Home| Journals | About Us|Contact Us|www.statperson.com

 
Untitled Document

[Abstract] [PDF] [HTML] [Linked References]

 

Analysis and outcome of difficult cholecystectomy managed laparoscopicaly

Abhishek Jadhav1*, Syed Obaid2

1,2Assistant Professor, Department of General surgery, jiiu’s iimsr Medical College, Warudi, Jalna, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: drsyedobaid@gmail.com, abhishekjadhavbeed@gmail.com

Research Article

 

Abstract               Introduction: laproscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. Difficult gall bladder is difficult to define. In this study we tried to precisely define difficult gall bladder. We tried to study patient factors affecting pre operatively, investigations predicting difficult gall bladder and worked out system predicting degree of difficulty intra operatively.

Keywords: Gall stones, difficult cholecystectomy, laparoscopy.

INTRODUCTION

Gallstone disease occurs in 3% to 20% of the population worldwide, the majority of whom remain asymptomatic. However over any 10 years period 25% of these patients go on to develop symptomatic disease and 3.5% have serious and complication. The traditional management of acute calculus cholecystitis is initially conservative, allowing later elective cholecystectomy. While the majority of patients presenting with acute cholecystitis improve with conservative treatment, more than 20% of acute cholecystitis fail to resolve and necessitate an urgent cholecystectomy. Cholecystectomy during the "index" (acute) admission with acute cholecystitis therefore offers a one - admission definitive management approach, and is recommended. There is general agreement only when advance inflammation threatens the patient's life and urgent operation is a necessity. In other form of inflammation, it is possible to make an early cholecystectomy or proceed by conservative method. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is occasionally technically demanding, many surgeons are worried about excessive bleeding and inadvertent injury. However the advantage of early cholecystectomy comprise a shorter time of treatment, lower costs of treatment because of one admission definitive treatment and a shorter period of total hospitalization. There is prevention of the development of serious complication such as empyema (mortality 10%). Another advantage is that the operation is technically relatively simple during the first week of the illness, edema making dissection of tissue planes easier. Now the advances have made difficult cases to be treated laparoscopically. At present few scoring system present to predict difficulty. We worked out one such system predicting degree of difficulty intra operatively. Risk Score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy (RSCLO) as described by Kama et al (2001).1

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

What is Difficult ?

Definition of difficult cholecystectomy is inconsistent. Factors include difficult gall bladder that would.

Scores Factors

3              Adhesions to gall bladder.

3              Perforated gall bladder.

3              Repeated attacks of cholecystitis

3              Empyema

3              Thick wall

3              Previous GI surgery.

5              Portal Hypertension.

5              Anatomical Relations and variations.

5              Mirzi'ssyndrome

 

 

Difficulty level

 

Difficult

Moderately difficult

Very difficult

Score

0-5

5-10

>10

 

Difficult gall bladder defined as any two of the factors that are carrying up technical difficulty while dissecting gall bladder. Patients were evaluated on basis of clinical signs and ultrasonography - thickness of gall bladder wall, number and size of stones, impacted stones in Harmann's pouch, pericystic fluid collection. Status of biliary tree: CBD - 1.Intrahepatic and2.Extrahepatic.Concomitant liver and pancreatic pathology. Colonic gasses.Whether colon is adhesions to gall bladder or not? Clinical signs like - abdominal pain, jaundice, dark coloured urine and gall bladder mass.


 

FACTORS AND SCORES

 

Factors

Scores

Clinical

- Obesity

3

 

- Previous GI tract surgeries

 

 

1. Upper GI tract surgeries

3

 

2. Lower GI tract surgeries

2

USG

1. Acute cholecystitis

3

 

2. Repeated attacks of cholecystitis

3

 

3. Empyema

3

 

4. Thick wall (more than 5 mm

3

 

5. Portal hypertension

3

 

6. Liver and CBD pathologies

5

Intraoperative

1. Adhesions of gall bladder

5

 

- To Omentum

2

 

- Toviscus

3

 

-To nonviscus adhesion

5

 

2. Anatomical relations and variations

3

 

3. Perforation

3

 

4. GB mass

3

 

5. Mirzi’s syndrome

5

 


OBSERVATIONS

During two year period, total of (40) forty cases of difficult gall bladder who underwent laproscopic cholecystectomy successfully, none of them converted to open cholecystectomy. In our study population most of the cases are in the age group 31-40i.e 9 cases (25%) followed by 41-50 i.e.6 cases (16.66%). In the present study female patients were more i.e. 20 cases (55.55%) than male i.e. 16 cases (44.55%) with female to male ratio 1:0.8


 

