Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 9 Issue 1 - January 2019

Correlation between arterial and end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure during laparoscopic surgeries

 

Upendra M Kanzarkar1*, Anjali Savargaonkar2

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, INDIA.

2Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: upendraigmc@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (etCO2) monitoring is used as an indirect measure of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2). To prevent hypercapnia, close intraoperative monitoring of etCO2 or PaCO2 and appropriate ventilatory changes are necessary. Aim: To evaluate the correlation between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide during laparoscopic surgeries. Material and Methods: A total of 40 non-obese adult patients of either sex, between 18 to 60 years of age and ASA status I, posted for elective laparoscopic surgery were included. Measurement and comparison done between preinsufflation values of etCO2, a-etCO2 gradient and their respective predesufflation values. Results: In present study, a-etCO2 gradient increased with pneumoperitoneum to 7.58±2.11 mmHg at predesufflation period as compared to 5.55±2.07 mmHg at preinsufflation period and this change of 2.03±1.35 mmHg was found to be highly significant (p<0.001). We observed change in a-etCO2 gradient to be more in Trendelenburg position (2.20±1.51 mmHg) as compared to antitrendelenburg position (1.82±1.15 mmHg); however, this difference is not significant statistically. Change in a-etCO2 gradient has highly significant, positive correlation with duration of pneumoperitoneum (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Increase in a-etCO2 gradient with pneumoperitoneum indicating loss of correlation between etCO2 and PaCO2 during pneumoperitoneum and thus etCO2 is less accurate in reflecting PaCO2.

Key Words: Laparoscopic surgeries, pneumoperitoneum, End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure.

 

Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive surgery and promoted as gentle surgery, still the procedure is not risk free. Reduction in functional residual capacity (FRC) occurs with general anaesthesia is compounded by CO2 induced pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning of patients.1End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (etCO2) monitoring is used as an indirect measure of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2). To prevent hypercapnia, close intraoperative monitoring of etCO2 or PaCO2 and appropriate ventilatory changes are necessary. There is some disagreement whether etCO2 is reliable in predicting the PaCO2 in laparoscopic procedures with CO2 insufflations. Although etCO2 is an easily accessible monitoring parameter, it often underestimates the true level of PaCO2.2 Thus, relying on etCO2, anaesthesiologist may not be able to execute appropriate ventilatory changes to eliminate increased CO2 load to prevent systemic acidosis. Keeping in mind all these controversies regarding dependence on etCO2 for monitoring of PaCO2 during laparoscopic surgeries even in healthy patients and necessity of their anticipation in compromised patients, the present study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide during laparoscopic surgeries.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology of a Tertiary Care Hospital, after approval by the hospital’s ethics committee.Patients posted for elective laparoscopic surgery, which included laparoscopic appendicectomy, cholecystectomy, adhesiolysis, hydatid cysts removal, or aspiration, abdominoperineal resection, and gonadal vein ligation.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age from 18-60 years
  • Patients of either sex.
  • Patients posted for elective laparoscopic surgery.
  • ASA physical status I/II.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significant cardiovascular morbidity (ASA III and IV).
  • Patients with respiratory disorders e.g. asthma, chronic-obstructive-pulmonary disorder, pulmonary tuberculosis, history of pulmonary resection.
  • Abnormal modified Allen’s test suggestive of inadequate collateral circulation in the hand.
  • Coagulopathy or patients on anti-coagulant therapy.
  • Chronic smokers,
  • Obese patients with BMI > 25 Kg/m2.
  • Patient’s refusal.

Sample Size: Based on a previous study,3 a sample size of 40 patients was calculated using values of confidence level = 90%, level of significance=5% and relative precision= 5%.

