A  comparative study of autonomic status in hypothyroid and euthyroid subjects
           
          
            Leena  Hiremath1, Anitha Lakshmi2*
             
            1Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology,  K.S.Hegde Medical Academy, KSHEMA, Deralakatte.
            2Associate Professor, Department of Physiology,  BLCMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.
            Email: leenabobbi2014@gmail.com,anithalakshmi1612@gmail.com 
           
           
          Abstract               Background and Objective: Thyroid hormones have a profound effect on every tissue in the body. The  cardiovascular system is one of the most important targets of thyroid hormone  affecting either directly or indirectly which may be due to changes at the  autonomic nervous system level. Hence hypothyroidism is associated with changes  not only in cardiac and vascular function but is also believed to alter the  autonomic regulation of heart. Though most of the time the complications  related to autonomic dysfunction remains unnoticed, it is possible to prevent  the development of various complications related to autonomic dysfunction by  early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore the present study was undertaken to  assess the autonomic status in newly detected hypothyroid female patients  (cases) and euthyroids (controls) and compare the autonomic status between  hypothyroid patients and euthyroids. Methods: 30 newly detected cases of  hypothyroid female patients between the age group of 20-50years were selected  from SDM College of Medical Science and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad.30 age and  sex matched individuals who are euthyroids were taken as controls. Height,  weight and body mass index were recorded. Pulse rate, blood pressure and  corrected QT interval were recorded in a resting condition. Cardiovascular  autonomic function was studied by testing the sympathetic activity (Blood  pressure response to immediate standing, cold pressor test, and sustained  handgrip exercise) and parasympathetic activity (Heart rate variation at rest,  during deep breathing and during Valsalva manoeuvre). Result: Result  were analyzed by unpaired ‘t’ test. In hypothyroid patients the BMI was significantly  high. In there sting condition, the heart rate was significantly decreased,  diastolic blood pressure was increased, and QT interval was normal. When tested  for the sympathetic activity, Blood pressure response to immediate standing and  cold pressure test did not show any significant difference when compared with  euthyroids. Sustained handgrip test showed significant change in the diastolic  blood pressure. Test reflecting the parasympathetic activity that is, heart  rate variability (HRV) at rest showed significant smaller HF(MS2) values,  higher LF (n.u) values and higher values of LF/HF ratio. Whereas the heart rate  response to deep breathing and valsalvamanuovre did not show any significant changes. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that the autonomic  status in hypothyroid patient is altered, and there is increased sympathetic  activity and decreased parasympathetic activity.
          Key Words:  Hypothyroidism, cardiovascular system, Sympathetic activity, Parasympathetic  activity, sympathovagal balance. 
           
          INTRODUCTION
          Hypothyroidism  is the most common clinical endocrine disorder of thyroid function, which is  due to decrease in the synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormone thyroxine (T4  ) and triidothyronine (T3 ).1 99% of hypothyroidism cases are due to  primary hypothyroidism, which may be caused by an abnormality in the thyroid  gland itself and 1% of the cases are due to secondary and tertiary or central  hypothyroidism, which may result from pituitary or hypothalamicdiseases.2 Though the studies done in Indian population have assessed the autonomic status  in thyroid dysfunction, but very less data is available on the changes in  autonomic functions affecting cardiovascular system. Hence the present study  was undertaken to assess the autonomic status in newly detected hypothyroid  female patients attending SDM medical college, Sattur, Dharwad during the  period, December 2010 to November 2011.
           
          AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
          
            - To  study the autonomic status of cardiovascular system in newly diagnosed  hypothyroid patients(Cases).
- To  study the autonomic status of cardiovascular system in euthyroid (Controls)
- To  compare the autonomic status between hypothyroid patients and euthyroids (Cases  andcontrols).
 