Table 3: Preoperative data of cases

Male : Female Ratio

1 :1.25

Association of Diabetes Mellitus

4

Repeated attacks of cholecystitis

4

Previous H/ O surgery

3

Previous of ERCP

10

 

Table 4: Ultrasonography findings

Parameter

No. of Cases

Percentage

Thick wall gall bladder

18

50.0%

Impacted stone in HP

6

16.66%

Liver cirrhosis

2

5.55%

Portal hypertension

1

2.77%

CBD pathology

3

8.33%

Peri gall bladder fluid collection

2

5.55%

Splenomegaly

2

5.55%

Calculus cholecystitits

15

41.66%

Gall Stone Pancreatitis

1

2.77%

Colonic gases

0

0

Colonic adhesion to gall bladder

0

0

 

Table 5: Intraoperative findings

Parameter

No. of Cases

Percentage

Thick wall gall bladder

14

38.88

Gall bladder Perforation

6

16.66

Gangrenous gall bladder

3

8.33

Gall bladderadhesions

18 +5*+10

66.66

Mirizzis Syndrome

1

2.77

Frozen Callot’s

10

27.77

Gall bladder empyema

9

25

Impacted Stone at neck

6

16.66

Intra hepatic gall bladder

3

8.33

Anatomical relation and variations

1 +1u

5.55

Extensive bleed

0

0

Cirrhosis Liver

4

11.11

Liver Abscess

1

2.77

Drain Place

3

8.33

Mucocele of gall bladder

3

8.33

Sub hepatic Appendix

1

2.77

Posteriorly placed cystic artery

3

8.33

Gall bladderadherent to right HD

1

2.77

         Duodenal Adhesion – *, Colonic Adhesion – 0, Impacted Stone in CHD –u


 

Table 6: Mean Score

USG Mean score

OT Mean score

TOTAL Mean score

7.08

12.72

20.19

 

Table 7: Sex wise Mean USG Score

USG Score

Male

Female

6.75

7.35

 

Table 9: Procedure Performed

Parameter

No. of Cases

Percentage

Lap cholecystectomy

26

72.22%

Lap subtotal cholecystectomy

4

11.11%

Lap Partial cholecystectomy

1

2.72%

Lap CBD Exploration with Lap cholecystectomy

2+1p

8.33%

Diagnostic laparoscopy

1

2.77%

Conversion to open cholecystectomy

0

0

                Lap CBD with Lap subtotal cholecystectomy – p

 

Table 10: Postoperative Complications

Parameter

No. of Cases

Percentage

Fever

2

5.55%

Pulmonary edema

1

2.77%

Billiaryleak

1

2.77%

Port site infection

2

5.55%

Faecal fistula

1

2.77%

Postoperative Jaundice

1

2.77%

 

Postoperativejaundice was developed on day 4 of surgery and treated for choledocholithiasis by ERCP.

 


DISCUSSION

Several studies has evaluated that risk factors for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy formed on basis of clinical preoperative findings, ultrasonography and perioperative findings. Schrenk preoperative and perioperative risk factors of conversion to open in 1300 pt who underwent lap cholecystectomy. They found that significant risk factors are,age>65, right hypochondriac region pain, increased gall bladder thickening of gall bladder wall,repeated episodes of cholecystitis and diabetes mellitus.2 As compared to above studies our study also shows similar observation that 4 cases (11.11%) patients were having diabetes mellitus which was associated with gangrenous gall bladder intraoperatively. Previous attack of cholecystitis in 4 cases (11.11%) patient. Alponate et al described four risk factors for difficult laproscopiccholecystectomy increased wall thickness, increased total leucocyte count and increased alkaline phosphatase level. They reported conversion were 1.5% when no risk factors and 9.3% in presence of only acute cholecystitis and 58%in all four risk factors.1,2 In comparison toAlponate et al study our study also shown similar observations that 4 cases (11.11%)patients were having attack of acute cholecystitis and it was found that there was difficulty during operative procedure due to the cholecystitis.

USG Findings

Ultrasonography (USG) is very important tool not only for diagnosis gallbladder pathology but also predicting the difficulty during surgery.3 In our study ultrasonography helps as an important tool that have helped in anticipating difficulty preoperatively and on ultrasonography ground we could plan for standard protocol management. In our study it was found that on ultrasonography thick wall gall bladder in 50% patients. Calculus cholecystitis in 41%, impacted stones in Hartmanns pouch in 16.66%, peri gallbladder collection in 5.5%, gallbladder empyma in 25% cases. In 2.7 % gall stones pancreatitis was observed. During operation it was observed that 66.6% of patients had gall bladder adhesions, gall bladder perforation in 16.66%, impacted stones in Hartmann’s pouch in 16.66%, frozen Callot’s triangle 27.77%, gallbladder empyema in 25%, cirrhosis of liver in 11.11%. Abdominal ultrasonography in our study allowed for determination of preferentially intraoperative technical difficulties and like of returning to open surgery.