Methodology: A detailed preanaesthetic evaluation including history of present illness, general examination, systemic examination, airway assessment was carried out in each patient.Appropriate laboratory tests and radiological investigations were carried out and results noted. Patients were premedicated withi.v. Ranitidine 50mg andi.v.Glycopyrrolate 0.004mg/kg. Sedation given with i.v. Midazolam 0.02mg/kg and i.v. Fentanyl 2mg/kg. Baseline vital parameters were noted after premedication and sedation, but before induction. Patients were preoxygenated with 100% O2 on mask for 3 min.Induction of general anaesthesia was done with i.v.Propofol 2mg/kg and i.v.Vecuronium 0.15mg/kg and the patient was ventilated for 3 min on mask on O2 + N2O + Sevoflurane / Isoflurane.Intubation was done, controlled mechanical ventilation was started and anaesthesia was maintained on O2 and N2O in ratio of 50:50 along with inhalational anaesthetic agent (2% Sevoflurane or 1.2% Isoflurane) on semiclosed circle system with CO2 absorber and flow rate of 4 lit/min. Mechanical ventilation was adjusted by changing respiratory rate to maintain etCO2 between 30 to 40 mmHg while tidal volume was kept constant at 10 ml/kg.Intraoperatively, intermittent doses of I.V. Vecuronium bromide 0.02 mg/kg were used for muscle relaxation according to neuromuscular monitoring. All patients received i.m. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg after endotracheal intubation. Maintenance doses of i.v. Fentanyl 0.5 µg/kg were given intraoperatively at every 60 min. Baseline arterial blood sample was taken anaerobically. etCO2 value was noted down at the time of arterial blood sampling. After arterial sampling, pneumoperitoneum was created with carbon dioxide.Intra-abdominal pressure [I.A.P.] was maintained between 12-16 mmHg, and was monitored, and recorded. Apart from this, other parameters recorded during pneumoperitoneum were (1) Rate of CO2 insufflation and (2) patient positioning. Second arterial blood sample was taken just before carbon-dioxide desufflation by the above-mentioned technique with simultaneous recording of etCO2 at the time of sampling. Any intraoperative complications were managed accordingly. At the end of surgery, reversal of neuromuscular blockade was done with i.v. Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and i.v.Glycopyrrolate 10 mgm/kg. Postoperatively, vital parameters like respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood pressure were monitored and any complaints including nausea, vomiting managed accordingly before the patients were shifted to ward. Intra and postoperative complications were noted.

Statistical Analysis: Data was analyzed on statistical software STATA 10.0.Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables were expressed in percentage (%). All Continuous variables were compared by paired t-test. Mean change in a-etCO2 gradient as compared to I.A.P. at 3 levels was compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparison test of Bonferroni; correlation between duration of pneumoperitoneum and a-etCO2 gradient was assessed by calculating correlation coefficient “r”. Association between number of patients and acid base alterations was assessed by chi-square test.p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

The study included 40 adult patients of either sex, scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic surgical procedures. In present study, age group ranged from 18-60 years, mean age of study population was 34.85±12.08 years. Study involved 13 male and 27 female patients. Mean BMI of study population was 19.6±2.65 kg/m2 which indicated weight distribution in the patient group. Study involved 45% patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2, while 55% patients were with BMI between 18.6 to 24.99 kg/m2.There were no over-weight patients (BMI > 25 kg/m2) in the study. All patients of both sexes belonged to ASA-I category. Laparoscopic appendicectomy19 (47.5%), Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 15 (37.5%) were the major surgeries performed followed by Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and Laparoscopic APR in 2 (5%) patients each, Laparoscopic cyst aspiration and Laparoscopic gonadal vein ligation in one (2.5%) patient each. Average duration of laparoscopic surgery was 81.45 ± 51.38 min with range of 30 to 250 min. Average duration of pneumoperitoneum was 68.62 ± 48.10 min, ranging from 20 to 218 min.

 

Table 1: Comparison of Mean etCO2during pneumoperitoneum (mmHg) with Preinsufflation value

Interval

 

Mean etCO2

(Mean ± S.D.)

Baseline etCO2

(Mean ± S.D.)

