Home About Us Contact Us

 


 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 1 - April 2021


A study of variations in the morphology and morphometry of scapular glenoid fossa

 

V Lakshmi1, P Kanagavalli2*

 

1Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai -600001, INDIA.

2Associate Professor, Institute of Anatomy, Madras Medical College, Chennai -600003, INDIA.

Email: drkanagashankar@gmail.com

Abstract              Background: Scapula (or) shoulder blade is a flat, triangular bone present at the back of the thoracic cage. It bears glenoid fossa on its lateral angle, which articulates with head of humerus to form a synovial ball and socket glenohumeral joint (shoulder joint). It is the most frequent joint to dislocate, because of incongruent articular surfaces.so the present study is mainly aimed at the morphological and morphometry of glenoid fossa. Materials And Methods: The study was conducted in 50 adult dry human scapulae, at Madras Medical College, Chennai. The different shapes of glenoid fossa were observed, morphometry of glenoid fossa were measured using vernier caliper and the findings were tabulated. Results: In the present study 50 scapulae studied (25 right and 25 left), the average anteroposterior diameter was 23.35 mm (22.8 mm on the right side and 23.9 mm on the left side) and the average superoinferior diameter was 37.3 mm (35.3 mm on the right side and 39.3 mm on the left side). Glenoid Cavity Index was 62.6 mm (64.2 mm on the right side and 60.8 mm on the left side).by the presence or absence of glenoid notch the shape of glenoid fossae were classified into pear, oval and inverted comma shape.in the present study most common shape observed was pear (R-52%, L-56%) followed by inverted comma (R-24%, L-28%) and oval(R-24%.,L-16%). Conclusion: variations in the morphology and morphometry of glenoid fossa are important for understanding of specific abnormalities of shoulder joint like instability, dislocation, glenoidal labral injuries. The findings of present study will provide anatomical knowledge of glenoid fossa during surgical orthopedic

 

INTRODUCTION

Scapula is a large flat triangular bone in the posterolateral aspect of thoracic cage. The lateral angle of scapula is truncated to form the glenoid fossa which articulates with the head of humerus to form the shoulder joint. This glenoid fossa may be regarded as head of scapula connected to the plate like body by an inconspicuous neck. Shoulder joint is prone for frequent dislocations due to the small and shallow glenoid fossa. Which is deepened by fibrocartilaginous rim, glenoidal labarum. Therefore, a sound knowledge of variations in the morphology and morphometry of glenoid fossa is essential in diagnosis and surgical management of shoulder pathologies.1,2,6,7

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

50 dry human scapulae (right -25; left-25) of unknown sex from the Institute of Anatomy, Madras Medical College were studied for variations in shape and dimensions of the glenoid fossa. Measurements were taken by using digital Vernier callipers. Shape of the glenoid fossa was determined by taking an imprint of the glenoid rim on a white paper.

The following parameters were measured

Vertical glenoid diameter (Superoinferior diameter).

Transverse glenoid diameter (Anteroposterior diameter).

Shape of the glenoid fossa.

Glenoid cavity index = Transverse glenoid diameter X 100.

Vertical glenoid diameter.

 

RESULTS

In the present study total of 50 dry human scapular glenoid fossa were studied, out of which 25 on the right side,25 on the left side. vertical glenoid diameter, transverse glenoid diameters were measured and glenoid cavity index was calculated. Shape of glenoid fossae were observed.

Vertical glenoid diameter:

The average vertical glenoid diameter on the right side was observed as 35.3mm, the average vertical glenoid diameter on the left side was 39.3mm. The average vertical glenoid diameter on both side was calculated as 37.3mm.

Transverse glenoid diameter:

The average Transverse glenoid diameter on the right side was observed as 22.8mm, the average Transverse glenoid diameter on the left side was observed as 23.9mm, The average Transverse glenoid diameter on both side was calculated as 23.3mm.

Glenoid cavity index

The average glenoid cavity index on the right was calculated as 64.2%, The average glenoid cavity index on the left was calculated as 60.8%, The average glenoid cavity index on each side was calculated as 62.2%

Shape of the glenoid fossa:

In 50 scapulae studied, by the presence or absence of glenoid notch the shape of glenoid fossae were classified into pear, oval and inverted comma shape. In the present study most common shape observed was pear(R-52%,L-56%) followed by inverted comma(R-24%,L-28%) and oval(R-24%.,L-16%).


 

Table 1: Parameters

Side

Vertical glenoid diameter (mm)

Transverse glenoid diameter (mm)

Glenoid cavity index(%)

Right n=25

35.3

22.8

64.2

Left n=25

39.3

23.9

60.8

Average n=50

37.3

23.3

62.6

 

Table 2: Shape

Side

Pear(%)

Oval(%)

Inverted comma(%)

Right (n=25)

52

24

24

Left (n=25)

56

16

28

 

Table 3:

Author

Vertical glenoid diameter (mm)

Transverse glenoid diameter (mm)

Glenoid cavity Index (%)

R

L

R

L

R

L

Archana singh et al., 2019

34.8

33.40

24.3

25.5

69.8

76.3

Mamatha T et al.

