Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 9 Issue 1 - January 2019



 

A study of pattern of various drugs used for treatment of hypertension at tertiary health care centre

 

Preeti Dharapur1, Sandeep Patil2*

 

1Tutor, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology BRIMS, Bidar, Karnataka, INDIA.

Email: preetidharapur14@gmail.com  drsbpatil0@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: The prevalence of hypertension has been increasing in India. The average prevalence of hypertension in India is 25% in urban and 10% in rural inhabitants Aims and Objectives: To Study the pattern of various drugs used for treatment of Hypertension at tertiary health care centre. Methodology: The Present study was undertaken by the department of Pharmacology in collaboration with the department of Medicine on newly diagnosed patients of Hypertension attending Medicine outpatient department of HKE society’s Basaveshwara Teaching and General hospital, attached to M.R. Medical College, Kalaburagi a for a period of 12 months from January 2017- December 2017. The statistics presented in the percentages and tabular form. Result:The mean age in the patients received Cilnidipinewas 42.98 ± 8.35 and Amlodipine was 44.48 ± 9.03.Out of total 100 patients, Male: Female ratio of 67:33 was found in the patients enrolled for our study. Both the groups had more patients with moderate elevation of blood pressure. In Cilnidipine group majority of the patients required concomitant drugs like–ARBsi.e. 54% followed by Diuretics34% , ACIs- 26%,Antidiabetics-14% etc. andin Amlodipine group the majority of the patients required ARBs- 50%,ACIs- 34% , Statins- 20%, Antidiabetics- 20%, β blockers-16%, Diuretics- 12% etc.Conclusion:It can be concluded from our study that In Cilnidipine group majority of the patients required concomitant drugs like–ARBs, Diuretics, ACIs, AntidiabeticsandinAmlodipine groupthe majority of the patients required ARBs, ACIs, Statins, Antidiabetics,β blockers,Diuretics etc.

Key Word: Hypertension, ARBs, Diuretics, ACIs, Antidiabetic, Amlodipine, Cilnidipine

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The definition of hypertension as released by the seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood. pressure (JNC 7) is systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg, which simplifies hypertension classification by including only stage I (SBP 140–159 mm Hg or DBP 90–99) or stage II (SBP 160 mm Hg or higher or DBP 100 mm Hg or higher). Perhaps the most important change is the new classification of “pre–hypertension” (SBP 120–139 mm Hg or DBP 80–89 mm Hg), which combines the normal and high normal categories of the previous JNC VI report, in the recognition of the fact that even these levels of BP confer an increased risk of the development of hypertension and future cardiovascular events1, 2 Many risk factors may contribute to its development, including age, gender, weight, physical activity, smoking, family history, serum cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, peripheral resistance vessel tone, endothelial dysfunction, autonomic tone, insulin resistance and neurohumoral factors. Hypertension doubles the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, renal failure, and peripheral arterial disease if not effectively treated3,4. Globally, elevated blood pressure is the leading risk factor for mortality and morbidity, accounting for 7% of global disability adjusted life years and 9.4 million deaths in 20105. The prevalence of hypertension has been increasing in India. The average prevalence of hypertension in India is 25% in urban and 10% in rural inhabitants6. Factors which are attributable to these changes are rapid urbanization, lifestyle changes, dietary changes and increased life expectancy7. Epidemiological studies have shown that sedentary life-style and stress are important risk factors for hypertension8. A systematic review on the prevalence of HTN in India, for studies published between 1969 and July 2011, reported a range between 13.9 to 46.3% and 4.5 to 58.8% in urban and rural areas of India, respectively9.So we have done study to understand the pattern of drug and concomitant drugs consumed for hypertension at tertiary health care centre.

 

METHODOLOGY

The Present study was undertaken by the department of Pharmacology in collaboration with the department of Medicine on newly diagnosed patients of Hypertension attending Medicine outpatient department of HKE society’s Basaveshwara Teaching and General hospital, attached to M.R.Medical College, Kalaburagi a for a period of 12 months from January 2017- December 2017. After approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), 100 adult patients aged 18-60 yrs of either sex of newly diagnosed mild and moderate hypertensive patients were included. whilePatients aged <18 years and >60 years, History of severe hepatic, renal disease and severe cardiac disease, Pregnant and lactating mothers, Major Depressive Disorder with psychotic symptoms were excluded from the study. Here the main treatment group i.e. Cilnidipine and Amlodipine were prepared and pattern of concomitant drugs given them were also retrieved.The statistics presented in the percentages and tabular form.

 

RESULTS

The present study was conducted on 100 patients aged between 18-60 years of age of either sex, diagnosed to be suffering from mild to moderate hypertension, and prescribed either Cilnidipine or Amlodipine. The results obtained from our study have been tabulated along with appropriate graphical representation below

 

Table 1: Age wise distribution of patients among two groups

Group

Mean age (years)

Standard Deviation

Cilnidipine

42.98

8.35

Amlodipine

44.48

9.03

The mean age in the patients received Cilnidipinewas 42.98 ± 8.35 and Amlodipine was 44.48 ± 9.03.