          METHODOLOGY
          The study was conducted in the  laboratory set up of department of Physiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences  and Hospital, Dharwar from December 2010 to November 2011.
          Source of data:
          Newly detected cases of  hypothyroidism were taken from out patient department (OPD) of medicine, SDM  College of Medical Sciences And Hospital, Sattur,Dharwad. Age and sex matched  controls (euthyroids) were randomly selected from the same institution.
          Method of collection of data:
          30 newly detected cases of  hypothyroid female patients between the age group of 20- 50 years, diagnosed on  the basis of general history, clinical examination and by serum levels of FT3,  FT4, and TSH were selected. 30 age and sex matched controls that were diagnosed  as euthyroids on the basis of general history and clinical examination were  randomly selected. Informed written consent for the conduction of study was  obtained from hypothyroid patients and healthy controls after the detailed  procedure and purpose of the study was explained to them. Institutional Ethical  committee approval for the study was obtained. The subjects were categorized  into two groups.
          Group І - Newly detected case of  hypothyroidism, with serum thyroid hormone level47 FT3        < 1.4 pg/ml.
          FT4         < 0.8 ng /dl TSH                 >5.6μIu/ml
          Group І І- Normal healthy  controls
          INCLUSION CRITERIA:
          -Newly detected hypothyroid  patients.
          -Female patients with age group  of 20-50 years.
          EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
          -Previously diagnosed case of  hypothyroidism and who are on treatment
          -Persons with a history of  diseases which are known to affect autonomic functions for example diabetes  mellitus, renal diseases, psychiatric disease, electrolyte imbalance,  cardiovascular diseases, central and peripheral nervous system diseases, anemia  and pregnancy.
          -History of acute / chronic  infections.
          Investigations: Cases of  hypothyroidism were selected based on the estimations of serum FT3, FT4 and TSH  levels in the hospital laboratory of biochemistry department. Estimations of  serum FT3, FT4 and TSH levels were done by Acculite CLIA  Microwellschemiluminesce Immunoassay manufactured by Monobind INC.U.S.A.
          Methods of assessment of  cardiovascular autonomic function tests
          The following Six established  autonomic functions tests were performed .Results of the tests were expressed  as ratios and differences which have been accepted by Ewing and Clarke.
          Test for sympathetic activity or  (sympathetic function tests)
          
            - Blood  pressure response to immediatestanding
- Blood  pressure response to Cold pressortest
- Blood  pressure response to sustained hand gripexercise
Test for parasympathetic activity  or (parasympathetic function tests)
          
            - Heart  rate variation during deepbreathing
- Heart  rate response during Valsalvamanoeuvre
- Heart  rate variability by power spectral analysis (PSA) at rest.
          
           
          RESULTS
          Mean and standard deviation (SD)  values were evaluated for all measured parameters. The significance of  difference in the mean value was analyzed using unpaired “t‟ test.
          Age and Body mass index (BMI)
        
        Table 4: Mean and SD of Age and BMI by study groups (cases  and controls)
        
          
            
              | Parameter | Cases Mean    ± SD | Controls Mean    ± SD | „t‟value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
            
              | Age (yrs) | 36.43±8.51  | 36.43±8.51  | 0.00  | 1.00  | NS  | 
            
              | BMI (kg/m2) | 26.49±5.48  | 20.61±3.02  | t=5.15  | <0.05  | S  | 
          
         
        *p<0.05
        The mean and SD of age of study  samples in cases (36.43±8.51) and control (36.43±8.51) groups are similar  (t=0.00, p=1.00). A significant difference is observed between cases and  controls with respect to BMI scores (t=5.15, p<0.05). The cases (26.49±5.48)  have significantly higher BMI scores as compared to controls.
         
        Table 5: Mean and SD scores of thyroid profiles (FT3pg/ml,  FT4 ng/dl and TSH μIU/ml) in cases
        
          
            
              | Thyroid    profiles | Mean | SD | 
            
              | FT3pg/ml  | 1.72  | 0.71  | 
            
              | FT4 ng/dl  | 0.66  | 0.36  | 
            
              | TSHμIU/ml  | 31.67  | 21.89  | 
          
         
        Results  of the above table present the Mean and SD scores of thyroid profiles  (FT3pg/ml, FT4 ng/dl and TSH μIU/ml) in cases.
         