(R-98,L-104),2011

33.6

33.9

23.3

23.0

69.3

67.8

Neeta Chhabra et al.

(R-55,L-71),2015

38.7

39.0

24.8

25.0

64.3

63.6

Rajput HB et al.

(R-43,L-57),2012

34.7

34.4

23.3

22.9

67.1

66.5

Gupta et al.

(R-30,L-30)

34.9

33.0

23.1

2.6

66.1

62.4

Present study

(R-25 ,L-25)

35.3

35.4

22.9

24.0

64.9

67.8

 

Table 4: Shape of the glenoid fossa

Author

Pear

Oval

Inverted comma

R

L

R

L

R

L

Archana Singh et al. (R-56, L-54) 2019

43

45

36

32

21

23

Mamatha T et al.

(R-98,L-104),2011

46

43

20

24

34

33

Neeta Chhabra et al.

(R-55,L-71),2015

47

55

31

32

22

13

Rajput HB et

(R-43,L-57),2012

49

46

16

15

35

39

Gupta et al.

(R-30,L-30)

43

40

17

23

40

37

Present study

(R-25 ,L-25)

52

56

24

16

24

28


DISCUSSION

In the present study mean vertical diameter of the glenoid fossa on the right side is 35.3mm which is higher than the findings of Mamtha T et al., Archna singh et al. and Rajput et al.5,3,8 and lower than Neeta Chhabra et al.4. Mean vertical diameter of the glenoid fossa on left side is 35.4mm. It is higher than the values measured by Archana et al., Mamatha et al., Rajput HB et al. and Gupta et al.3,5,8. It is lower than the findings of Neeta Chhabra et al.4. In the present study mean transverse glenoid diameter on the right was measured as 22.9mm which is lower than the findings of Archana Singh et al., Neeta Chhabra et el, Rajput HB et al.3,4,8,mean transverse glenoid diameter on the left side was measured as 24.0mm, which is higher than the findings of Gupta et al., Rajput et al.(11)(8), lower than the findings of Archana Singh et al., Neeta Chhabra et al.3,4. In the present study mean percentage of glenoid cavity index on the right side was observed as 64.9 %which is nearer to the findings of Neeta Chhabra, lower than the findings of Archana Singh et al., Mamatha T et al., Rajput HB et al.3,5,8. In the present study mean percentage of glenoid cavity index on the left side was 67.8% which is similar to the findings of Mamatha T et al.5, higher than the findings of Neeta Chhabra et al.4, Gupta et al.11, lower than the findings of Archana Singh et al.3 In the present study the frequent shape of glenoid fossa on both side is pear shape, which correlates with the findings of Neeta Chhabra et al.4, second frequent shape is inverted comma, which correlates with the findings of Mamatha T et al.5, least common shape is oval, which correlates with the findings of Rajput HB et al., Gupta et al.8,11.

 

CONCLUSION

Shoulder joint is an inherent instable joint due to the small and shallow glenoid fossa and large humeral head. Presence of notch on the anterior margin of glenoid rim prevents firm adherence of glenoidal labarum to the rim, leading to labral tears. A sound knowledge of the variations in shape and dimensions of glenoid fossa is essential in diagnosing shoulder pathologies, performing shoulder surgeries and designing and fitting of shoulder prosthesis.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Standarding,Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice.40th ed,London:Elsevier Churchill Livingstone;2008;795,796.
  2. R.Shane Tubbs,Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variations.1st ed,John Wiley andsons;2016;44,45.
  3. Archana singh et al., A morphological and Morphometric Study of Glenoid Fossa of Scapula and its Implication in Shoulder Arthroplasty
  4. Neeta Chhabra et al., An anatomical study of glenoid cavity: its importance in shoulder prosthesis
  5. Mamatha T, Pai SR, Murlimanju BV, Kalthur SG, Pai MM, Kumar B. Morphometry of Glenoid Cavity. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2011;10(3):7 U
  6. Sinnatamby CS. Last’s Anatomy, Regional and Applied. 11th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 50-52.
  7. Breathnach AS. Frazer’s Anatomy of the Human Skeleton. 6th ed. London: J and A Churchill Ltd; 1965. p. 63- 70
  8. Rajput HB,Vyas KK,Shroff BD.A study of morphological patterns of glenoid cavity of scapula.National J Med Res.2012;2(4):504-07
  9. Prescher A,Klumpen T.glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula.J Anat. 1997;190(pt3):457-60
  10. Churchill RS, BremsJJ Kotschi H.Glenoid size,inclination,and version:An anatomic study.J shoulder Elbow Surg.2001;10(4):327-32
  11. Sangeetha gupta, Rachna Magotra and Manmeet Kour.Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, Vol.4,Issue 45.

 











 



 








 





Policy for Articles with Open Access:

Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics (Print ISSN: 2579-0897) (Online ISSN: 2636-4662) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.