Significance

Preinsufflation, n= 40

31.18±3.45

---

p>0.05, NS

Pneumoperitoneum

 

 

 

5 min, n= 40

32.12±2.83

31.18±3.45

p<0.001,HS

10 min, n= 40

32.58±2.83

31.18±3.45

p<0.001, HS

20 min, n= 39

32.63±3.42

31.16±3.49

p<0.001, HS

30 min, n= 37

32.87±2.93

30.98±3.49

p<0.001, H.S

40 min, n= 29

32.90±3.19

31.11±3.48

p<0.001, HS

50 min, n= 22

32.82±3.78

30.67±3.73

p<0.05, S

60 min, n= 17

33.55±3.15

30.75±4.06

p<0.001, HS

90 min, n= 10

33.41±3.64

29.96±3.67

p<0.05, S

120 min, n= 7

32.87±2.97

28.44±3.93

p<0.05, S

150 min, n= 3

33.37±4.15

30.37±2.51

---

180 min, n =2

32.50±3.54

30.50±3.54

---

210 min, n= 1

36.00±0.00

33.00±0.00

---

Predesufflation, n=40

32.93±3.69

31.18±3.45

p<0.05, S

   NS-Non-significant, S- Significant, HS- Highly significant.

 

Duration of pneumoperitoneum varied in different patients in our study and affected the baseline value for mean etCO2 at different time intervals. Mean preinsufflation etCO2 was 31.18 ± 3.45 mmHg at time of sampling; it showed highly significant increase from baseline at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min. of insufflation (p< 0.001). Again, at 60 min, mean etCO2 increased highly significantly to 33.55 ± 3.14 mmHg from baseline (p <0.001). At 50, 90, 120 min change was significant (p <0.05). During rest of pneumoperitoneum we may not able to comment on significance of change in mean etCO2 at time interval of 150, 180 and 210 min as only 3, 2 and 1 patients respectively, had this much period of pneumoperitoneum. etCO2 showed a tendency to increase with duration of pneumoperitoneum. etCO2 increased significantly at predesufflation arterial sampling time as compared to preinsufflation arterial sampling time. A total of 18 (45%) patients were in reverse trendelenburg position (head high) during procedure and 22 (55%) patients were in trendelenburg position (head low) during procedure.

 

Table 2: Comparison of changes in mean Arterial to end tidal CO2gradient (mmHg) between preinsufflation and

 

Pre-insufflation

(P.I.)

(Mean ± SD)

Predesufflation(P.D.)

(Mean ± SD)

Change

Mean ±SD

(%)

p value

 

PaCO2

(mmHg)

36.73±3.96

40.52±4.19

3.78±4.11

(10.32 %)

p <0.001

HS

etCO2

(mmHg)

31.18±3.45

32.93±3.69

1.76±3.61

(5.61 %)

p <0.05

S

a-etCO2 Gradient

(mmHg)

5.55±2.07

7.58±2.11

2.03±1.35

(36.58 %)

p <0.001

HS

     NS-Non-significant, S- Significant, HS- Highly significant

 

Highly significant (p<0.001) increase in mean PaCO2 was seen during pneumoperitoneum as compared to preinsufflation value with a mean change of 3.78±4.11mmHg. Mean etCO2 has shown significant change (p < 0.05) of 1.76 ± 3.61 during pneumoperitoneum from 32.93 ± 3.69 mmHg as compared to preinsufflation value of 31.18 ± 3.45 mmHg. Mean a-etCO2 gradient changed highly significantly (p < 0.001) by 2.03 ± 1.35 mmHg during pneumoperitoneum as compared to before insufflation value. Mean a-etCO2 gradient was 5.55 ±2.07 mmHg before pneumoperitoneum, which increased highly significantly to 7.58 ± 2.11 mmHg during pneumoperitoneum. In trendelenburg position, mean a-etCO2 gradient was on higher side i.e.2.20 ± 1.51 mmHg as compared to 1.82 ± 1.51 mmHg in antitrendelenburg position, but this was not a significant difference statistically (p>0.05). Coefficient of correlation r = +0.6303, and p < 0.001, showed highly significant positive correlation between duration of pneumoperitoneum and a-etCO2 gradient. Mean a-etCO2 value showed persistently increasing trend with duration of pneumoperitoneum. The mean a-etCO2 value was always above the baseline value of a-etCO2 gradient, during pneumoperitoneum. No significant (p > 0.05) correlation was seen between I.A.P. and mean change in a-etCO2 gradient with pneumoperitoneum. The change in PaCO2 has significant positive correlation with change in a-etCO2 gradient and the change in etCO2 does not have any significant correlation with change in a-etCO2 gradient. No major hemodynamic or anaesthesia related complication encountered during operative procedure or pneumoperitoneum.