        
          Table  6: Comparison of cases and controls  with respect to pulse scores, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and  DBP)
         
        
          
            
              | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
            
              | Pulse    rate (bpm) | 71.50±5.86  | 75.30±7.29  | t=-2.22  | <0.05  | S  | 
            
              | SBP (mm Hg) | 126.13±21.19  | 118.53±11.86  | t=1.71  | >0.05  | NS  | 
            
              | DBP (mm Hg) | 81.73±12.21  | 76.47±6.72  | t=2.07  | <0.05  | S  | 
          
         
        *p<0.05
        A significant  difference is observed between cases and controls with respect to pulse scores  (t=-2.22, p<0.05). The cases (71.50±5.86) have significant smaller pulse  scores as compared to controls (75.30±7.29). A non-significant difference is  observed between cases and controls with respect to Systolic BP scores (t=1.71,  p>0.05). The cases (126.13±21.19) and controls (118.53±11.86) have similar  Systolic BP scores. A significant difference is observed between cases and  controls with respect to Diastolic BP (mm /Hg) scores (t=2.0694, p<0.05).  The cases (81.73±12.21) have significant higher Diastolic BP (mm /Hg) scores as  compared to controls (76.47±6.72Corrected QT interval (QTC).
         
        Table 7: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to  QTc scores
        
          
            
              | Parameter | Cases Mean ± SD | Control Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
            
              | QTC  | 400.20±68.68  | 381.53±15.97  | t=1.45  | >0.05  | NS  | 
          
         
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to QTC scores (t=1.45, p>0.05). The cases (400.20±68.68) and controls  (381.53±15.97) have similar QTC scores.
        
      Table 8: Comparison of cases and controls with  respect to Systolic and Diastolic BP (SBP andDBP) during immediate standing (mm  /Hg).
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | SBP  (mmHg) during immediate standing  | 117.87±20.45  | 111.67±12.51  | t=1.42  | >0.05  | NS  | 
          
            | DBP(mm    Hg)during immediate standing  | 78.07±12.35  | 73.87±6.08  | t=1.67  | >0.05  | NS  | 
        
       
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to Systolic BP on immediate standing (mm /Hg) scores (t=1.42, p>0.05).The  cases (117.87±20.45) and controls (111.67±12.51) have similar Systolic BP  scores on immediate standing (mm/Hg). A non-significant difference is observed  between cases and controls with respect to diastolic BP on immediate standing  (mm /Hg) scores (t=1.67, p>0.05).The cases (78.07±12.35) and controls  (73.87±6.08) have similar diastolic BP scores on immediate standing (mm/Hg).
       
      Table 9: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to  Systolic and diastolic B (SBPandDBP) during Cold pressor test (mm /Hg)
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | ControlsMean    ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | SBP  (mmHg)    during cold pressor test  | 129.73±20.75  | 126.93±10.32  | t=0.66  | >0.05  | NS  | 
          
            | DBP    (mm Hg) during cold pressor test  | 82.40±10.70  | 81.73±6.58  | t=0.29  | >0.05  | NS  | 
        
       
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to Systolic BP on Cold pressor test (mm /Hg) scores (t=0.66, p>0.05).The  cases (129.73±20.75) and controls (126.93±10.32) have similar Systolic BP  scores on Cold pressor test (mm/Hg). A non-significant difference is observed  between cases and controls with respect to diastolic BP on Cold pressor test  (mm /Hg) scores (t=0.29, p>0.05). The cases (82.40±10.70) and controls  (81.73±6.58) have similar diastolic BP scores on Cold pressor test (mm /Hg).
       