 

Table 2: Sex wise distribution of patients among two groups

Gender

Cilnidipine

Amlodipine

Total number of cases

Male

33

34

67

Female

17

16

33

Out of total 100 patients, Male: Female ratio of 67:33 was found in the patients enrolled for our study

 

Table 3: Distribution of patients according to Grade of Hypertension

Grades

Cilnidipine (N=50)

Amlodipine (N=50)

Mild

19(38%)

23(46%)

Moderate

31(62%)

27(54%))

Both the groups had more patients with moderate elevation of blood pressure

 

Table 4: concomitantmedications prescribed in patients of two group

Drugs

Cilnidipine group (N=50)

Amlodipine group (N=50)

Diuretics

17 (34%)

6 (12%)

Central Sympatholytic

Agents

4 (8%)

4 (8%)


Central Sympatholytic

Agents

4 (8%)

4 (8%)

α blockers

4 (8%)

5 (10%)

β blockers

7 (14%)

8 (16%)

ACIs

13 (26%)

17 (34%)

ARBs

27 (54%)

25 (50%)

Statins

4 (8%)

10 (20%)

Antidiabetics

7 (14%)

10 (20%)

Others

4 (8%)

1 (2%)

Cilnidipine group majority of the patients required concomitant drugs like–ARBsi.e. 54% followed by Diuretics34% , ACIs- 26%,Antidiabetics-14% etc. andin Amlodipine group the majority of the patients required ARBs- 50%,ACIs- 34% , Statins- 20%, Antidiabetics- 20%, β blockers-16%, Diuretics- 12% etc.

 

Figure 1: concomitant medications prescribed in patients of two groups

 

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of hypertension among younger individuals, however, is on a steady rise. This may be attributed to several factors such as dramatic changes in lifestyle and stress patterns, improved detection rates due to better screening and a high prevalence of metabolic and dietetic coronary risk factors among adolescents of the middle- and upper-middle class10. The alarming trend of an increasing prevalence of overweight/obesity, under nutrition, and hypertension is observed among indigenous populations of India, emphasizing the incorporation of a specific health management policy11. Blood pressure is the pressure of the blood against the inner walls of the blood vessels, especially of the arteries during different phases of contraction of the heart. Arterial BP is directly proportional to the product of cardiac output (CO) and resistance to passage of blood through pre-capillary arterioles (peripheral vascular resistance, PVR)12. Pharmaceutical management is started when dietary and life modifications efforts are failed to lower the BPOur study depicts that patients were also segregated based on the grade of hypertension. It was observed that 31(62%) and 27(54%) patients in Cilnidipine and Amlodipine group respectively had maximum patients with moderate hypertension. A study by Waeber B13 and Kjeldsen SE et al14 showed that combination of different antihypertensive bas beneficial in the treatment of hypertension, likewise our study deals with the Concomitant medications prescribed in patients of two groups. ARBs 27 (54%) in Cilnidipine group and 25 (50%) Amlodipine group is the most common concomitant drug prescribed in both groups.

 

CONCLUSION

it can be concluded from our study that In Cilnidipine group majority of the patients required concomitant drugs like–ARBs, Diuretics, ACIs, AntidiabeticsandinAmlodipine groupthe majority of the patients required ARBs, ACIs, Statins, Antidiabetics,β blockers,Diuretics etc.

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

  1. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D. Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in non–hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: A cohort study.Lancet 2001;358:1682–6.
  2. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Evans JC, O’Donnell CJ, Kannel WB,et al. Impact of high–normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1291–7.
  3. Walker R, Whittlesea C. Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. Fifth edition,Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. 2012.
  4. Walker BR, Colledge NR, Ralston SH, Penman ID. Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine. Twenty second edition, Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier, Edinburgh, United States of America. 2014.
  5. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380: 2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)61766-8.
  6. GuptaR. Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. Journal of Human Hypertension 2004; 18:73–78
  7. PradeepaR, Mohan V. Hypertension and prehypertension in developing countries. Indian J Med Res December 2008; 128: 688-690
  8. Harmony for Silvers Foundation. Ageing in India in the 21st century:A research agenda. Mumbai: Silver Word: Research Division-Monograph I; 2006. p. 1-20.)
  9.  Devi P, et al.Prevalence, risk factors and awareness of hypertension in India: a systematic review. J Hum Hypertens 2013; 27:281–287
  10. Gupta R, Goyle A, Kashyap S, Agarwal M, Consul R, Jain BK. Prevalence of atherosclerosis risk factors in adolescent school children.Indian Heart J. 1998 Sep-Oct;50(5):511-5
  11. Kshatriya GK, Acharya SK. Triple Burden of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk among Indian Tribes. PloS one. 2016 Jan 25;11(1)
  12. Benowitz LN. Antihypertensive Agents. In: Katzung GB, Master BS, Trevor JA, editor. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 12th ed. New York. Mc Gwan Hill; 2012; P. 169-92
  13. Waeber B. Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists and diuretics in hypertension. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2003 May 1; 1(1):43-50.
  14. Kjeldsen SE et al. Fixed-dose combinations in the management of hypertension. American journal of cardiovascular drugs. 2005 Jan 1; 5 (1):17- 22.