Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content - Volume 7 Issue 2 - August 2018


 

 

 

Association between television viewing and risk of metabolic syndrome, a community based study

 

V Shobha Rani1, S Usha Devi2*

 

1Associate Professor, 2Professor and HOD, Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

Email: shobha_niranjan@rediffmail.com

 

Abstract               Background: Metabolic syndrome, a constellation of interconnected physiological, biochemical, clinical, and metabolic factors that directly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus is becoming an important issue during recent decades and many studies have explored the risk factors contributing to its development. However, less attention has been paid to the risk associated with sedentary behavior, especially television viewing. This study examined the association between TV viewing and risk of developing metabolic syndrome. Materials and Methods: This is a community based cross sectional study done among the 54 urban city dwellers of Anantapur within 2km from medical college. Study was conducted from July 2017 to December 2017. Data was collected using predesigned questionnaire and it was entered and analyzed in MS excel using Chi-square test considering p value <0.05 as significant. Results: Overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome among study subjects was 51.85%, with 46.42% in males and 57.69% in females .Obesity, high intake of junk food, smoking, TV viewing for longer time were found to be associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Conclusion: Increased TV viewing time was associated with an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, while physical activity was associated with a reduced prevalence. Population strategies addressing the metabolic syndrome should focus on reducing sedentary behaviours such as TV viewing, as well as increasing physical activity.

Key Word: metabolic syndrome, obesity, physical activity, TV viewing.

 

INTRODUCTION

There is an increase in the worldwide prevalence of metabolic syndrome, with the rate in each country depending on the particular diagnostic definition and the ethnicity of the population. In India and other South Asian countries, prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome is rapidly increasing leading to increased mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus1,2. Approximately about one third of urban South Asians have evidence of the metabolic syndrome3. Moreover, insulin resistance was observed to be there in nearly 30% of Asian Indian children and adolescents and many exhibit features of metabolic syndrome 4. Since metabolic syndrome and obesity track into adulthood, these clinical entities need to be recognized early in the life-course for effective prevention of T2DM and CVD. As a result of metabolic syndrome becoming an important issue during recent decades, many studies have explored the risk factors contributing to its development. Although the syndrome has often been found to be associated with Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors5-10, less attention has been paid to the risk associated with sedentary behavior, especially television (TV) viewing, that has been reported to increase the risk of obesity and coronary heart disease (CHD)11-17.A few epidemiological studies have examined the effect of TV viewing on the chances of having metabolic syndrome and found that a prolonged viewing time of at least 2 hours per day was responsible for increasing the risk of having metabolic syndrome 1.74–3.30-fold18-21. However, all these studies were conducted on Caucasian populations, and it may be that Asian populations have different risk factors for metabolic syndrome. Therefore, in our study, we examined the association between TV viewing time and the presence of metabolic syndrome.

 

METHODOLOGY

This present cross sectional study was done among urban dwellers of Anantapur from July 2017 to December 2017. Convenient sampling was followed and a sample of 54 was taken from 9 electoral wards, 6 from each ward within 2km from medical college.

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age group of 20- 80 years
  2. Those who have given informed consent for blood investigations and physical examination

 Exclusion criteria:

  1. Pregnant women
  2. Individuals on medication for hypertension, diabetes and those taking lipid lowering drugs
  3. Individuals on weight reduction programme.

Detailed interviews were performed through a predesigned questionnaire. The questionnaire required participants to provide socio-demographic characteristics and lifestyle details, such as smoking, drinking, leisure activity, and time spent on watching TV every week. After checking for completeness of data, the responses were entered in MS Excel 2007 and subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The association between TV viewing and metabolic syndrome was analyzed by using Chi-square test, P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Metabolic syndrome definition: Various diagnostic criteria have been proposed by numerous national/international organizations for defining metabolic syndrome22-25. We have followed most recent definition from Joint Interim Statement26 .of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity and also a Consensus Statement for Diagnosis of Obesity, Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome for Asian Indians 27.As per these consensus statements, three out of five cardiovascular risk factors have to be abnormal for the identification of the metabolic syndrome 26,27.

Presence of any three of the following five conditions is essential, i.e.

  1. Increased waist circumference (males: ≥90 cm and for females: ≥80 cm),
  2.  hypertriglyceredimia ≥150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/l),
  3. low HDL (Males <40 mg/dl (1 mmol/l) and for females <50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l),
  4. elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg or drug treatment for hypertension), and
  5. elevated blood sugar (fasting blood sugar ≥100 mg/ dl (5.6 mmol/l) or drug treatment for diabetes mellitus) 26,27.