      Table 10: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to  Systolic and diastolic BP (SBPandDBP) during Handgrip test (mm /Hg)
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | SBP  (mm      Hg)    during hand                 grip test  | 138.60±19.12  | 134.00±9.14  | t=1.19  | >0.05  | NS  | 
          
            | DBP  (mm      Hg)    during hand                 grip  test  | 90.53±9.58  | 85.33±6.27  | t=2.49  | <0.05  | S  | 
        
       
      *p<0.05
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to Systolic BP on Handgrip test (mm /Hg) scores (t=1.19, p>0.05). The cases  (138.60±19.12) and controls (134.00±9.14) have similar Systolic BP scores on  Handgrip test (mm /Hg). A significant difference is observed between cases and  controls with respect to diastolic BP on Handgrip test (mm /Hg) scores (t=2.49,  p<0.05). The cases (90.53±9.58) have significant higher diastolic BP on  Handgrip test (mm /Hg) scores as compared to controls (85.33±6.27).
      
      Table 11: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to  heart rate (HR) variation during deep breathing
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | HR    (bpm) variation during deep breathing  | 27.17±8.60  | 24.30±6.14  | t=1.49  | >0.05  | NS  | 
        
       
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to HRV during deep breathing (Beats /min) scores (t=1.49, p>0.05). It means  that, the cases (27.17±8.60) and controls (24.30±6.14) have similar HRV during deep  breathing (Beats /min).
       
      Table 12: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to  Heart rate response during Valsavamanoeuvre (Valsalva Ratio)
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | HR (bpm) Response during Valsalva manoeuvre (valsalva ratio)  | 1.42±0.26  | 1.48±0.16  | t=-1.16  | >0.05  | NS  | 
        
       
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to HRV during Valsavamanoeuvre (Valsalva Ratio) scores (t=-1.16, p>0.05).  The cases (1.42±0.26) and controls (1.48±0.16) have similar HRV during  Valsavamanoeuvre (Valsalva Ratio).
       
      Table 13: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to LF  (ms2) and HF (ms2) scores in HRV during rest
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟value | Significance | 
          
            | LF(ms2)  (HRV    by PSA at rest)  | 268.93±204.29  | 313.33±195.55  | t=1.19  | >0.05  | NS  | 
          
            | HF(ms2)  (HRV    by PSA at rest)  | 262.67±197.62  | 495.37±327.07  | t=-3.34  | <0.05  | S  | 
        
       
      *p<0.05
      A  non-significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect  to LF (ms2) scores (t=1.19, p>0.05). The cases (268.93±204.29) and controls  (313.33±195.55) have similar LF (ms2) scores. A significant difference is  observed between cases and controls with respect to HF (ms2) scores (t=-3.34,  p<0.05). The cases (262.67±197.62) have significant smaller HF (ms2) scores  as compared to controls (495.37±327.07).
       
      Table 14: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to LF  (n.u), HF (n.u) scores in HRV during rest
      
        
          | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
        
          | LF(n.u)  (HRV    by PSA at rest)  | 51.42±13.65  | 42.49±16.33  | t=2.30  | <0.05  | S  | 
        
          | HF(n.u)  (HRV    by PSA at rest)  | 48.19±13.58  | 53.81±16.61  | t=1.43  | >0.05  | NS  | 
      
      *p<0.05
      A  significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect to  LF (n.u) scores (t=2.30, p<0.05). The cases (51.42±13.65) have significant  higher LF (n.u) scores as compared to controls (42.49±16.33). A non-significant  difference is observed between cases and controls with respect to HF(n.u)  scores (t=1.43, p>0.05). The cases (48.19±13.58) and controls (53.81±16.61)  have similar LF (n.u) scores.
       
      
      Table 15: Comparison of cases and controls with respect to LF/HF ratio scores in  HRV during rest
      
        
          
            | Parameter | Cases    Mean ± SD | Controls    Mean ± SD | „t‟ value  | „p‟ value  | Significance | 
          
            | LF/HF  ratio    (HRV by PSA at rest)  | 1.25±0.72  | 0.80±0.48  | t=2.85  | <0.05  | S  | 
        
       
      *p<0.05
      A  significant difference is observed between cases and controls with respect to  LF/HF scores (t=2.85, p<0.05). The cases (1.25±0.72) have significant higher  LF/HF scores as compared to controls (0.80±0.48).
       