 

DISCUSSION

End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure(etCO2) monitoring is increasingly used during anaesthesia as an indirect measure of PaCO2. Routinely anaesthesiologists rely on etCO2 monitoring for detection of hypercarbia. Value of a-etCO2 depends on many factors including ventilation – perfusion distribution within lung (V/Q), changes in FRC and changes in CO2 production (VCO2). In many countries, etCO2 monitoring has been made mandatory for laparoscopic surgeries. During laparoscopic surgery, Trendelenburg position together with peritoneal insufflation of CO2 reduces FRC and increases VCO2, and leads to changes in V/Q distribution due to basal lung compression and redistribution of hydrostatic forces. Thus, a-etCO2 is expected to change further during laparoscopy. Many studies concluded that, a-etCO2 gradient increased with pneumoperitoneum and etCO2 measurements grossly underestimate PaCO2 levels and are unreliable for ventilatory adjustments because of increased dead space ventilation secondary to V-Q mismatching.4-7 In present study, we have analyzed a-etCO2 gradient before and during CO2 pneumoperitoneum and evaluated changes in it with pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries. We also assessed correlation of a-etCO2 gradient with duration of pneumoperitoneum, I.A.P., and patients positioning. To study a-etCO2 gradient in present study, we analyzed arterial blood sample taken before CO2 insufflation (preinsufflation sample) and just before CO2 desufflation (predesufflation sample) for PaCO2 and these values were compared with etCO2 value at the time of arterial blood sampling. Arterial to end tidal carbon dioxide gradient calculated from this data. In present study, etCO2 was monitored and maintained constantly between 30 to 40 mmHg during procedure, i.e. before and during CO2 pneumoperitoneum by increasing respiratory rate and minute ventilation. It is well known fact that, CO2 absorption and finally its elimination through lung during CO2 pneumoperitoneum had persistently shown increase in CO2 concentration in expired tidal volume. Studies have shown persistent increasing trend of etCO2 value with duration of pneumoperitoneum4,8,9 Other studies10,11found an increase in etCO2 concentration maximum up to 40 to 60 min of pneumoperitoneum, and thereafter it becomes stable. Duration of pneumoperitoneum varied in different patients in our study. Mean etCO2 values at any period represents only specific number of patients and not all the patients. In our study mean etCO2 measurement showed increasing trend with duration of pneumoperitoneum but was not significant statistically. Some authors found increase in gradient4-7 while others found no significant change in it1,12-14 Preinsufflation values of a-etCO2 gradients in our patients were similar to other studies1,15-17and increase in gradient with laparoscopy was only approximately 2.03 mmHg, but still highly significant (p<0.001) change from preinsufflation value. This increase in gradient may have occurred secondary to increase in dead space ventilation following CO2 pneumoperitoneum and cephalad shift of diaphragm leading to decreased pulmonary compliance or decrease in cardiac output and resultant altered V-Q perfusion relationship. There were no negative values of gradient during laparoscopy among our patients. Several reports18,19have indicated that a-etCO2 gradient has tendency to increase or to become unpredictable with time in prolonged laparoscopies and especially in patients with pulmonary disorders, where authors recommended radial artery cannulation and frequent blood gas analysis. In our study, 18 patients are in anti-Trendelenburg position and 22 patients in Trendelenburg position. Mean a-etCO2 gradient was on higher side i.e. 2.20±1.51 mmHg with Trendelenburg position, as compared to 1.82±1.51 mmHg in anti-Trendelenburg position, which may have occurred because of more decrease in F.R.C. in Trendelenburg positioning, but this was not a significant difference statistically (p>0.05). Analysis of data indicates positioning of patient has minor but non-significant effects on a-etCO2 gradient. Some other studies, where author studied effect of position on a-etCO2 gradient found that, different patient positioning during pneumoperitoneum does not affect a-etCO2 gradient significantly.4 Increase in mean a-etCO2 gradient in our patients was 2.03 ± 1.35 mmHg (35%), this much increase was seen in healthy patients. Even higher increase in gradient is expected in patients with cardiac or pulmonary diseases; undergoing laparoscopy6. This makes ventilatory adjustments of these patients, based on etCO2 measurements, difficult and at times dangerous retention of CO2 with hazardous complications may occur.