Physiologically normal range of parameters:

Waist circumference: males - <102cm; females - < 80cm Hyper triglycerides: < 150 mg/dl HDL: males- >40mg; females - >50 mg Blood pressure:120/80 mg Fasting blood sugar : 70-110mg/dl
RESULTS

Sociodemographic profile: Out of 54 study subjects, majority of them were in the group of 31-40y (33.33%) followed by 51-60y (22.22%),41-50y (20.37%), 61-70y(11.11%) , 20-30y( 7.4%) and >70(5.56%)(Table 1) Among the study participants majority were males (51.85%) while females were of 48.15%.Out of 54 study participants, most of them were from above poverty line (88.89%)

 

Table1. Sociodemographic profile of study participants

Variable

 

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Age

20- 30

4

7.41

31-40

18

33.33

41-50

11

20.37

51-60

12

22.22

61-70

6

11.11

>70

3

5.56

Sex

Male

28

51.85

Female

26

48.15

Socioeconomic status

APL

48

88.89

BPL

6

11.11

 

Table 2: Distribution of study participants based on BMI

BMI

Males (n=28)

N (%)

Females(n=26)

N (%)

<18.5

0

1(3.85)

18.5 -24.99

13(46.43)

16(61.54)

>25

15(53.57)

9(34.61)

Among the study participants, majority of males (46.43%) were of overweight while BMI of most (61.54%) of females fall in normal range.

Association between TV viewing and Sociodemographic characters: From the below table (Table 2) it can be known that significant association was found between age and TV viewing (P<0.05) i.e. T.V viewing was high among the age groups of 20-40 and 40-60 compared to those above 60 .Also significant association was found between TV viewing and junk food intake, T.V viewing and physical activity i.e. high intake of junk food and low physical activity was associated with longer duration of TV viewing.


 

Table3. Description of Sociodemographic characters of the study participants with respect to TV viewing.

Variable

TV viewing

X2 and P value

< 7 hr/wk

7-14 hr/wk

> 14hr/wk

Age

20- 40

4 (18.18%)

7(31.82%)

11(50%)

X2=17.19

 

P=0.001*

40-60

2(8.69%)

1(4.35%)

20(86.96%)

>60

3(33.33%)

5(55.56%)

1(11.11%)

Sex

Male

5(17.86%)

6(21.43%)

17(60.71%)

X2=0.239

P=0.88

Female

4(15.38%)

7(26.92%)

15(57.69%)

Socioeconomic status

APL

8(16.67%)

11(22.92%)

29(60.42%)

X2=0.338

P=0.84

BPL

1(16.67%)

2(33.33%)

3(50%)

Smoking

Yes

1(10%)

3(30%)

6(60%)

X2=0.5

P=0.77

No

8(18.18%)

10(22.73)

26(59.09%)

Junk food

High

2(6.67%)

6(20%)

22(73.33%)

X2=11.09

P=0.025*

Moderate

4(21.05%)

6(31.58%)

9(47.37%)

Low

3(60%)

1(20%)

1(20%)

Physical activity

<2hr/wk

1(4.17%)

5(20.83%)

18(75%)

X2=11.66

P=0.02*

2-4hr/wk

2(12.5%)

4(25%)

10(62.5%)

>4hr/wk

6(42.86%)

4(28.57%)

4(28.57%)

BMI

<25

6(18.18%)

9(27.27%)

18(54.55%)

X2=0.79

P=0.671

>25

3(14.28%)

4(19.05%)

14(66.67%)

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome: In the current study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among study participants was 51.85% with high prevalence among females (57.69%) when compared to males (46.42%). With regard to age, metabolic syndrome was high among the age groups of 61-70 (66.67%) followed by 51-60 (58.33%).


Table 4: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among study participants

 

Age (years)

Total study subjects

Metabolic syndrome

Males

females

Total

Males

Females

Total

20- 30

2

2

4

1(50%)

1 (50%)

2(50%)

31-40

11

7

18

5 (45.5%)

4(57.14)

9 (50%)

41-50

6

5

11

3 (50%)

3 (60%)

6 (54.55%)

51-60

6

6

12

3 (50)

4 (66.67%)

7 (58.33%)

61-70

1

5

6

1(100%)

3(60%)

4(66.67%)

>70

2

1

3

0

0

0

Total

28

26

54

13(46.42%)

15(57.69%)

28(51.85)

 

1

Figure 1: Age specific prevalence of metabolic syndrome in study subject

From table 5, it can be understood that in the current study, among males, high triglycerides and central obesity were the commonest abnormalities whereas lowest abnormality was high blood sugar .Similar to males, in females, the commonest abnormality was high triglycerides followed by low HDL and the lowest abnormality was high blood sugar.

From table 5, it can be understood that in the current study, among males, high triglycerides and central obesity were the commonest abnormalities whereas lowest abnormality was high blood sugar .Similar to males, in females, the commonest abnormality was high triglycerides followed by low HDL and the lowest abnormality was high blood sugar.