      
      
      DISCUSSION
      Thyroid hormones are the major  regulators of the metabolism which in turn has a direct impact on autonomic  nervous system. Affection of cardiovascular system is one of the most frequent  and most serious clinical manifestations of thyroid dysfunctions. The autonomic  nervous system maintains the internal physiological homeostasis. Any  abnormalities in the autonomic function results in diverse clinical  manifestations. The assessment of autonomic functions is an important part of  the evaluation of peripheral and central nervous system. A number of autonomic  function tests are considered reliable, noninvasive, reproducible, simple and  quick to carry out. With this background information, the autonomic functions  in hypothyroidism mainly affecting the cardiovascular system are discussed as  below:
      Since age and sex of cases and  controls were matched, age and sex related differences in autonomic tests were  avoided. Body mass index: In our study, the cases have statistically  significant higher BMI scores as compared to controls. Karthik et al,  also recorded similar results in hypothyroid subjects. According to them,  Obesity in hypothyroidism is not a pure increase in adiposity as increase in  body weight, in thyroid deficiency is mostly due to accumulation of water and  mucopolysaccharides in subcutaneous tissues.24               
      Resting pulse rate: Our study  shows that, the cases have significant smaller pulse scores as compared to  controls. The study is similar to R.Poliker, A.G. Burger et al. Decreased  HR is one of the important features of hypothyroidism. In hypothyroidism  decreased thyroid hormone decreases the direct chronotropic effect on S.A node  and heart, which is attributed to decreased β adrenergic receptor density  sensitivity and also due to cardiac chronotropic response to adrenergic  stimulation despite evidence of sympathetic over activity. It has also been  suggested that decreased binding of catecholamines with β receptors in cardiac  myocytes might be responsible for cardiovascular changes in Hypothyroids.  Several investigators suggested that though plasma catecholamines are increased  in hypothyroidism but overall depression of adrenergic responses at cardiac and  peripheral level indicates desensitization both at the receptor or post  receptorsite.12
      Resting blood pressure: Statistically a significant difference is observed between cases and controls  with respect to Diastolic BP scores in our study, which shows that, the cases  have significant higher Diastolic BP scores as compared to controls.Bhat et  al, recorded similar readings. 20 -40% of patients with hypothyroidism have  hypertension. Diastolic pressure is increased more than the systolic blood  pressure. Normally the thyroid hormone decreases the systemic vascular  resistance, maintains the blood volume and smooth muscle relaxation of  arterioles. In hypothyroidism the increase in diastolic blood pressure is due  to increase in systemic vascular resistance, low blood volume and constriction  ofarterioles.21.Corrected QT interval (QTc): In our study, the  recording of QT interval did not show any significant change in hypothyroid  patients. But Galetta et al. recorded the prolonged QT interval in overt  hypothyroidism. Experimental evidence suggests that thyroid hormones may  selectively prevent the induction of fibrosis, by the inhibition of collagen  type 1 synthesis and maintain the ventricular repolarization (QTinterval).  Prolonged QT interval is considered to be one of the risk factors for  developing arrhythmias. Contradictory findings in our study may be explained on  the basis of duration of hypothyroidism.22
      Autonomic function tests
      Sympathetic tests
      Blood pressure on immediate  standing
      Statistically the difference  observed in Systolic and diastolic blood pressure on immediate standing between  the two groups is not significant. Bhat et al. recorded the similar  results. The maintenance of an adequate upright blood pressure on immediate  standing from lying down position requires a normal baroreceptor mediated  feedback loop and an intact sympathetic nervous system. The result of our study  may indicate the intact baroreflex function with stress and intact sympathetic  nervoussystem.21
      Cold pressor test
      Our study result is similar to  Sushil kumar et al. In hypothyroidism there is altered response to β  adrenergic receptor. The Nor- adrenaline has more action on α receptors than  that on β adrenergic receptor. Due to decreased β adrenergic receptor density  and sensitivity there is less stimulation of β adrenergic receptor and less  change in heart rate and force of contraction. The test lacks sensitivity  because many normal subjects do not have a significant rise of blood pressure  on coldimmersion.26