Intraoperative findings

In our study intraoperative difficulties encountered were gallbladder adhesions with omentum 18 cases (66.66%), 5 cases having duodenal adhesions to gallbladder and one patient was having colonic adhesions. In our study it was found that 14 (58.88%) patients were having thick wall gallbladder which caused difficulty for retraction of gallbladder. Frozen Callot`s triangle found in 10 (27.77) patients which caused significant difficulty in dissecting cystic artery and cystic duct as it obscured anatomy. In 6 (16.66%) patients impacted stones at neck of gallbladder and resultant distended gallbladder was found. We found easy way to handle such hugely distended gallbladder by pocking up with 5mm trocar and suctioning it and remove gallbladder with stone after decompressing it by suctioning. Gallbladder empyema was found to be either due to impacted stone or due to infection in 9 (25%) patients. Gallbladder perforation is major intraoperative finding which was difficult to manage laparoscopically. Marks Shafer et al observed intraoperative complication in 24 out of 159.They were gallbladder perforation (16), bleeding (4), perforation of transverse colon and atrial fibrillation (37).4 As compared to Marks shafer et al study we found 6 cases (16.66%) perforated gallbladder, none of case having severe intraoperative bleed. we did not find atrial fibrillation or colonic perforation in a single case in our study. All these cases successfully completed laparoscopically, however few of them converted to laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy or laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy. None of them converted to open cholecystectomy.

Conversion to standard protocol or open conversion

Simpolous et al reviewed retrospectively the record of 1,804 patients who underwent cholecystectomy from May 1992 to Jan 2004. Results : conversion to open needed in 94 patients (5.2%), of which 44 (2.8%) had no inflamed and 50 (2.77%) had acute inflammation of gall bladder. They concluded that none of risk factors were contra indication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.5 This may predict the difficulty of procedure and permit surgeon to inform patients about risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure. In our study 26 (72.22%) patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy successfully but some of them 4 (11%) patients needed conversion to other standard protocol like laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy and one case (2.72%) laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic CBD exploration done in 3(8.33%) patient in our study. One patient was planned for diagnostic scopy for suspicious appendicular perforation but it was found that gall bladder was perforated. However open conversion not needed in a single case. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy and laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy helped to prevent open conversion and also avoided common bile duct injuries.

Postoperative Complications

There were no bile duct injuries or death in all the studied cases. However fever was present in 2(5.5%) patients and one patient (2.77%) developed pulmonary edema on post-operative day 2 and was managed in Intensive care unit. One (2.71%) patient underwent partial cholecystectomy developed biliary leak on post-operative day 10 and was managed by placing drain under ultrasonography guidance. One patient is having fecal fistula (2.77%) which got healed with conservative management. Obstructive jaundice was developed in one (2.77%) patients only on postoperative day 5 which was treated with ERCP. However all the complication we managed conservatively no re-exploration needed.

 

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for gall stone diseases. However some patients need conversion to standard protocol like Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy and laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy. In our study we found that in emergency cases like acute cholecystitis and gangrenous gallbladder can be safely and successfully managed by laparoscopically. Our study concluded that ultrasonography is important tool not only for diagnosis of gall bladder pathology but for anticipating difficulties preoperatively which helped to plan for intraoperative management also. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy and laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy helped to prevent open conversion and also avoided common bile duct injuries. Most important thing is surgeon’s skill. An experienced surgeon can manage all technically difficult gall bladders laparoscopically.No open surgery needed for gall bladder stones diseases. The instrument and theatre staff should be quite friendly.In our series this care all achieved and hence all laparoscopies were successful.

 

REFERENCES

    1. Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M. A risk of score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2001; 181:520-5.
    2. Bulbuller N, Ilhan YS, Baktir A, Kirkil C, Dogru O. Implementation of a scoring system for assessing difficult cholecystectomies in a single center. surgery today (2006)36-40
    3. MushtaqChalkoo, ShahanawzAhgnar, Abhamidwani, AsimLaharwal et al Laparoscopic management of difficult cholecystectomy. Advances in laparoscopic surgery.
    4. Markus Schafer, Lukas Krahenbiihl,Markus W buchler. Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J surg2001; 182,291-297.
    5. SurgEndosco. 2005 May 4;[Epub ahead of print]Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to opencholecystectomy.SimopoulosC,BotaitisS,Polychronidisa,TripsianisG,Karayiannakis AJ.
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
  Copyrights statperson consultancy www

Copyrights © MedPulse Publishing Corporation www.medpulse.in  2017. All Rights Reserved.