should make necessary corrections within 7(Seven Days) of email received from editor.
If Moderate corrections, Author should make necessary corrections within 21(Twenty-One days) of email received from editor.

Peer review process takes minimum two weeks to eight weeks to review Manuscript given.
After receiving reviewers favorable comment's on Manuscript, Editorial board will make final decision about publication of Manuscript.

 
Journal Menu MIJOANT Subscription Aim & Scope Peer Review Process Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement Open Access Statement Plagiarism Policy Editorial Board Indexing Current Issue Publication Charges Archives Authors Information Copyright & Licensing Privacy Statement Ownership & Management Contact Us