      Sustained Handgrip test
      The result of our study result is  similar to Sushil kumar et al. The result can be explained as follows.  In hypothyroidism decreased thyroid hormone decreases the direct chronotopic  effect on S.A node and heart leading to bradycardia and decreased myocardial  contractility, which is attributed to decreased β adrenergic receptor density  and sensitivity. Even though there is increased sympathetic stimulation, there  is less effect on β adrenergic receptor and less change in heart rate and force  of contraction.26 Sympathetic stimulation liberates Nor-adrenaline,  which has more action on α receptors than that of β adrenergic receptor. In  hypothyroidism direct stimulation of VMC lead to release of Nor-Adrenaline at  the sympathetic nerve endings, which stimulates α receptors. This in turn  increases systemic vascular resistance, aortic stiffness hence the diastolic  blood pressure.
      Parasympathetic tests
      Heart rate response to deep  breathing
      In our study, non-significant  difference is observed between cases and controls with respect to HRV during  deep breathing, which is similar to Inkui et.al. Sinus arrhythmia consists of a  variation in the heart rate with an increase heart rate during inspiration and  decrease heart rate during expiration. It is a normal phenomenon and is due to  fluctuation in the parasympathetic outflow to the heart rate. Hence the above  result shows that the efferent parasympathetic or vagal (tone) activity is  unaffected.11 Heart rate response during Valsalva manoeuvre  (valsalvaratio ) A non-significant difference observed between cases and  controls with respect to HRV during Valsavamanuovre (Valsalva Ratio) is similar  to the results recorded by Bhat et al. 21 Valsalva manoeuvre  reflects the changes in heart rate and blood pressure secondary to changes in  intrathoracic pressure. These reflex changes are mediated through the baroreceptor  of aortic arch and carotid sinus. The reflex pathway includes both  parasympathetic and sympathetic fibres. Hence our study results show that the  baroreflex function mediated via the parasympathetic activity is unaltered.
      Heart rate variability by power  spectral analysis at rest
      Our study result is similar to  Ahmed et al.Two major components of spectral band, HF Power and HF norm  reflect the parasympathetic activity where as LF Power and LF norm reflect  sympathetic activity on heart. LF/HF ratio is considered as a marker of  sympathovagal balance. In our study Lower values of HF power (ms2) indicate  their reduced vagal modulation of heart. Higher values of LF norm (n.u) in  cases indicate increased sympathetic activity. Increased LF/HF ratio shows altered  sympathovagal balance. So over all there is reduced parasympathetic and  increased sympathetic activity. The site of action for thyroid hormone is also  likely to be in the central nervous system for reducing the vagal tone, as the  iodothyronine compounds have been isolated from various parts of nervous system  including hypothalamus and medulla. Increase in sympathetic activity may be due  to TRH which directly stimulate sympathetic outflow within the central  nervoussystem.25
      CONCLUSION
      The following conclusions were  drawn based on the analysis of results:
      Body mass index (BMI) was  significantly increased in hypothyroid patients, is mostly due to accumulation  of water and mucopolysaccharides in subcutaneous tissues. In hypothyroid  patients during the resting condition, the pulse rate was significantly  decreased may be due to decreased direct effect of thyroidhormone on S.A node  and heart. Significant increase in Diastolic blood pressure may be due to  increased systemic vascular resistance and normal QT interval indicates less  risk for cardiacarrhythmias. With respect to the alteration in autonomic  functions, according to our study both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity  is affected in hypothyroidism. But alteration in the sympathetic activity is more  evident by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability (LF n.u and LF/HF  ratio) than that of other tests such as cold pressor test and blood pressure  response on immediate standing. Similarly, alteration in the parasympathetic  activity is more evident by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability  (HF ms2) than that of other tests such as heart variation during deep breathing  and Valsalvamanoeuvre. We conclude that the autonomic status in hypothyroidism  is altered; there is increased sympathetic activity and decreased  parasympathetic activity. Power Spectral Analysis of HRV was more sensitive  than conventional autonomic function tests in assessing autonomic dysfunction.
       
