Jyoti C Nayak^1*, R V Dave²

^1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, B.J. Medical College Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA.

Email: drjyoti.c.nayak@gmail.com

1. Esses SE, Botsford DJ (1997) surgical anatomy and operative approaches to the sacrum. In: Frymoyer JW, Ducker TB, Hadler NM (eds). The adult spine: principles and practice. Vol. II 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven,Philadelphia
2. Anatomy of abdomen and lower limb .vishramsingh 1^st ed. Page 16
3. Standring S. The Back.In: Gray’s Anatomy’s Sacrum.40th ed.Edinburg,UK: Churchill Livingstone 2008 : 724
4. Edwards WB, Hingson RA. Continuous caudal anaesthesia in obstetrics. American journal of surgery 1942;57:459-46
5. Nagar SK. A study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2004;53(2): 18 – 21
6. Vandana K P . Morphometric Study of Sacral Hiatus For Caudal EpiduralBlock (Ceb) in Adult Human Dry Sacrum in Central India. Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | March 2016: 224-227
7. Vinod kumar, Pandey SN, Bajpai RN, Jain PN, Longia GS. Morphometricalstudy of sacral hiatus. Journal of Anatomical Society of India1992; 41(1):7-13
8. Trotter M, Letterman GS, Variation of female sacrum; their significance in continuous caudalanalgesia.Surg. Gynaecol.Obstet.1944;78(4):419-24
9. Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Saton K, Kikuchi S. An anatomical study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successfulcaudal epidural block. Clin. J. Pain.2004;20(1):51-54.
10. A. Agrawal , H. Kaur , Yatindra K. Anatomical Consideration of Caudal Epidural Space. A cadaver study. Clinical Anatomy .2009 ; 22: 730-37.