^1,4Associate Professor, ³Tutor, ⁵Professor, Department of Anatomy, A.C.S Medical College and Hospital, Velapanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

²Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313001, INDIA.

Email: shrumukundan@gmail.com, aprajita.johri@gmail.com, chanemou@gmail.com, drshashibhushang@gmail.com,

kaushikrekhaa@gmail.com

REFERENCES

1. Foley R, Smilansky J, Bughman E, Sajid A. A departmental approach for improving lecture skills of medical teachers. Med Educ 1976; 10: 369-373.
2.  Nasmith L, Steinert Y. The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive lecturing. Teach Learn Med 2001; 13: 43-48.
3. Byrne PS, Harris CM, Long BEL. Teaching the teachers. Med Educ 1976;
4. West DC, Pomerory JR, Park JK, et al. Critical thinking in graduate medical education: a role of concept mapping assessment? JAMA 2000;284(9):1105–10.
5. Cahill DR, Dalley AF. A course in gross anatomy notes and comments. Clin Anat 1990;3:227-36.
6. Dohner, C.W. and D.D. Hunt 1989 Independent study in medical science. Acad. Med., 64:654-655.
7. Barrows H, Tamblyn R. An evaluation of problem-based learning in small groups utilizing a stimulated patient. J Med Edu. 1976;51:52–54
8.  Krajcik, JS, Czerniak, CM and Berger, CF. Teaching science: a project-based approach, McGraw-Hill College, New York. 1999.
9. Barrows, H.S. and R.M. Tamblyn 1980 Problem-Based Learning. An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
10. weingarten R. The case for smaller classes. Education update, (online) 2003 sep (cited 2009 April 5). Available from URL: http://www.education update. Com/ archieves/2003/sept 03/ issue/metre_randi.htm
11. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. [Monograph on the Internet]. Springfield (MA): Merriam Webster; 2006. [Accessed May 2010]. Available from: http://www. merriam-webster.com
12. James R, Baldwin G. Tutoring and demonstrating: a guide for the university of Melbourne.(monographon the internet). Melbourne: Centre for the study of higher education. The university of Melbourne Australia; 1917. (Cited April 2006). Available from; http://www.cshe. unimelb.edu.aut/bookpages/chap 1html
13. Amir et al. The First Year Medical Students’ Perception of and Satisfaction from Problem-based Learning Compared to Traditional Teaching in Gross Anatomy: Introducing Problem-based Anatomy into a Traditional Curriculum in Iran,Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2007 Jan; 1(1): 113–118.
14. Zuzana de Jong,Jessica AB van Nies, Sonja WM Peters, Sylvia Vink, Friedo W Dekker, Albert Scherpbier. Interactive Seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical education. 2010;10:79-82
15. Rathnakar UP, Gopalakrishna HN, Pai PG, Ullas SD, Pemminati S, Pai MRSM, et al. Didactic lectures and interactive sessions in small groups, a comparative study among undergraduate students of Pharmacology in India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010;4:2260- 2264.
16. Nyemb PMMA. Studying anatomy through a problem-based learning approach. MOJ Anat Physiol. 2017;4(5):377‒379. DOI: 10.15406/mojap.2017.04.00150
17. Shetty JK, Begum S, Goud MBK, et al. Comparison of didactic lectures and case-based learning in an undergraduate biochemistry course at RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, UAE. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5(50): 3212-3216, DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2016/745
18. Gino Abraham, Geethadevi Madhavikutty. A comparative study on the effectiveness of interactive lecture and tutorial as teaching methodology among undergraduate medical students. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2016;3(11):3406-3409
19. J. Margaret Viola1 , A.R.Radhika2 , G. Deepthi Reddy3, IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 15, Issue 9 Ver. VI (September). 2016), PP 48-53 www.iosrjournals.org.