      LIMITATION OF THE  STUDY
      
        - Wide  range of age group, which may influence autonomic function
- The  sample size is small
- Lipid  profile is not done incases
- Euthyroid  status in controls is not supported by laboratory investigation.
 
      SCOPE OF THE STUDY
      
        - In  future the study can be continued on larger number of subjects
- To  know the reversibility of autonomic function the same study can be repeated  after the correction of hypothyroidism.
 
      REFERENCES
      
      
        
          - Braverman  LE, Utiger RD. Introduction to hypothyroidism. Werner and Ingbars the thyroid  fundamental and clinical text.9th ed. Lippincott williams and  wilkinspublication.2005;p.697.
- Shah  SN. API text book of medicine .8th ed. Associations of physicians of India,  Mumbai.vol2.2008;p.1007.
- Degroot  LJ, Jameson JL.Endocrinology.4th ed. W.B Saunders Company. Vol 2.2001;p.268.
- Boelaert  k, Franklin JA. Thyroid hormone in health and disease.  JEndocrinol.2005;187(1):1-15.
- Roberts CG, Landenson  PW.Hypothyroidism.Lancet.2004;363:793-803.
- Kerber  RE, Sherman B. Echocardiographic evaluation of pericardial effusion inmyxoedema.  Circulation. 1975;52:823-7.
- Wayne  EJ. Clinical and metabolic studies in thyroid disease. Br Heart J.1960;78-85.
- Murray  JF, Kelly JJ, Brooklyn NY. The relation of thyroid hormone level to epinephrine  response, a diagnostic test for hyperthyroidism. Ann Intern Med.1959;51:309.
- Levey  GS. Catecholamine sensitivity thyroid hormone and the heart.AM J  Med.1971;50:413-9.
- Columbe  P, Dussault JH, Walker P. Plasma catecholamine concentration in hyperthyroidism  andhypothyroidism.Metabolism.1976;25(9):973-8.
- Inkuai T, Kobayashi I, Kobayashi T,  Ishii A, Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Parasympathetic nervous system activity in hypothyroidism  determined by R-R interval variations on electrocardiogram. J  InternMed.1990;228(5):431-4.
- R  Polikar, AG Burger, UScherrer , P Nicod .The thyroid and theheart. Circulation  .1993;87:1435–41.
- McAllister,  M Richard, D Michael, Laughlin, Harold M. Thyroid status and exercise  tolerance, cardiovascular and metabolic considerations. Sports  Med.1995;20(3):189-98.
- Fadel  BM, Ellahham S, Ringel MD, Lindsay J, Wartofsky L , Burman KD. Hypothyroid  heart disease. Clin.Cardiol.2000;23:402-8.
- Caccitori V, Gemma ML, Bellavere F,  Castello R, De Gregori ME, Zoppini G, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart  rate in hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol.2000;143(3):327-33.
- Foley  M, Hasser EM. Thyroid status influences baroreflex function and autonomic  contributions to arterial pressure and heart rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ  Physiol.2001;280:2061-8.
- Xing  H, Shen Y, Chen H, Wang Y, Shen W. Heart Rate Variability And Its Response to  thyroxine replacement therapy in patient with hypothyroidism. Clin Med  J.2001;114:906-8.
- Klein  I, Ojamaa K. Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. N Engl J  Med2001;344:501–509.
- Gautam  S, Tandon OP, Awashi R, Sekhri T, Sircar SS. Correlation of autonomic indices  with thyroid status. Indian J PhysiolPharmacol.2003;47(2):164-70.
- Fazio  S, Palmieri E A, Lombardi G, Biondi B. Effects of thyroid hormone on the  cardiovascular system, recent progress in hormone research.2004;59:31- 50.