CONCLUSION

Increase in a-etCO2 gradient with pneumoperitoneum indicates loss of correlation between etCO2 and PaCO2 during pneumoperitoneum and thus etCO2 is less accurate in reflecting PaCO2. The loss of correlation between etCO2 and PaCO2 during laparoscopy may even be more exaggerated in patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases with significant anaesthetic implications.

 

REFERENCES

    • Wahba RWM, Mamazza J. Ventilatory requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:206-10.
    • Naguyen N, Wolfe BM. The physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2005 February; 241(2):219-226.
    • Hirvonen E, et al. Ventilatory effects, blood gas changes and 02 consumption during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1995; 80(5):961-966.
    • Aoki A. Augmented arterial to end-tidal PCO2 difference during laparoscopic CO2 insufflation in man. Japanese Journal of Physiology 1993; 43:361-369.
    • Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, et al. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. AnesthAnalg 1993; 76:1067-1071.
    • Monk TG, Weldon BC, Lemon D. Alterations in pulmonary function during laparoscopic surgery. AnesthAnalg 1993; 76(Supplement):S274.
    • Feig BW, Berger DH, Dougherty TB, et al. Pulmonary effects of CO2 abdominal insufflations (CAI) during laparoscopy in high risk patients.Anesthesia Analgesia 1994;78;S108.
    • Iwasaka H, et al. respiratory mechanics and aterial blood gases during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesiology 1996;43(2):129-33.
    • Uen YH, Liang AI. Randomized comparison of carbon diaoxide in sufflation and abdominal wall lifting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J LaparoEndoscAdvSurgTech 2002;12(1):7-14.
    • Baraka A, Jabbour S, HammoundR, et al. End tidal carbon dioxide tension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesthesia 1994; 49:304-306.
    • Dorsay DA, Greene FL, Baysinger CL.Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy monitored with transesophageal echocardiography. SurgEndosc1995; 9:128–133.
    • Bongard FS, Pianim NA, Leighton TA, et al.Helium insufflation for laparoscopic operation.SurgGynecolObstet 1993 Aug; 177(2):140-6.
    • Tan PL, Lee TL, Tweed WA. Carbon dioxide absorption and gas exchange during pelvic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:677-81.
    • Wurst H, Schulte-Steinberg H, Finsterer U. Pulmonary CO2-elimination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical study (German). Anaesthesist 1993; 42: 427-34.
    • Gehring H, Kuhmann K, Klotz KF, et al.Effects of propofol vs isoflurane on respiratory gas exchange during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.ActaAnaesthesiolScand 1998 Feb;42(2):189-94.
    • Sprung J, WhalleyDGili, Falcone T, et al. The effects of tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. AnesthAnalg 2003; 97:268–274.
    • Tanaka T, Satoh K, Torii Y, Suzuki M. Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Masui 2006 Aug; 55(8):988-91.
    • Liu S-Y, Leighton TA, Davies I, et al. Prospective analysis ofcardiopulmonary response to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JLaparoendoscSurg 1991; 5:241-46.
    • Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald S, Baudendistel L, Dahms T, Kaminski D. Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg1991; 126: 997–1001.