 

Table 5: Individual components of metabolic syndrome in the study subject

Variable

 

Males

Females

Triglycerides

 

Normal

14 (50%)

7(26.92)

High

14(50%)

19 (73.08%)

HDL

Normal

17(60.71%)

11(42.31%)

Low

11(39.29%)

15(57.69%)

Blood pressure

Normal

16 (57.14%)

14(53.85%)

High

12(42.86%)

12(46.15%)

Blood sugar

Normal

20(71.43%)

21(80.77%)

High

8 (28.57%)

5 (19.23%)

Waist circumference

Normal

14(50%)

12 (46.15%)

High

14(50%)

14(53.85%)

Predictors of metabolic syndrome: In the current study, among all the Sociodemographic characters, prolonged TV viewing, smoking, high junk food intake, low physical activity, high BMI significantly contributed to increased risk of metabolic syndrome among study population

Table 6: Predictors of metabolic syndrome among study subjects

Variable

Metabolic syndrome

X2 and P value

Present

Absent

Age(y)

20-40

13(24.07)

9(16.67)

X2=3.82

 

P=0.147

41-60

13(24.07)

10(18.52)

>60

2(3.7)

7(7.78)

Sex

Male

13(24.07)

15(27.78)

X2=0.68

P=0.407

Female

15(57.69)

11(20.37)

Socioeconomic status

APL

27(50)

21(38.89)

X2=3.34

P=0.067

BPL

1(1.85)

5(9.26)

TV viewing

< 7 hr/wk

1(1.85)

 

8(14.81)

X2=7.45

P=0.024*

7-14 hr/wk

7(12.96)

6(11.11)

> 14hr/wk

20(37.03)

12(22.22)

Smoking

yes

8(14.81)

2(3.7)

X2=3.89

P=0.048*

NO

20(37.03)

24(44.44)

Junk food

high

21(38.89)

9(16.67)

X2=9.11

P=0.01*

moderate

6(11.11)

13(24.07)

Low

1(1.85)

4(7.4)

Physical activity

< 2hr/wk

18 (33.33)

6(11.11)

X2=16.48

P=0.0002*

2-4hrs/wk

9(16.67)

7(12.96)

>4hrs/wk

1(1.85)

13(24.07)

BMI

<25

11(20.37)

22(40.74)

X2=11.65

P=0.0006*

>25

17(31.48)

4(7.4)

                                          P<0.05* significant

DISCUSSION

The present study was done to assess the association between TV viewing and metabolic syndrome among the residents of Anantapur residing within 2km from medical college. In the current study, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 51.85 % whereas in D.S .Prasad et al study 28, the prevalence was 33.5%. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is increasing exponentially in India, both in the urban and rural areas. It has escalated in different parts of India to figures now ranging from 11% to 41%29 .The differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome between studies from Indian subcontinent may be attributed to different criteria employed, different age groups included, and different rates of prevalence of individual components of the metabolic syndrome. In the current study, there was no significant gender difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (P<0.05) whereas in D.S.Prasad et al study 28, Women (52.2 %) had significantly higher rates of metabolic syndrome compared to men (34.2 %). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was found to be increasing with age with high prevalence in the age group of 61-70 similar to D.S.Prasad et al study 28 wherein people above 65years age have five fold increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Coming to the individual components of metabolic syndrome, low HDL and high triglycerides were commonest abnormalities found among both the genders. Low HDL could be high central obesity found among the study population It was found in the current study that both men and women who on average spent more than 14 hours per week watching television had a significantly higher risk of having metabolic syndrome than those who spent less than 14 hours per week doing so. Similar association was found in the Dunstan et al study 30 and Chang et al study 31.The high risk association between TV viewing and metabolic syndrome could be due to reason that TV viewing replaces physical activity which in turn leads to decreased energy expenditure. Other Sociodemographic characters like smoking, high junk food intake, low physical activity, high BMI were also significantly associated with metabolic syndrome in the current study whereas in D.S Prasad et al study28, Older age, female gender, general obesity, inadequate fruit intake, hypercholesterolemia, and being middle-to higher Socioeconomic status significantly contributed to an increased metabolic syndrome risk among the study population.

 

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, in the current study it was found that excess TV viewing had an adverse effect on metabolic syndrome, a finding that was statistically significant. Metabolic syndrome was also found to be high among those with low physical activity and high junk food intake. So the current study reveals that life style factors affect the normal physiological characters. Hence, to reduce the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components, it may not only be important to increase participation in physical activity, but also to reduce leisure time activities like time spent watching TV, using mobile phone/computer etc .

 

REFERENCES

  1. Mohan V, Rao GHR. Type 2 Diabetes in South Asains. 1st ed. New Delhi: South Asian Society on Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis; 2007.
  2. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash AK, Das BC. Abdominal obesity, anindependent cardiovascular risk factor in Indian subcontinent: Aclinico epidemiological evidence summary. J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2011; 2:199-205.
  3. Misra A, Khurana L. The metabolic syndrome in South Asians: Epidemiology, clinical correlates and possible solutions. International Diabetes Monitor 2009; 21:92-101.
  4. SB: The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated riskfactor findings in the US population from the Third NationalHealth and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003, 163:427-36.
  5. Lidfeldt J, Nyberg P, Nerbrand C, Samsioe G, Schersten B, Agardh CD: Socio-demographic and psychosocial factors are associated with features of the metabolic syndrome. The Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) study. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2003, 5:106-12.
  6. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Skoumas J, Tousoulis D,Toutouza M, Toutouzas P, Stefanadis C: Impact of lifestyle habits on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Greek adults from the ATTICA study. American Heart Journal 2004, 147:106-12.
  7. Park HS, Oh SW, Cho SI, Choi WH, Kim YS: The metabolic syndrome associated lifestyle factors among South Korean adults. International Journal of Epidemiology 2004, 33:328-36.
  8. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, HeymsfieldSB: The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994.Archives of Internal Medicine 2003, 163:427-36.
  9. Stone NJ: Focus on lifestyle change and the metabolic syndrome.Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America 2004, 33:493-508.
  10. Wamala SP, Lynch J, Horsten M, Mittleman MA, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K: Education and the metabolic syndrome in women. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:1999-2003 27.
  11. Fitzgerald SJ, Kriska AM, Pereira MA, de Courten MP: Associations among physical activity, television watching, and obesity in adult Pima Indians. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997, 29:910-915.
  12. Fung TT, Hu FB, Yu J, Chu NF, Spiegelman D, Tofler GH, Willett WC,Rimm EB: Leisure-time physical activity, television watching, and plasma biomarkers of obesity and cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Epidemiol 2000, 152:1171-78.
  13. Hu FB, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rimm EB: Physical activity and television watching in relation to risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. Arch Intern Med 2001, 161:1542-48
  14. Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE: Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003, 289:1785-91.
  15. Jakes RW, Day NE, Khaw KT, Luben R, Oakes S, Welch A, Bingham S, Wareham NJ: Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolkpopulation-based study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003, 57:1089-96.
  16.  Kronenberg F, Pereira MA, Schmitz MK, Arnett DK, Evenson KR, Crapo RO, Jensen RL, Burke GL, Sholinsky P, Ellison RC, Hunt SC:Influence of leisure time physical activity and television watching on atherosclerosis risk factors in the NHLBI Family Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 2000, 153:433-43.
  17. Salmon J, Bauman A, Crawford D, Timperio A, Owen N: The association between television viewing and overweight among Australian adults participating in varying levels of leisuretime physical activity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24:600-06.
  18. Gustat J, Srinivasan SR, Elkasabany A, Berenson GS: Relation of selfrated measures of physical activity to multiple risk factors of insulin resistance syndrome in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Journal of Clinica Epidemiology 2002, 55:997-1006.
  19. Ford ES, Kohl HW 3rd, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA: Sedentary behavior,physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obesity Research 2005, 13:608-14.
  20. Bertrais S, Beyeme-Ondoua JP, Czernichow S, Galan P, Hercberg S,Oppert JM: Sedentary behaviors, physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged French subjects. Obesity Research 2005, 13:936-44.
  21. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Cameron AJ, Dwyer T, Jolley D, Shaw JE, AusDiab Steering Committee: Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia 2005, 48:2254-61.
  22. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, provisional report of a WHO Consultation. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 539- 53.
  23. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA.2001:285:2486-97.
  24. Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The Metabolic Syndrome: Time for a Critical Appraisal Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.Diabetes Care 2005; 28:2289-304.
  25. Backgrounder 1. The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. IDF Communications ed. Brussels, Belgium:International Diabetes Federation; 2006.
  26. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI,Donato KA et al. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation 2009; 120: 1640-5.
  27. Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, et al. Consensus Statement for Diagnosis of Obesity, Abdominal Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome for Asian Indians and Recommendations for Physical Activity, Medical and Surgical Management. JAPI 2009; 57: 163- 70.
  28. D. S. Prasad, Z. Kabir, A. K. Dash, B. C. Das. Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India. JCDR, Vol 3, pg no-204-211
  29. Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome in Developing Countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93(11_Supplement_1):s9-30.
  30. D. W. Dunstan. J. Salmon. N. Owen. T. Armstrong .P. Z. Zimmet. T. A. Welborn , et al. Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia (2005) 48: 2254–2261.
  31. Pei-Chia Chang, Tsai-Chung Li, Ming-Tsang Wu, Chiu-Shong Liu,Chia-Ing Li2, Ching-Chu Chen. Association between television viewing and the risk of metabolicsyndrome in a community-based population. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:193.